Preview

Over-Mighty Nobility Was The Main Causes Of The Roses

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
959 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Over-Mighty Nobility Was The Main Causes Of The Roses
Using these three sources in their historical context, assess how far they support the view that the problem of an over-mighty nobility was the main cause of the outbreak of the wars of the roses

During the rule of Henry VI, certain nobles had increasing amounts of power, which angered some of the other nobles who felt they were being ignored. It is certain that they had too much power at the time, and that this was a contributing cause for the outbreak of the conflicts, however it was catalysed by things like bastard feudalism These sources show various views linked to the statement that “the problem of an over-mighty nobility was the main cause of the outbreak of the wars of the roses”. In this essay, I will put the sources in context using my own knowledge and see how far they support or disagree the statement, and to what extent it is true.
…show more content…
It states that the Duke of Somerset at the time “dominates and rules about the king’s person”, the Duke of Somerset was a favoured noble of Henry VI’s, especially liked by Margaret of Anjou. The source is suggesting that the Duke of Somerset controlled some of the decisions made by the king, referencing towards the loss of Normandy by his army. Henry VI was not very wise, certainly when it came to ruling the country, allowing himself to be ruled by the nobles around him, this could be one of the reasons for his lavish expenditure. Therefore, this source does support the claim that the over-mighty nobility was a big reason for the outbreak of the wars, but also gives evidence of Henry VI being a weak king, after all he had the power to put a stop to the problems Somerset was causing but he did little to stop

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Throughout the years 1536-69 five rebellions took place, all of which could be interpreted as a dangerous challenge to the monarch and the state, at the same time all of which can be interpreted as not a dangerous challenge instead could even have strengthen the monarch and the state. Source X agrees with the statement as ‘each monarch faced at least one serious revolt.’ Source V suggest that a lack of leadership, organisation and ‘geographic limits’ hindered the success of many rebellions such as the northern rebellion or the pilgrimage of grace. Source W agrees with the statement ‘in the right hands and with the right circumstances’ popular protest in the sixteen century could have posed a dangerous challenge to the monarch and the state. I will interpret these sources to determine whether the rebellions of the 16th century did or did not pose a dangerous challenge to the monarch and the state.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The eighteenth century witnessed a large number of expensive and drawn-out wars. Who was attempting to alter the balance of power? Were the causes of these wars economic or political?…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The War of the Roses was a crucial and significant period in the England’s history playing an important role in it. There were many factors which can be seen as the causes of the war. However, it is vital to clarify to what extent its outbreak was caused by Henry’s inadequacies.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    So, by birth, Henry was of nobility, for he was Henry [Tudor], earl or Richmond. Henry’s nobility did grant him with a chance to rule, however there were others with a stronger claim to rule. To obtain the thrown; Henry VII fought against King Richard, in…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ii) Elizabeth had no children so the crown went to Mary Queen of Scots, a Catholic.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fourteenth century was a era of crisis. A “little ice” age led to famine, but a greater disaster followed:…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Was Henry Viii's Rule

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The successes of Henry VIII can be seen in his ability to keep and gain power and the force of his military efforts.To determine if Henry’s rule was a success, we must define what success means in the context of a ruler. This argument identifies the goals set forth by Henry, and his ability to achieve these goals. It’s also worthwhile to note the state and legacy that his rule left upon England. The reasons we can call Henry VIII’s reign a success will be laid out in his personal, political, religious and military accomplishments while on the throne. Henry’s reign can be defined by his ability to indulge in his desires. Whether that was to take and hold power, spend money on luxuries and war, or to consume more food in his later years. He had a number of personal desires beyond living a life of luxury, namely to have an male heir to the throne. Despite troubling history of marriage, he was successful in not only producing one heir, but three: Edward VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I.Henry was successful in using fear to make those seeking to undermine think…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There can be no doubt that, from her birth in 1124 (c) to her death in 1204, Eleanor of Aquitaine made a significant contribution to politics and mediaeval life in general, despite numerous obstructions from those around her due to her position as a women or the extent of her actions. In this essay however, I will examine the extent of her influence throughout the different phases of her life in chronological order, as this will allow us to consider the positive and negative effects respectively of each single achievement or trait. To this end, I shall categorise her life into the periods of: Her early years and marriage to King Louis of France, her marriage to King Henry and years of freedom therein, the rebellion of 1173 and her subsequent imprisonment, and her contribution under the reigns of her sons Richard and John. It will be necessary therefore to comment, if she was not influential for a period of her life, upon the reasons and causes for this, as our opinion and conclusions about her must change if she was unable, rather than unwilling to achieve her targets.…

    • 3412 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The pursuit of glory and honour outweighed the security of England in deciding Henrician foreign policy. Although Henry’s foreign policy in this period was greatly influenced by his desire for security, both personal and national, there is much historiographical debate as to whether it was the primary motive of his actions abroad. In this essay glory and honour will be dealt with together, although glory tends to be associated with wartime victory, whereas honour is related to the upholding of status and in particular the dignity of Henry VIII - together both of these contribute to the overall prestigious nature of a monarch and are associated heavily with one another in a late Medieval context. Whilst security was consistent with the desires…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    He believes that the Bubonic Plague was the culprit. The Black Plague devastated population numbers which in turn threw the economy into flux. In this new changing economy, the main resource of the nobles and gentry, land, was “...artificially inflating beyond an acceptable working price”. This “...suited suited lesser landowners better than greater ones,” because they could more easily respond to altering circumstances and they had fewer financial obligations. Wealthier individuals with minimal land commitments could better adapt to a changing a society, thus they prospered as the nobles languished. The nobles primarily constituted the knightly class so as they lost their affluence, they could no longer afford to be knights. It was extremely costly to be a knight; the armor was expensive, the squires were expensive and the horses were expensive. Without the financial resources to maintain quality armor, horses and squires, knights were forced to relinquish their position in society.…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the War of the Roses, England was constantly in a state of war between the House of Lancaster and the House of York, who were massive rivals that competed for the throne of England (History 320 Lecture, 10/30/2015). In Polydore Vergil’s account of Henry VII, Richard III’s personal ambition can be seen. The author first tells of a nightmare Richard has the night before Bosworth Field, which Vergil believes was “no dream but a conscience guilty of heinous offences, a conscience, I say” (Polydore Vergil, Account of Henry VII, 479). Though the source makes no explicit mentions of it, it is widely believed that Richard III murdered his nephews to take the throne. When his brother, Edward IV died, his legitimate son was crowned Edward V, but was shortly taken captive by his uncle and placed into the Tower of London (History 320 Lecture, 10/30/2015). Instead of allowing for a legitimate heir to take the throne as it should have gone, Richard went to immeasurable lengths to ensure he would be king, further escalating the conflict and disrupting English society as a whole. This caused not only great scandal, but Richard III was a terrible king, guilty of many offenses as Vergil states. He created great disruption not only in his court by taking the throne away from his nephew, but also to the lives of his subjects. Vergil makes note of this as well, specifically mentioning the strife of the English people, who had consistently been “torn by rival factions” (Polydore Vergil, Account of Henry VII,…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instability remained a common theme throughout English history, especially in the years of 1400-1600. The King's reign of England would usually determine the stability of the realm. When wars broke out, taxes were increased and society became unstable. Those who appeased the King were placed above others, while those who dissatisfied him would meet the blade. That was well understood by the people in the realm of England. Sir Thomas More was an Englishman whom personified the instability of the time. Sir Thomas More was a popular scholar and statesman who towards the latter part of his life became a martyr for his beliefs. The following paper will explore the life and ideas of Sir Thomas…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summer Assignment

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. What were the causes and effects of the Hundred Years War for England and France? Include Joan of Arc in your discussion.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Directions: The following question requires you to construct an essay that integrates your interpretation of Documents A-J and your knowledge of the period referred to in the question. In the essay you should strive to support your assertions both by citing key pieces of evidence from the documents and by drawing on your knowledge of the period.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wars Of The Roses Causes

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Henry VI was born December 6, 1421, became king of England on September 1, 1422, and finally king of France as well when his maternal grandfather, Charles VI passed two months later. Due to his minority, a council of regents was appointed to handle the governance from Henry V’s relations: brothers Humphrey, Duke of Gloucester and John, Duke of Bedford, his uncle Thomas Beaufort, Duke of Exeter, and another uncle, Henry Beaufort, Bishop of Winchester. Bedford also served as Henry VI’s heir. Henry V left England at the height of its power, with his devastating victory in the Battle of Agincourt, essentially giving France to his descendants. Gloucester and Bedford were effective leaders, leaving Henry VI a prosperous England and an even larger France than he had originally inherited. However, as time went on, a rivalry grew between Dukes Gloucester and Exeter. As Henry VI approached the end of his minority, Bedford died and Gloucester and Beaufort sought to establish for themselves future positions of power as advisors to Henry VI. With Bedford’s death, Gloucester was now the heir…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays