Preview

Outline the Argument that Supermarket Power is a ‘Zero-Sum’Game.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1201 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Outline the Argument that Supermarket Power is a ‘Zero-Sum’Game.
Outline the Argument that Supermarket Power is a ‘Zero-Sum’Game.

Over the past few decades, hundreds of supermarkets have been built in towns and cities across the UK. They have become such a powerful force, that the four largest supermarkets, (Tesco, Sainsburys, Asda and Morrisons, ) take nearly three out of every four pounds spent on groceries, in the UK. (Bevan 2006). They have a combined market share of over 73.6% of the UK grocery market. (www.wikipedia.org “List of supermarket chains in the UK”).

What is a ‘Zero-Sum’ Game?

American born , Sociologist, Dennis Wrong (1997) stated that the power held by the supermarkets is a ‘zero-sum’ game. This means that they are in a situation whereby one party’s loss is another party’s gain and vice versa. If you subtract the total losses from the total gains, the sum would equal zero. (Taylor et al., 2012, p.70)

For example, when a new supermarket opens up in a town, which is currently predominantly supplied by local stores, the supermarket will most probably take a significant proportion of their customers from them, due to their lower prices and promotions. This means that the supermarkets gain, by increasing sales and the local shops will lose out. Therefore, for example, total gains of the supermarket would be +1, as they have gained new custom, and the loss of the local shop is -1 as they have lost out. +1 subtract -1 equals 0.

“In economic theory, a zero-sum game is a mathematical representation of a situation in which a participant's gain (or loss) of utility is exactly balanced by the losses (or gains) of the utility of the other participant(s). If the total gains of the participants are added up, and the total losses are subtracted, they will sum to zero.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-sum_game)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The U.K. grocery market is highly diverse, with a wide range of formats, from convenience stores to hypermarkets, warehouse clubs and online stores. The market is currently led by five grocers (Tesco, Sainsbury, Wal-Mart‘s Asda, Morrisons and Cooperative Group), accounting for almost 55% of grocery retail banner sales, while the remaining 45% is attributed to hundreds of outlets scattered throughout the country (Planet Retail). Over the years, large players have continued to expand, both in terms of size, product range and services, increasingly taking market share from their smaller competitors.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    ‘Outline’ – to define the nature of supermarkets and summarise the power they have over consumer society.…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Introducing and by using the postive sum and zero sum define the grant supermarkets role as a winner in a consumer society and it effects related to…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Power is a term used to denote influence and control or dominance (Allen 2009, p59), in terms of supermarkets this power extends beyond their influence over British high streets and into foreign countries, In this essay I will be describing how this power has a range of both positive effects and examining the various arguments surrounding these.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In its report of competitiveness of retail prices for standard groceries, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC, 2008) stated that “Australian food prices have been increasing at a rate greater than the CPI since 1990. Among a number of comparable OECD countries, Australia is the only economy that exhibits that feature”. The criticism is on the competition within this market. In this essay, I will be discussing about Australian imperfect competition in the retail grocery and its implications to the consumers; and the vertically integrated supply chain employed by the Major Supermarket Chains (MSCs) and the entry barriers which these systems bring along. A payoff matrix is also shown in order to develop entry strategy for a new competitor.…

    • 2257 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Waitrose Analysis

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Waitrose is operating in the UK grocery market, which in 2001 was estimated at £103.4bn. Food sales are the core business of the supermarkets and spending on food in the UK has been growing year-on-year since 1990; The market has proved to be very recession proof. However non-food articles account for a growing share. The market is led by the ‘big four' – Tesco, Sainsbury's, ASDA and Safeway. Together with Somerfield, Iceland and Waitrose these companies take by far the largest chunk of the market.…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Supermarkets dominate our high street throughout the UK. With this domination there is power, the power to influence and control how and where we shop. The majority of us do our weekly shop in a supermarket; 30 million according to Bevan (2006) cited in (Allen, 2009, p. 74). We use supermarkets because they are convenient, have a good range and are cheap. However, all this comes at a price, we shall see how supermarkets use their market power and buying power to maximize their profits at the expense of local communities and overseas suppliers. We shall also look at how supermarkets make winners and losers in a zero-sum and positive-sum game. Overall, we shall see how the size of the supermarket chains can be used for the abuse of, or even the good of local and overseas communities.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zero- sum game and non-zero are terms used to refer to situations where there are gains and losses. Non-zero sum game is where one decision gain or loss doesn't necessarily result in the others loss or gain. In this theory, the wins and loses, of all players do not add up to zero and everyone can win or lose. Commonly this is referred to as a “win-win situation” The common example given of this is the prisoner's dilemma, a situation where two people are committed a crime are being interrogated separately, they are given two choices that will create three outcomes. If prisoner 1 keeps his mouth shut and doesn't say anything but prisoner 2 tells everything, prisoner a will get the worst punishment while prisoner 2 walks free, and vice…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Arjun Pahwa Math Research Paper The Application of the Nash Equilibrium in Game Theory to Microeconomics ! One of the most challenging problems a business owner comes across is the…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    * A loss leader is a product that is sold at a price below its direct MC to encourage sales of a complementary good…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Operation research

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Did you observe one thing that it was applicable to only 2 x 2 payoff…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Game Theory in Economics

    • 2080 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Game theory is a concept of decision making that considers more elements beyond just benefits minus costs. Specifically, it includes the interaction between participants. In economics, the theory attempts to predict the participants’ optimal decisions. It has found a core place in economic decision-making and policy-making for its inherent ability to predict reactions in resource allocation, business negotiation, and other economic aspects. Game theory is mostly associated with decision-theory and other contexts such as cooperation and negotiations.…

    • 2080 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Zero-Sum Game Case Study

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Two drivers drive against each other, tending to have a car accident. One driver must change direction; otherwise both may die in the collision because that there is only one way to go forward. However, if only one does and the other refuses, the swerved driver loses under the name of a coward, a “chicken”. This model is prevalent in IR. The competition for a common profit contributes to the divergent choices of opponents: either pacification or conflict. No one doubted that chicken is too dangerous to play. As you want to be the winner, you are threated by worst outcome. On the other hand, cooperation is not so easy either, under the menace of being lost, the second-worst outcome. Zagare & Slantchev (2010) agreed that if players dictated rationally, they cannot run in or out any…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nash Equilibrium is a game theory concept, so the general idea about this was it applies to games. Economists had other ideas…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Parker, C. (2013, Feb 13). ACCC’s inquiry into supermarket bullying misses the real issue of duopoly power. The Conversation .…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays