Preview

Out of Africa or Multiregional Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
802 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Out of Africa or Multiregional Theory
For many years, scientists have wondered about the evolution of mankind. The two theories that scientists have come up with over the years to explain the theory of evolution were the multiregional theory and out of Africa theory. The multiregional theory expresses the idea that Homo erectus developed in different parts of the world. The out of Africa theory expresses that Homo erectus developed in Africa nearly two million-years-ago and as the temperatures changed, they moved throughout the world and developed differently.
“The multiregional view posits that genes from all human populations of the Old World flowed between different regions and by mixing together, contributed to what we see today as fully modern humans. The replacement hypothesis suggests that the genes in fully modern humans all came out of Africa. As these peoples migrated they replaced all other human populations with little or no interbreeding” (Johanson, 2001). “The multi-regional hypothesis argues that our early hominid ancestors, including Homo ergaster and Homo heidelbergensis, migrated out of Africa and thus the evolution of modern humans took place in different parts of the world – a process termed regional continuity. This theory places great emphasis on the notion of steady evolutionary alterations or changes that happen in different regions and produce diverse variations of the species. Evolution of this kind is kept at a regular rate due to an amalgamation of cultural progress and ‘gene flow’ or interbreeding, thus keeping all lineages evolving at the same time. This process is characterized as parallel evolution, which suggests a subtle morphological resemblance between populations of species who are geographically separated” (Edwards, 2012). “The out of Africa view posits that Homo erectus migrated out of Africa the different populations became reproductively isolated, evolving independently, and in some cases like the Neanderthals, into separate species Homo sapiens arose in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    This book is inspired by just such a cross-cultural encounter as that between Kamal the border raider and the Colonel’s son of the Guides. In the first chapter the author recounts a conversation that he, a biologist studying bird evolution, had in New Guinea in 1972 with Yali, a local politician preparing his people for self-government, which culminated in the searching question ‘Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo [goods] and brought it to New Guinea, but we black people had little cargo of our own’ [p. 14]. ‘Yali’s question’ plays a central role in Professor Diamond’s enquiry into ‘a short history of everybody for the last 13,000 years’, leading him into a wide-ranging discussion of the history of human evolution and diversity through a study of migration, socio-economic and cultural adaptation to environmental conditions, and technological diffusion. The result is an exciting and absorbing account of human history since the Pleistocene age, which culminates in a sketch of a future scientific basis for studying the history of humans that will command the same intellectual respect as current scientific studies of the history of other natural phenomena such as dinosaurs, nebulas and glaciers.…

    • 2579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In her article entitled “Close Encounters of the Prehistoric Kind”, Science Magazine correspondent Ann Gibbons explains that due to interbreeding between Neanderthals and early modern humans, modern humans still contain traces of prehistoric Neanderthal DNA. According to researchers, Asians and Europeans most likely possess a higher frequency of Neanderthal genomes than Africans because the two species “occupied the [same regions] intermittently” in Europe, the Midwest, the Near East, and Russia and may have coexisted with one another for up to 10,000 years before the Neanderthal lineage died out. The article explains that Neanderthal genomes are present in “many people living outside of Africa” as there was not enough interbreeding occurring…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this section of the book, before we became homo sapiens, we evolved from past ancestors who weren’t up to par on further knowledge on life as modern humans today. The author suggests that humans come from a long past of ancestry from Africa that has been spread all around various parts of the globe. The locations of their selected spots have had a huge impact of the development of technologies and how they came to evolve to have more appealing characteristics suited for their area. This approaches the main question of the book strong because it gets straight to the point. Depending on the overall position of the continent, it influences the rate and levels of advancements in tools and intelligence. The author is trying to say that the whites could have been in a better position in location than the others.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In section one, chapter one, Diamond explains that the ancestors broke off from Africa as a separate lineage from animals about 7 million years ago. Human ancestors began walking upright around 4 million years ago, and they moved to Eurasia around 1 or 2 million years ago. Sometime between 100,000 and 50,000 years ago, not long after human fossils began to resemble modern homo sapiens, the human race had an explosion of new technological and artistic innovations that far surpassed anything previously created, also known as the Great Leap Forward. Shortly after, between 50,000 and 35,000 years ago, the human race expanded its territory. The arrival of humans in the Americas are harder to determine, but the colonization was at least 12,000…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Ordinarily, if someone has a theory which involves radical departure from what the experts have professed, he is expected to defend his position by providing evidence in its support.” Professor Mary Lefkowitz makes this statement in her book Not Out of Africa, a response to Martin Bernal’s Black Athena. Bernal’s book argues that Ancient Egypt along with other civilizations “… played fundamental roles in the formation of Ancient Greece.” Lefkowitz, being a classical scholar disagrees with Bernal as well as Dr. Yosef A. A. ben-Jochannan’s claim that Aristotle stole his philosophy from the Library of Alexandria and the notion that Socrates was black. Although Lefkowitz attempts to refute these arguments, the evidence she uses to support her claims are very weak and, as a result, detrimental to her argument.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 1: The first stages of humans originated from Africa approximately 7 million years ago.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Homo erectus – age, characteristics – first hominid species to migrate out of Africa (Bejing Man, Java Man)…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author of the book Guns, Germs, and Steel, Jared Diamond, tries hard to answer Yali’s question of why humans developed at such different rates on different continents. However, he cannot. In order to piece an answer together, a look at history and how it has effected life today can help. For example, why and how Francisco Pizarro was so easily able to defeat the Incas loans an answer. The question is like a puzzle. There is not one, simple answer, rather, multiple complex answers that still…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This chapter discusses the “great leap forward” or the extension of humankind beyond Africa. Did being in some location earlier give those peoples an advantage over later settlers? Africa had an enormous time advantage. However, humans, once they came to a continent, spread and adapted quickly to conditions. The Great Leap Forward was also important because without the evolution of cave paintings and stone tools, the society that we live in would be exceedingly different.…

    • 2524 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theory of evolution holds, not necessarily that man somehow descended from any kind of ape or monkey, but rather that probably he and they have arrived from a common ancestry.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over decades, many Americans reject the ideas of evolution and there were many arguments against the theory of human evolution. However, in order to understand how the human developed, we must look at the human evolution. For many centuries, we have been curious about our origins and our human bodies structure. How we got to be the kind of species we are today, such as the way we look; walking upright on two legs, our hands has five fingers, the size of our brain and teeth, and what makes us a unique species. Our animal ancestors have shaped our body structure in many ways, we humans have a lot in common than you might think with apes, reptiles and even fish.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In earlier history evidence shows humans originated from Africa and started spreading out 100,000 years ago. Similarly, the Europeans left to explore, also they came from Africa like the African slaves but they…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Out of Africa theory hypothesizes that modern humans originated in Africa over 100,000 years ago and replaced the world's archaic human species such as Homo Erectus and Neanderthals, after migrating within and then out of Africa to the non-African world within the last 50,000 to 100,000 years which involved a leading proponent of Chris Stringer. This view is highly accepted among both archaeological and anthropological academics as they do support the notion that archaic Homo populations did leave Africa in an initial phase of globalisation, called the Out of Africa 1 model. In a follow up to this, the population replacement hypothesis indicated that modern humans evolved in Africa from the ancestral hominids that did not travel out of this continent in the first stage of global colonisation. It is then argued in this model that once evolved as anatomically modern humans, Homo sapiens travelled out of Africa to explore, colonise and replace the archaic Homo population. This…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each ice age destroyed the habitats of creatures that had adapted to the arctic condition. But after each glaciation new species spread. As time went on, one branch lead to apes and the other lead to human beings, this line was named hominids. Indicated by J.M Roberts, “The first hominid fossil found in Kenya and Ethiopia are dated only 4.5 million years ago.” But then a French fossil hunter…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mixed Blood

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As defined by Fish, Humans are a species, which means that people from anywhere in the world can reproduce and create a fertile offspring. Human population over time were geographically separated from one another came to differ in physical appearance. They came through three major pathways: mutation, natural selection and genetic drift. Further, different geographical environments select for different physical traits that confer a survival advantage.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays