Preview

Organizational Behaviors Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
282 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Organizational Behaviors Paper
Social identity theory is a social psychological analysis of the role of self-conception in group membership, group processes, and intergroup relations. It embraces a number of interrelated concepts and sub-theories that focus on social cognitive, motivational, social interactive and macro-social facets of group life. The approach is explicitly frames by a conviction that collective phenomena cannot be adequately explained in terms of isolated individual process or interaction alone and that social psychology should place large scale social phenomena near the top of its scientific agenda.
Social identity theory defines group cognitively, in terms of people’s self-conception as group members. A group exists psychologically if three or more people construe and evaluate themselves in terms of shared attributes that distinguish them collectively from other people. Social identity theory addresses phenomena such as prejudice, discrimination, ethnocentrism, stereotyping, intergroup conflict, conformity normative behavior, group polarizations, crown behavior, organizational behavior, leadership, deviance, and group cohesiveness.
Social identity theory was first developed at the start of the 1970s in Britain by Henri Taijfel, out if his scientific and personal interest in social perception, social categorization, and social comparison and prejudice, discrimination, and intergroup conflict. Over the past 30 years social identity theory has attracted many collaborators and followers. It has developed and matures conceptually and has motivated, and continues to motivate, a prodigious quantity research. Although initially a European analysis of intergroup relations, since the early 1990s it has become accepted around the world as one of mainstream social psychology’s most significant general theories of the relationship between self and group. However, this popularity has sometimes brought with it a disjunction between some readings of social identity concept and the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Premise 1: • Group identity, indeed all categories, is socially constructed; • There are no ‘naturally given’ categories; • Notions of social class, race, gender, ethnicity, place and social group emerge from human thought and action.…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    SOC Study Guide

    • 1785 Words
    • 8 Pages

    6) Social Identity: Who we think ourselves to be, socially, impacted by groups we associate with.…

    • 1785 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social identity is a theory formed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner to understand the psychological basis of intergroup discrimination.…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Biology 101

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Task: Your assignment is to consider how your individual identity/self concept*/behaviour been created and influenced by your social relationships and your membership in social groups. You will need to consider the impact of family, peer groups, media, crowds, mass behaviour, and prejudice and discrimination on your social identity.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In our social life, each person has one’s own roles and responsibilities, attitudes and values. Since every individual is unique and distinct compared to one another, these elements that construct our individuality are not always similar. Similarities and reflection of our values make us belong to a group, but the differences are barriers that stop ourselves from being recognized as an indivisible part of it. Belonging and identity are inseparable; nonetheless, there are distinctions that create a world of difference between the two. Belonging is not only about to whom we incorporate ourselves the way we perceive it, but also how others recognize our relationship with that group. Therefore, it can be forged; since we can control our approach to a group, we are able direct the people’s opinion about ourselves. This is because most people observe only what is visible and that is our belonging. Our absolute and real identity remains imperceptible; this is because it is not only about how others recognize us, but also how we identify ourselves as complete individuals. Sometimes belonging comes undesirably and not few deny their relationships with groups which they are born to belong. Even when one’s relationship is not genuine it can still create an impression of belonging, at least for those who are unable to perceive the integrity of that connection. From this pseudo-notion our roles and responsibilities emerge; at this point, belonging and recognition (both personally and socially) dissolve although not completely combine, into a single entity that fits in a considerable part of the identity puzzle as a whole. Hence, in a sense, one can hardly associate and not identify with a group to which one belongs.…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dd307 Tma5

    • 2292 Words
    • 10 Pages

    References: Brown., S.D. (2007) Chapter 6: Intergroup processes: social identity theory, Langdridge, D., Taylor, S., (Eds.), Critical readings in Social Psychology (pp. 134-159). Milton Keynes:The Open University…

    • 2292 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Social identity is defined as a person’s acknowledgement of belonging to a certain social category or group where its members possess the same social identification and observe the surroundings with an individual perspective (Hogg & Abrams 1988, p. 7). To better understand social identity, Social structure needs to be explained, it is defined as the framework of society that was already laid out before we were born. Social structure refers to the typical patterns of a group, such as its usual relationships between men and women or students and teachers. The sociological significance of social structure is that it gives us direction to and sets limits on behaviour (Henslin, J. 2010, pp. 76 – 77). Social interaction is a significant part of life in society also a part of an individual’s social identity, it is the different ways that people interact with one another. Culture lays the broadest framework, while social class divides people according to income, education and occupational prestige. Each of us receives ascribed statuses at birth, that are involuntary that are inherited and later achieved…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Social structure and social interaction are integral in evaluating a person’s identity. Identities are the sets of meanings people hold for themselves that define “what it means” to be who they are as persons, as role occupants and as group members (PJB article) People are generally influenced by the norms and beliefs of society. A person’s identity is formed through a combination of factors derived from social structure (macrosociology) and social interaction (microsociology). The self influences society through the actions…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Social Identity Theory

    • 3208 Words
    • 13 Pages

    A social identity is an element of a person’s self-concept, which is a derivative of a supposed membership in a certain significant social group. The social identity theory, as at first put together by John Turner and Henri Tajfel in the 70s and 80s, was able to introduce the idea of a social identity as a means in which to give an explanation about inter-group behavior (Kolak & Martin, 1991). The social identity theory can best be described as a speculation, which is able to predict specific inter-group relationships and behavior based on known group status distinctions, the apparent stability and authenticity of those status distinctions, as well as the perceived capability of moving from one group to the other. As a result, this concept…

    • 3208 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Howard, Judith A. "Social Psychology of Identities." Annual Review of Sociology 26.No. (2000): 367-93. Social Psychology of Identities. Web. 2015.…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term is defined as a sense of individual that based on his or her group membership (McLeod, 2008). According to Rodriguez and Jaclyn (2015), social identity includes the group connections that are “recognized as being part of the self.” For example, person’s image of herself as a blue-collar worker, or a conservative. It appears that groups give people a sense of social identity and belonging to the social world (McLeod, 2008). Moreover, it could be argued that when people have a sense of belonging to one group, it divides to the different sections, that is, being ‘us’ and being ‘them.’ Therefore, it becomes the in-group and out-group. Furthermore, in-group can possible discriminate against the out-group to enhance their self-image. The in-group and out-group can be shown by, for instance, social class: middle class and working class, or occupation: police and housekeeper (McLeod, 2008). Therefore, social identity is the way people identify themselves which related to other people; for instance, they will identify themselves concerning to religion (Buddhist or Christian), relationship (son, father, brother), and professional (teacher,…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the key points with Social Identity Theory is that in the very act of categorisation, regardless of group contact, in-group preference is produced (Brown, 2000). This then defines a differentiation from out-group members (2000). This group differentiation can lead to the formation of stereotypes. Individuals seek also to…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Realistic conflict theory of prejudice states the increase of prejudice and discrimination are tied to the increase in degree of conflict between in and out-groups when looking for common resources, such as work. Social identity theory states that three processes form a person’s identity within a particular social group and the attitudes, concepts, and behavior that follow the identification of that group. These three processes are: social categorization, social identity, and social comparison. Social categorization is the categorizing of someone socially based on impression formation, which is the first impression someone forms of a stranger. Social identity is the role and category someone is seen to possess socially. Social comparison is when people compare…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Article “Social Identity,” written by Richard Jenkins, he shows us how a person establishes a certain social identity and how people come across views of others. He also makes a strong point to show the reader how some everyday situations let us find out too much about a persons’ social identity. Just as an example, in the text Jenkins explains how an immigration official at an airport is someone who could have access to information about some of the core pieces to your social identity. Jenkins also talks about how a change in situation can really bring forth a persons’ true self-identity and how it can change at any moment. Finally Jenkins talks about how we all naturally judge people and establish impressions. Richard Jenkins main points of the article all help define what social identity is, but ultimately social identity is chosen, established by that person and can very well be changed at any time.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They believed that hostile behaviour was not caused by individual attitudes but by group dynamics. Studies showed that discrimination appears in intergroup comparison even if there is only a minimal difference between the two groups and group boundaries are only based on the minimal difference. This minimal group paradigm shows that mere categorization is sufficient to elicit intergroup discrimination. Social identity theory (Tajfel,1981; Turner,1996; Turner et al., 1987) was basically based on this paradigm, and offered a psychological model. “in situations involving group membership, interpersonal behavior is replaced by intergroup behavior, that is, one’s behavior results not from one’s personal identity but from one’s social identity, therefore intergroup behavior is to be explained based not on group members’ individual attributes but on their social identity ”(Janos L,…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays