Preview

Origin of Inequality

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1751 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Origin of Inequality
The Origin of Inequality
Inequality amongst human beings in society is recognized as one of the greatest injustices we face in the world, and every person either benefits from this inequality or is harmed from it. In his Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, Jean- Jacques Rousseau discusses the origin of social inequality in humans. Rousseau uses his own theories on the natural and social state of man to express the reason for inequality in mankind. Even though Rousseau’s argument on the reason for inequality amongst mankind is hypothetical, he explains that the inequality that man has in a societal state results from the rich having an advantage over the poor, and the affects of pity and self-perseveration on mankind as man develops from a natural state to a societal state.
According to Rousseau, inequality in human beings is broken down into two major types. The first type of inequality is natural, and/or physical, which is “established by nature and consists in the difference of age, health, bodily strength, and qualities of mind or soul”(Rousseau 16). While the second type of inequality is moral, and or political, “because it depends on a kind of convention and is established, or at least authorized, by the consent of men,” (Rousseau 16). The main distinction between the two types is that they represent the natural and civil state of man. When referring to the traditional and scriptural view of mankind, men are supposed to portray qualities that make them different from an animal. In his discourse, Rousseau points out that when all the artificial faculties and supernatural gifts given to men by nature are stripped, he no longer portrays any inequalities of that of animal (Rousseau 19). Now man is just an animal who is weaker and less agile than most, but the most advantageously organized of all (Rousseau 19). Therefore he believes that the state of nature for man should not be associated with the artificial faculties of mankind. He dissociates any natural



Cited: Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1755. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rousseau proclaimed the natural goodness of man and believed that one man by nature is just as good as any other. For Rousseau, a man could be just without virtue and good without effort. According to Rousseau, man in the state of nature was free, wise, and good and the laws of nature were benevolent. It follows that it was civilization that enslaved and…

    • 2956 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rousseau, J.-J., Wootton, D. and Cress, D. (2012) Basic Political Writings: Discourse on the Sciences and the Arts, Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, Discourse on Political Economy, on the Social Contract, the State of War. 2nd edn. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau depicts man in his natural state as innocent and good, blaming the invention of property as the root of societal inequalities and lamenting the sacrifice of liberty required of members of a state. Rousseau's early man is deemed non-confrontational, concerned only with 'self-preservation'…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas Madison asserts that the State has no say over a person’s relationship with the Creator, Rousseau only rejects certain State religions on technical grounds and eventually concludes that society should demand a significant religious test. It is surprising that given Madison and Rousseau’s uniform goal, a stable society, they should come up with such widely varying methods for achieving it. One may be tempted to suggest that, unlike Rousseau, Madison considers individual rights to be more important than the proper functioning of society. Upon closer examination, however, it becomes clear that Madison and Rousseau's general disagreement on State power stems from a more fundamental dispute over how society works. According to Madison, society exists with a certain power and then instills this power in the government, while Rousseau argues that it is the creation of a government which makes society materialize. These disparate views on the directionality of government and society directly lead to Madison and Rousseau’s other…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since envy and egalitarian go hand and hand, recent research was done by a Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the University of Michigan, Elizabeth Anderson, noticed that the “concern of distributive justice is to compensate individuals for misfortune” (290). In a way, this approach is similar to a humanitarian approach because the misfortune is not able to come up with knowledge or money as frequent as those who do. Anderson had criticized one of Ronald Dworkin’s writings about how that equality is “envy-free” and how this further demonstrates that egalitarian views are solely based on “mere envy” (287). The reason why this type of society can hide the fact its based off of mere envy is by distributing positive attributes that cannot be distributed fairly. This is why so many individuals may feel cheated on because they cannot inherit the proper necessities from their inherited…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    These authors, however, have subjected their hypothesis to criticism and amendment, as the empirical evidence may suggest. Their works are closely related as they show the circumstances man has to go through to survive politically, economically, and socially. This includes respect for human rights, the survival for the fittest in the society, and the revolution to change the social order.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The aspects of a person’s life are not entirely determined by the circumstances he is born into – his decisions, the actions of others, and luck plays a large role as well. Since people are autonomous, they control how their lives turn out, but everyone’s life prospects are more “deeply shaped by a social structure that he or she did not choose” (page 130). This means that the poor are not entirely at fault for their living conditions; society’s structure may also affect their life outcomes. Not every citizen is granted equal opportunities, so not everyone should have the same social…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Anth 100 Essay 1

    • 2092 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Our society’s progression originates from the ideologies, principles, and dogmas passed down through a succession of different philosophical thinkers. We will focus our attention upon the post-Columbian European and American thinkers who have implemented their beliefs to assess the origins of human nature. This essay will provide a greater understanding between Michel de Montaigne, Rousseau Jean-Jacques and Thomas Hobbes with their descriptions of human nature, society’s origin, and the forces that propelled change in human history.…

    • 2092 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Man is no longer himself rather he has conformed to society which he has described as a powerful and restrictive system. Rousseau believes that is man would have never gained knowledge from the arts and sciences, then they would not have the false values and motives or behave in such barbaric ways. He especially focuses on the idea of politeness. He claims that this is merely a societal norm because behind it, people are actually just lying frauds and that arts and science is to blame because it has corrupted out minds. He positively correlates the knowledge of the arts and sciences with the corruption of…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    • Yew, L. (2002). Political Discourse – Theories of Colonialism and Postcolonialism. Retrieved 18th May, 2010, from http://www.postcolonialweb.org/poldiscourse/liberation.html.…

    • 2817 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rousseau, J.J. 1754. What is the Origin of Inequality Among Men and is it Authorized by Natural Law?…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Right Thing Theory

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    My personal views coincide with those of the author for this week’s essay prompt, who praises the practicality of Locke’s theories while renouncing the overtly idealistic ones of Rousseau. I agree with the author’s analysis that Locke’s theory holds more merit and is more persuasive than Rousseau’s. The author of the excerpt makes a compelling argument that Rousseau’s theory of human nature is naive and not applicable to reality. Rousseau's theories are inapplicable to reality because they are far too idealistic and fail to acknowledge the self-interested aspect of human nature. The argument from the essay prompt is a strong analysis of the philosophers because it effectively uses a personal anecdote to support Locke’s theory that a desire…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chaucer

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Finally Chaucer satirizes human nature to show how humans should all be equal, or all have an equal opportunity to be either wealthy or poor in life. “ ‘The firste moevere of the cause…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau argues that humans, originally, may not have been rational creatures . The only goal of humans was to just self-preserve . In the state of nature, humans are just animals and share the same characteristics as animals, because just like animals, humans want to survive and fulfill immediate desires . Also, in Rousseau’s state of nature, there are abundant resources, which make the savage, or animal, life self-sufficient. Rousseau argues that Hobbes was wrong about the “savage man” wanting to become the “civil man” and argues that Hobbes has mistakenly applied modern natural rights to a problem that has yet to exist in history .…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rousseau states that Hobbes and Locke mischaracterize the state of nature, since man is not motivated by greed, envy or material things in a true state of nature. From Rousseau point of view man would be motivated by love to the self and self preservation. Rousseau expresses how animals does not have a need for material things and they life in a state of nature.…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays