Preview

Overcoming The Greco-Persian Wars

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1262 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Overcoming The Greco-Persian Wars
The Ancient Greek city-states of the 5th century BCE took on one of the most powerful and dangerous empires of the ancient world in a struggle to maintain independence from the Persians. The Persians represented the opposite in ideals of everything that is Greek and threatened the end of political sovereignty, higher thinking, and innovation. Overcoming the Persians was a critical accomplishment by the Greeks in the Greco-Persian wars of the 5th century and can be attributed to their superior strategizing and exceptional leadership in time of crisis.
The Persian wars got its start in 499 BCE on the eastern shores of the Aegean Sea. The Greek colonies of Iona had been taken over by the king of Persia, Darius, and it was not long before they
…show more content…
The Persian army, under King Darius, camped on the beach of Marathon and planned on marching to Athens and overwhelm them with their superior numbers. Mobilizing their troops quickly, the Athenians swiftly assembled in the hills above the beach directly in the path of the Persians. Instead of attacking immediately the Persians camped on the beach for several days, allowing the Athenian generals to hold a council and decide on a course of action . The Council wisely put Miltiades in charge of the conducting of the eminent battle and he was able to find a solution to the problem of being outnumbered by the Persians. His main concern was of being enveloped by the enemy. He decided to weaken his center lines of troops and put the extra men on the flanks of his three pronged formation. When the battle started the Persian center was able to break through Miltiades center but their flanks were overwhelmed and the Persian phalanx collapsed upon itself. The two flanks met in the center and subdued the entire army due to Miltiades strategy and execution. The Athenians were able to capture 7 Persian ships, kill 6,400 Persians, and only lose 192 men; it was a complete …show more content…
This was the second important battle of the war. Thermopylae was chosen as the site for a stand because it would be a bottle-neck for the Persians, making it hard for them to utilize their strength in numbers. Only a small force of 300 elite Spartan warriors and 700 Thespians held off the Persians for four days of grueling fighting until they were eventually overwhelmed . Although they were defeated in Thermopylae, it was not a complete lose. The Persians suffered heavy casualties, delayed the advance of the enemy, and became a unifying heroic legend that helped to make the Greek city-states pull together and fight

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Battle of thermopylae was an important battle for both the persian and greek army, the leader of the persian fleet was Xerxes whose army was far more larger than King Leonidas, leader of the Greek army, but Leonidas was a far more tactical and smarter war general than Xerxes.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Battle of Thermopylae is shrouded in fluctuating estimations and conflicting historic accounts. There is as much myth, legend and mystery surrounding the actual battle as we have historical records for it. Historians from ancient Greece were very biased and so we must find a middle ground between accounts to have an educated opinion of what really happened. The most speculation involves the actual numbers and count of each side; the Greek forces and the Persian forces. Greek accounts say the Persians numbered over a million. Herodotus even exclaims the Persian forces reached up to 2.6 million strong. We know today that this would hardly have been possible and that Herodotus had probably greatly exaggerated in his writings to glorify the Greeks.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The battle of Thermopylae was the first between the Persians and Greeks during the Persian invasion of 480-479 BC. The Greek force was very small but was determined to make a stand against the huge Persian army. The battle of Thermopylae resulted in a massive loss to the Greeks as the Persian army heavily defeating them.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While strongest at the front, the phalanx's main weakness was on the right flank and to the rear. Once engaged in battle the heavy armor and close quarters did not allow the phalanx to easily address attacks from either of those directions. Although the battle of Thermopylae was a decisive Persian victory, the employment of the phalanx formation proved to be a useful and superior strategy there as roughly fourteen hundred Hoplite led by King Leonidas and three hundred Spartans held their ground for a week (three spent fighting) halting Persian advancement and causing numerous casualties. Were it not for a traitor exposing a path to the rear of the Greek positionallowing the Persian forces to surround the Greek position, there's no way of knowing how long this small force could have fought or whether or not they could have been victorious.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle Of Thermoplyae

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Battle of Thermopylae started in August of September of 480 BC. The battle lead by King Leonides of Sparta and Xerxes of The Persian empire. The Persians were trying to overtake Greece. In an effort to protect the Greek cities, The Greek Army lead by King Leonides was sent to the Pass of Thermopyle to stop the Persian entry into Greece.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greek offensive, although contributed to Miltiades as a brilliant strategic decision, is an important historiographical issue for modern historians. Herodotus tells us that opinion among the Athenian commanders was divided with some opposed to attacking with their heavily outnumbered force. Others, especially Miltiades supported an offensive strategy. Miltiades is credited with persuading the war archon Callimachus through a stirring speech to cast his deciding vote in favour of an offensive strategy. Herodotus in his narrative has Miltiades say ‘If we refuse to fight, I have little doubt that the result will be bitter”. However it has also been suggested that the Greek offensive was based on the apparent absence of the Persian cavalry which Herodotus fails to mention. This is puzzling as most modern historians acknowledge that a Persian cavalry force had already disembarked from the fleet onto land and Herodotus said the Persians chose Marathon because it was “the best ground for cavalry to manoeuvre in.”. It has also been assumed that Miltiades deployed the Greek phalanx with strong wings and a weak centre, a strategy that secured…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Persians were a brutish people, who wanted nothing more than to conquer and ruin the Greek way of life. The Persians played the Greek city-states against one another in order to inhibit success against their attacks. The Ionian Greeks were conquered by these barbarians, and their way of life was threatened. The Greek's freedom was perishing, while the power of the Persian's continued to expand. The Persians were a tolerant empire with strong leaders and some autonomy though they restricted the Ionian Greek's autonomy to make their lives easier, then pitting the Greek city-states against each other in order to have influence within Greek culture once again, though the defeat of the Persians was a crucial victory for the Greeks, because…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Persia Argumentative Essay The Persian war was not caused by Persia. The Persian war was a result of the ignorance of Athens. Athens caused the war by helping the Ionians revolt against Persia.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greeks won the war against the Persians. In the war the Persians thought they could sneak attack Athens but the Greeks were waiting for them the whole time. The battle of Thermopylae was the second war. The Persians won the war against the Greeks. In the war the Greeks thought they could go in a tight spot so the Persians had to send a few soldiers in at a time.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Thermopylae of 480 BC, an alliance of Greek city-states fought the invading Persian Empire at the pass of Thermopylae in central Greece. Vastly outnumbered, the Greeks held back the Persians for three days in one of history's most famous last stands. A small force led by King Leonidas of Sparta blocked the only road through which the massive army of Xerxes I could pass. After three days of battle, a local resident named Ephialtes betrayed the Greeks by revealing a mountain path that led behind the Greek lines. Dismissing the rest of the army, King Leonidas stayed behind with 300 Spartans and 700 Thespian volunteers (Number vary). The Persians succeeded in taking the pass but sustained heavy losses, extremely disproportionate to…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persia and Greece were beautiful and prosperous empires and where the most influential of their time. In this essay I will talk about the two main empires’ political structures and their economy and I will also state similarities and differences between the two empires. The two empires’ political structures might have varied greatly but their economies were very similar. Even though they had differences and had major battles they were still the ideal empires of their time.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    as stated “Herodotus was known as the World’s first Historian.”(Livius.org). Herodotus was biased towards the Greeks so when he chose to write about the Greco-Persian war it made the Greeks seem like the good guys and the Persians seem like the villains. Due to the fact that there was not a lot of historical documents other civilizations in the future had no choice but to also be biased towards the Greeks and against the Persians. The Thermopylae war in the movie 300 is a perfect example of how the Persians are portrayed because they are perceived as monsters and the Greeks are the protagonists. In correlation to reality , “The Persian Empire was one of the largest and most impressive empires to ever exist”.(Lang).…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If Sparta beats Demaratus and his army that war will be the most memorable war fought in history during that time. During that time of the battle, the Persian army was not doing as expected even though they had renewed their onslaught hope they could defeat the badly hurt and dismembered Greek army. The Greeks used tactics that the Persians were not ready for by using waves of…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, the battle of Marathon too place in august in Marathon Greece. This battle was fought between Persia,Athens, and aided by Plataea. This was during the first Persian invasion of Greece. This battle was water shed in the greco-persian wars, showing the greeks that the persians could be beaten and that they could win battle without the spartans ( they had often relied heavily on the spartans).…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leonidas

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Leonidas handpicked 300 men to take with him to the Thermopylae, he was sent “in order that the sight of them might encourage the other confederates to fight and prevent them from going over to the enemy”. Leonidas as a young boy had been trained mentally and physically to fight in preparation to become a hoplite warrior, as a military leader handpicking his 300 men would have been a tactic used to find the strongest Spartan men who he trusted. The 300 Spartan men would have been equipped with a round shield, spear and iron short sword. In battle they used a formation called the phalanx in which rows if hoplites stood directly next to each so shields overlapped with one another. When the Persians attacked from the side and back of the phalanx, the Spartan formation would have been vulnerable which proved to be Leonidas weakness against the invading army. Leonidas although had a strong 300 Spartans he did not have enough tactics and men to stop a strong Persian army in battle, which limited his contribution to the Persian war.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays