Richard A. Epstein puts forth a very convincing argument on selling organs; he brings up many factors which could persuade you to think the way he does on the issue of selling organs. Epstein argues that we should legalize selling organs. He presents both sides of the argument as well as a rebuttal to the opposite side of the issue.…
When it comes to being immoral, opponents also tend to include that it is against their religion. This is a matter of state and religious views that are separate, making this argument is void. With it being immoral, that is hard to understand because currently it is legal to sell ones sperm, blood plasma, and other body parts/functions. It is also legal to use a surrogate mother. If someone wants to sell their own organs, then they should be able to sell their own organs to save a life. Opponents think that there will be businesses that will pursue organs for donation. It will then escalate so bad that people will turn to violence to get organs from people so they can sell them. These opponents think that the government will allow a market without regulations. Of course the government will regulate this. They will have set prices, restrictions which will probably include that the organ seller must also be the organ donor so stealing someone else’s organ would be completely pointless. Another argument made against the market is the fact that the procedure is dangerous. When a donor is making the decision, they’re usually made aware of the dangers and have to sign a waiver. Same will go for those who sell. Opponents also tend to argue that transplants don’t extend a person’s life for that much longer. According to government statistics, the majority of people are still living five years after the operation. Specifically these statistics include 69.3% of kidney operations, 74.9% of the heart, 73.8% of the liver, and 54.4% of the lung. From this, one can conclude that these transplants do help significantly in prolonging one’s life. (Analyses* what does this mean?) This argument the opposition makes can be easily dismissed. (Why can these be…
In MacKay’s essay, “Organ Sales Will Save Lives,” she states that legalizing the sale of human organs will save millions of lives. Instead of prohibiting the sale of human organs, she believes the government should make it legal and manage the process. Kidney transplantation or dialysis is the only treatments available for people suffering from renal failure (MacKay 157). Dialysis is temporary and it has horrific side effects. Whereas, a kidney transplant offers a permanent solution. According to MacKay, there are not many people willing to donate their kidney without some form of compensation (157). Therefore, patients are desperately turning to the black market to purchase a kidney from a living donor. Although…
Compensating donors for organ donations is one of the most controversial debates we have today. The shortage of organ donations in America is the one of the main reason there is a sudden drive to supplement the possible sources of organs. It first began with the move from donations of organs from cadaver to donations from living donors, and no the debate is rerisen, to the possibility of building a market for organ donations with a financial incentive.…
In modern medicine societies, organ transplantation is an opportunity to save peoples’ lives. The downside of organ transplantation is that the demand for organs outweighs the supply. This becomes morally challenging in the context for those who participate in a market as a solution due to the lack of available organs. A market is the selling of organs, which is an unlawful practice in many parts of the world. It is a transaction between those who are seeking for organs to arrange with brokers, and procure organs from those who exist in impoverished, underdeveloped countries. An effort to increase the organ pool is to offer a financial inducement for the organ vendors. The ethical issue of this strategy is that donors no longer participate for altruistic reasons but decide to become vendors, for financial purposes, which means to partake in a commodity for material gain.…
There has always been a debate between creating a legal market for organs rather than accepting the fact that the black market will always exist. If there had to be a decision made regarding the legalization of organ purchases, my answer would be a definite no. Many people can argue and come up with plenty of reasons as to why it should or should not be legalized but in the end the meaning of an “Organ Donor” would be taken away.…
In the essay “Organ Sales Will Save Lives” by Joana Mackay, kidney failure is the main topic in this essay. Honestly, I did not really have an opinion on organ sales. It just knew a bit about it. However, after I read this essay, I felt like I completely agreed with her argument. She argues that the sale of human organs should be legal. As we learned, some key features in an argument include a clear and arguable position, necessary background information, and convincing evidence. In Mackay’s essay, at the very beginning of the essay, she clearly states her position, which is “Governments should not ban the sales of human organs; they should regulate it.” Throughout the entire essay she gives a lot of reasons about why she believe that the sale of human organs should be legal. Also, she pointed out that there is a black market where people can purchase and sell kidney by a very good deal. Meanwhile “there are over 60,000 people on the waiting list for kidneys, and it takes an average of 10 years for your waiting to end”, in black market, they don’t have to wait a line for ten years. This is very surprising. This evidence stood out the most for me because I did not know that people have to wait for 10 year to get a kidney. Furthermore, in the third world countries, they are willing to sell their kidney, which cost about $1000. Sadly, because they need money to by food and clothing for their family, so they are willing to do anything to get money even sale their kidney. It is so sad to know about…
In the essay “Organ Sales Will Save Lives” by Joanna MacKay, kidney failure is the main topic. In her thesis, MacKay states that, “Governments should not ban the sale of human organs; they should regulate it (92).” The thesis is supported by one main reason: it will save lives. In America 350,000 people struggle each year from this situation. MacKay also states that with the legal selling of organs, more people will be willing to give up their kidneys. There are also other ways to save lives like dialysis, but this situation would only be for a temporary time period, transplant is definitely the way to go. People in third world countries are extremely willing to sell their kidneys because they need the money (94). MacKay points out that there is a black market for selling kidneys for $150,000 because it is illegal to sell organs in many countries (93). The broker who arranges the sale, takes advantage of uneducated poor people who are in desperate need of money, only paying them around $1,000 for a kidney (93). People around the world also donate kidneys from the good of their heart; these people have very good moral reasoning’s. She then goes on to talk about the pros and cons of this transplant and how everybody gains except the patient. The workers in the hospitals are paid to do the operation, the person who needs the kidney walks away with one, and the donor is left with nothing. The Government could also regulate this transaction to help make the donors receive money, this way there would be more kidneys up for grab. In her essay Mackay uses statistics and accurate evidence to get through to the readers how she feels about the cause and effect of this operation in modern day.…
Commercialization of organ transplant can lead to health risks to the donor. People who are not fit to donate may offer to donate their organ for the monetary gains. This can result even in the death of the donor. Commercialization of organs may lead to loss of integrity and ethics in the society. People who are mentally unstable may be coerced to donate their organs. The rate of crime will also rise in the society. People will start killing each other so as to obtain the organs (Kanniyakonil, 2005). Commercialization of organs may lead to extortion of patients. This is in the case where an increase in the demand of a given…
During my research I’ve found many pros and cons concerning the commercialization of Organ Transplants. One of the pros would be that it shortens the waiting time for those in need of transplants. For example, if you have been on a waiting list to receive a kidney and there are more donated organs you will receive one quicker to save your life. Another pro for commercializing organ transplants are an individual’s rights to have the freedom to do what they wish with their body organs. Some people might equate this example to abortion stating that the government shouldn’t be able to tell you what to do with your body. During NOTA (National Organ Transplant) act of 1984 “one commentator has argued that the "very existence of a law forbidding alienation of organs paradoxically portrays the human body as 'an article of commerce ' that lies within the purview of Congressional power and would otherwise be subject to sale on the market."(Gwen, Mayes) There are some more pros to these organ transplants such as money incentives for those in financial strain, and tax benefits for the government. Anything that can be sold on the black market, would be more beneficial…
As everyone knows, there are millions of people waiting desperately for an organ to save their life's. Now a days there are countries like Singapore that allows the commercialization of organs for a really high amount. Even though; United States prohibited the option to sell organs for money, I believe that having the option to save other people by selling an organ is a very smart idea. In "Yes, let's Pay for Organs" by Charles Krauthammer; a political columnist, writes an essay to demonstrate that maybe selling organs for a low price would and may help to our society in general.…
Is it time for our society to reconsider the prohibitive laws that make it legally impossible to establish licit markets for bodily organs? So many people are unable to obtain organs they need due to the lack of availability. Increased medical advances have created the need for many more organs than are available (Staff). A commercial market may or may not solve the problem. There is a lack of commitment when it comes to donating organs which could be from fear. Potential donors fear medical personnel will not make every attempt possible to save their lives if they know they are donors. Little do they know, their organs will be available to save 50 more lives in the event of their death. The idea of paying people to sell and purchase human organs has created much controversy over the years. If someone wants to donate their organs, that is acceptable and even admirable. The idea of selling one’s organs for cash is generally deemed medically immoral. It is also immoral to entice people with money to “donate their organs”.…
“Organs for Sale” is an argument written in response to the on-going ethical debate of a market-based incentive program to meet the rising demands of organ transplants. With many on the waiting list for new organs and few organs being offered, the author, Sally Satel, urges for legalization of payment to organ donors. Once in need of a new kidney herself, Sally writes of the anguish she encountered while facing three days a week on dialysis and the long wait on the UNOS list with no prospective willing donors in sight. She goes on to list several saddening researched facts on dialysis patients survival rates, length of time on the UNOS wait list, and registered as well as deceased donor numbers. While Sally is…
The government abolished organ sale and the government can also legalize it. The only reason organ sale hasn't been legalized already is because the issue is so controversial. So many people for some reason feel that it's morally repugnant that someone would be willing to get compensated to go under the knife to save someone's life. Furthermore, there is a big problem that comes with organ sale that can't be ignored. This problem is the black market ,the black market is a reference underground organized crime of all types. In some countries where organ sale is legal and even in ones where it is not the black market continuously gets there hands on human organs and sales them for a huge profit. These organs are usually confiscated from young abducted children and adults or the poor. Criminals in the black market have taken advantage of the organ shortage and are literally making millions of of desperate people in need of organs. Even in the black market it is rare to find the donor compensated. In most cases the donor dies or gets a serious infection because their organ were not harvested in a professional matter and the operation was not done…
The topic of organ transplantation market raises ethical questions regarding the value of human life and the idea of commodifying human organs. Sally Satel on The Organ Donation podcast by EconTalk provided an interesting insight into the transplantation market discourse in the United States. In America, there are approximately 98,000 people on the waiting list for kidneys, but only five thousand are donated annually (Roberts, 2017). Correspondingly, as people wait for kidneys to become available, they receive dialysis treatment which accounts for 6 percent of the annual health budget (Roberts, 2017). Therefore, to solve the ongoing problem of kidney shortages, there is an argument for creating organ transplantation market, where people would…