Preview

Organ Donation Opt-in or Opt-Out That Is the Question

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2523 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Organ Donation Opt-in or Opt-Out That Is the Question
Organ Donation Opt-in or opt-out that is the question This assignment will help us explore and understand the concepts of both the opt-in system of organ and tissue donation and the opt-out system, which I will compare and contrast through looking at both systems used in different countries throughout Europe. And also I will look at how they relate to beneficence and non-maleficence. The opt-in system is based on the view that every person has a choice whether or not to go on the organ donation register, and in this system of donation in most cases the family or another person close of the person who is dying will have the last say whether or not any organs or tissues can be taken. There is then the opt-out system or presumed consent that works on the premise that unless you state that you do not want to donate tissues or solid organs, they can be taken without consent, in most European countries that have this system of donation the families are consulted before any organs or tissues are taken. We will also look at my views and beliefs on organ donation at the start of the essay and how I have come to have them; I probably have a very beneficencial view around the subject, as I would like to think when I die someone else may benefit from my gift of donation. With my old views taken into account I will then strongly critique them, and with an open mind look at the whole picture to see which system I think would be the best option in my opinion, my views may well stay the same as when I first started. Then when I have looked at both systems in depth and got a greater understanding of how they both work, I will try to offer a reflection on how my views, and if they have changed I will convey how this has come about.

Whilst looking at the opt-in and the opt-out systems, we have to bear in mind that both are there for the same reason and that is the saving of lives through donation.

The UK and other countries around Europe, Germany



References:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Pt2520 Unit 1 Assignment

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The assignment requires the student to identify their personal views, and in exploring the relative merits of ‘opt-in’ and ‘opt-out’ approaches to organ donation, demonstrate their personal and academic learning…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This change would increase the number of available organs for transplanting. An opt-out organ donation policy is where everyone is an organ donor, unless they have explicitly indicated that they do not want to be an organ donor. On the other hand, an opt-in organ donation policy indicates that no one is an organ donor unless they have put themselves on the organ donation list. Although, the public opinion is divided on the topic due to moral and ethical issues, the Organization of Organ Transplant Nurses, is in favor of changing to an opt-out policy.…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They will continue as the supply of available donor organs remains small and the profits high. The increasing of the supply of cadaver organs is an obvious solution, but volunteer programs have not produced enough organs to make a difference. Now today some of them leading ethics and saw doctors are explaining The Principle of Informed Consent in the government organ- do not programs. Some of this approach face to face obvious and enormous obstacles, challenging roughly half of a million all around the world suffer kidney failure many are willing to pay a price for a donor organ, as it does widely and deeply held beliefs about the sanctity of the body. In the U.S. presumed consent would be more acceptable than mandatory consent explain how this…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The waiting list for patients in need of organs is growing daily. It is shocking to find that “As of April 13, 2011, there were 110,758 individuals on the waiting list for an organ transplant in the United States” (Cotter, 2011, para 1). This waiting list can be greatly diminished by changing the way we donate and initiating automatic opt-in laws.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As in any business transaction, I feel that anytime money is introduced revolving around a decision, that decision can be skewed and these decisions are made based on the wrong reasons. In the end I understand that each day we have an average of 22 people that die while waiting for appropriate organ to become available and that either cannot that can't take place or they wait for an extended amount of time because of the shortage of donated organs. I just feel that paying someone for their donation, doesn’t really make it a donation, it is basically someone paying for an item they…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    and Living Organ Donation/Transplant Rates in Opt-In and Opt-Out Systems: A Panel Study. 12(131). doi:10.1186/s12916-014-0131-4…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After looking at the data the pros in my opinions out ways the cons when it comes to donation of blood, organs, and even tissue. I believe everyone should be a donator. Once in history religion was the reason that a lot of people did not want to be donators but now most churches allow organ donations. Another reason why more people should sign up to be donator because you never know when you might be the one in need of a…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The final argument against allowing for monetary compensation for organ donation is that many maintain desperate people do desperate things. This means that people may choose to donate even though it is against their better judgement, thus making the action less voluntary. However, medical experts say that there must be a level of consent and understanding for the danger that the donor will undergo during this process. Consent means that they must understand the risks, as well as, the reward and be willing to undergo the process. Any hesitation would undermine consent and would void the process (Wilkinson,…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This system argues that we should assume people prefer to donate their organs if they did not leave a clear indication that they do not. Michael Gill states that,” presumed consent with a provision for family veto is still a superior option, at least at the present time, when a significant portion of the American public lacks full information about organ donation and transplantation” (Gill, p.38). Gill argues due to lack of information and knowledge about organ donation, most people do not leave a clear consent. With presumed consent, organ donation will increase because a high number of people do not have a preference of what happens to their organs. Gill also states, “I believe proponents of presumed consent are right in holding that organ procurement policy ought to be based on the fewer mistakes claim” (Gill, p.43). Interestingly, Gill claims that there is no doubt that the current system and a system of presumed consent will make mistakes regarding respecting individual’s autonomy, and a system of presumed consent will have a fewer mistakes than the current system. People who oppose presumed consent believe that mistaken removals are morally worse than non-mistaken removals. In contrast, Gill argues that both are morally equivalent since they are both invading individual's autonomy. This is important because if presumed consent leads to fewer mistakes than my default it is the better options for because as it respects more the autonomy of individuals. Gill’s autonomy based argument is stating that a system of presumed consent would do a better job that the current system when it comes to respecting individuals wished regarding how they want their bodies to be treated after they…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anotated Bibliography

    • 3241 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Working Thesis: Organ Donors should be able to have the right to choose if their organs after death will be donated to another without any complications even if they die of brain death or euthanasia, inside or outside a medical facility, as well as laws should be put in place or an alternative method stating that their wishes no matter what the family thinks, due to ethical or moral issues, should be honored.…

    • 3241 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Organs Trading

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    If altruism were sufficiently powerful, the supply of organs would be large enough to satisfy the demand, and there would be no need to change the present system. But this is not the case in any country that does a significant number of transplants. While the per capita number of organs donated has grown over time, demand has grown even faster. As a result, the length of the queue for organ transplants has grown significantly over time in most countries, despite exhortations and other attempts to encourage greater giving of organs.…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A compulsory or ‘opt-out’ system would greatly increase the numbers of new, usable organs to save lives. Some people need to wait for up to 4 years for a suitable organ. Australia’s current ‘opt-in’ system simply can’t meet the needs of the thousands of people on the waiting list. It seems illogical to allow people to die when an individual could potentially be saved by none other than organs that are fated to perish in the ground or be cremated along with their body. With a population full of world class surgeons, compulsory organ donation should be a viable option as it would allow the affliction of death to be transformed into a new lease on…

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wendler, D. (January 17, 2001). The Consent Process for Cadaveric Organ Procurement: How Does It Work? How Can It Be Improved? Jama: the Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 3, 329-333.…

    • 2900 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    II. Smirnoff Laura A and Mary B.E.T.H Mercer Quoted; Public Policy Public Opinion and Consent for Organs Donations Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis: Organ and tissue donation isn’t just an important decision for yourself, but it can also impact and save the lives of so many more.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays