Organizational Change In The Criminal Justice Agency

Organizational Behavior Paper Managing organizational change in a criminal justice agency is similar to organizing change in the organizational setting but the change will be impacted by other aspects such as the due process rights of the citizen, a strict hierarchy, procedural or substantive laws, and the organizational culture. For example the police culture is strictly hierarchal and focused on investigating crimes within the confines of due process law. Any changes in the police culture will require a bureaucratic process that can be complicated and time consuming. Unlike the regular organization the process for any organizational change would be complex. The criminal justice agency does not only have to answer to other stakeholders in
Using a law enforcement agency as an example before any changes could be made to the policing organization it would have to travel up the change of command and be approved by political figures in society responsible for funding the police department. A police department might be structured like a regular organization but must answer to many people in society. In order to receive the necessary funding to function properly within their jurisdiction a police department must get funding from the state government. Without this funding the criminal agency, in this case the police department cannot function properly.
The taxpayer or members of the community have an influence on the type of behavior displayed by the police organization and the type of changes made. Members of the community where the police department operates play a powerful role in assisting police in their investigations of crimes. In order to ensure the cooperation of community members and the city’s ability to solve crimes police require the cooperation of community members. Organizational changes impacting the community members can have a negative or positive
The power-coercive according to Hans Morgenthauthis strategy advocates “power” in the form of threat sanctions, and believes that people are, in general compliant, and will ultimately bow down to those who possess greater power (Daster, 2011). What this means is the member of the criminal justice must comply or be held accountable. This is essential in the criminal justice agency. The authority structure is especially important in the law enforcement field. The environmental adaptive change management style involves gradually leading the members of the criminal justice agency into the change. This way the members of the organization have time to