Proposal Argument June 20, 2013 US Legislature
Two Deaths or One Life The donation of organs after death is not often a common topic; however, it is a problem that needs addressing. Organ transplantation has become a solution to organ failure, but the rate of failing organs is drastically higher than that of the donors. 118,466 (OPTN: Donor Data, Web) people are currently waiting on life-saving organs, and every ten minutes (The Need is Real, Web) another person is added to that list. It is a rising trend, and 51,701 (OPTN: Donor Data, Web) people were added to the list last year, and only 8,143 (OPTN: Donor Data, Web) people donated their organs after their death. There is simply not enough awareness or concern on this matter, and as such people needlessly die every day. The United States should revitalize the organ donation system by implementing a presumed consent policy, allowing individuals to opt-out if wanted, as opposed to the current method of mandated choice or opt-in, in order to generate more awareness and increase the number of donors. Currently, efforts to increase organ donation include: advertisement, public education campaigns, and a checkbox on a DMV form for a license. Neither is efficient, nor do they provide enough information for the individuals to actually understand what organ donation is and what it includes. When asked whether or not you would save a life if you had the ability, most people would probably answer yes. This is essentially what organ donation does, but most people don’t realize this and so they don’t elect to be one. Some may object to the idea of presumed consent legislation because they fear it would violate human rights, which is a very important factor in considering this solution. It is however void because any individuals who would not want to be a donor could simply opt out. Along with this, in the current system of mandated choice, human rights are violated constantly. Even if a person had registered to be an organ donor, it is not guaranteed, 0as in many cases it is ultimately up to the next of kin. If they do not want their loved one to be a donor, than it is highly unlikely for UNOS to receive any organs. No consideration of what was actually wanted by the patient is taken into place as there is very little time to save viable organs and therefore the next of kin is the deciding factor. Another objection that may be raised to this matter may be the family’s right to make final decisions; however, the constitution makes no allowance for the ownership of a body. It is neither property nor part of an estate, and as such not able to be owned or able to be controlled by an outside source, therefore the organs within a body are not controllable by a family member. In order to protect the right, presumed consent allows donating of all organs unless the patient was to express their want not to donate. This helps to keep the family out of the personal decision and maintains the integrity of the decision. In support of this proposal, the ethics of allowing a person to die if another is able to save them, is unavoidable. With no use to a person who is deceased, there is no reason, other than their direct discretion that should prohibit the transplant of the vital and lifesaving organs. It is imperative that a dying patient should be saved at all costs if possible, and the vanity of the current system does not allow that to happen. It is impossible to tell how many individuals have simply not taken the time to fill out the form to become an organ donor because of the lack of time or simply due to forgetfulness. The lack of opt-in donors in the US is not because they do not want to be one, but rather people are naturally conservative when it comes to doing something, they tend to put it off if it isn’t important to them at the moment. Therefore I believe it is fair to conclude that in general there are more people than are currently listed that if not wanting to donate, are not opposed to the idea. Along with this, the people that do not want to donate, usually feel much more strongly about it, and as such would be likely to opt-out. This theory is very flattering to the idea of presumed consent, as it tends to be more appealing to those with strong opinions, which mandated choice, which tends to leave out a large chunk of the population, does not. Another reason why presumed consent is better than the current system is because the results are not theoretical, but they are known to have a positive effect. Multiple countries in Europe, such as Spain and Austria (Rithalia, Web), have enacted legislation of the same effect, and the results have been phenomenal. The number of donors has surpassed that of the need for organs being added to the list (Rithalia, Web). These countries are leading the way, and why should we not follow a plan that is proven and showing an overall decrease in the number of people on the waiting lists (Rithalia, Web).
No matter what objections may be raised, it is agreed that some drastic change is needed and although many options are viable, this is quite frankly the solution that will produce the quickest results while also being straight forward and easy to put into effect. The US should implement presumed consent in order to help its people that are in dire need of organ donations. It is a rising need and people’s lives are in the balance of this legislation. After all, should two people die if one of them could save the other?
Works Cited
“The Need is Real: Data.” organdonor.gov. Health Resources & Services Administration, n.d. Web. 20 June 2013.
“OPTN: Donor Data.” OPTN: Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Health & Human Services, n.d. Web. 20 June 2013.
Rithalia, Amber. “Impact of Presumed Consent for Organ Donation on Donation Rates: A systematic Review.” BMJ.com. British Medical Journal Group, 14 Jan. 2009. Web. 20 June 20, 2013
Cited: “The Need is Real: Data.” organdonor.gov. Health Resources & Services Administration, n.d. Web. 20 June 2013. “OPTN: Donor Data.” OPTN: Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Health & Human Services, n.d. Web. 20 June 2013. Rithalia, Amber. “Impact of Presumed Consent for Organ Donation on Donation Rates: A systematic Review.” BMJ.com. British Medical Journal Group, 14 Jan. 2009. Web. 20 June 20, 2013
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
a. Almost everyone would want to be able to say, “I have saved a life.” But by becoming an organ donor, you can be able to say, “I will save a life.” Organ donation is a selfless way to give back to others, and to be able to make a huge difference by giving another person a second chance at life. Unfortunately, the number of patients waiting for organs far exceeds the number of people who have registered to become organ donors. Patients are forced to wait months, even years for a match, and far too many die before they are provided with a suitable organ. There are many stigmas related to organ donation, but most of them are relatively false, and in order to be well informed, you must know what organ donation is, how it works as well as how you can become an organ donor and what organs or tissues you can donate. Becoming an organ donor after death is not only an important decision for yourself, but it is also an important decision for the life that you may have the power to save. (Finn, Robert)…
- 417 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Fairness is a great solution to this epidemic. By fairness, I mean whoever doesn’t donate won’t be a priority when it comes to the waiting list. People will be forced to give up a piece or whole organ to become a higher priority patient in the future. If one doesn’t then it is considered organ free-riding, a morally wrong action to do. This is a term stated by Steinberg, one of the critics against this current U.S. organ policy. Steinberg believes that everyone should do what they would others to do when they are in the same situation. He states,…
- 806 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Saving Lives According to the National Health Service, there are two types of organ donations, living and deceased. Nobody realizes what the numbers are and how many there are suffering. “Currently, nearly 124,000 men, women and children are awaiting organ transplants in the United States.” (Organ 1) According to The U.S Department of Health and Human Services, a person is added to the list every ten minutes. 79 people every day are saved by organ donation. (Need1) However, 22 people die waiting for a transplant because of a shortage of organs. (Need 1) Everyone will die one of two ways, either their heart will fail, or they will go brain dead. Many lives could be saved if people would step up and help. One 13-year-old girl helped saved 8 lives after passing from a brain hemorrhage. Jemima Layzell told her parents she wanted her body to help save others in the event of her death. “Her heart has gone to a five–year–old boy, a 14–year–old was given her lungs and her liver helped two boys, aged 10 months and five. Two people received her kidneys, a man was given her pancreas and her small bowel went to a boy, three.”(Teenage1) People who are willing to donate have a huge heart.…
- 1536 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Certain people cannot be organ donors because Many people have to wait a long time for to have a organ donation, so it’s important to have more people donating their organs.…
- 838 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Compensating donors for organ donations is one of the most controversial debates we have today. The shortage of organ donations in America is the one of the main reason there is a sudden drive to supplement the possible sources of organs. It first began with the move from donations of organs from cadaver to donations from living donors, and no the debate is rerisen, to the possibility of building a market for organ donations with a financial incentive.…
- 949 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Organ donation for transplantation has become altruistic worldwide. All organ donations have become altruistic, meaning that there are no financial incentives to people who are willing to have their organs or organs of their deceased family members used for transplants. During the past two decades, advances in immunosuppressive therapy has led to greater success in transplantation and to increased numbers of patients on transplant waiting lists. Instead of donating organs people can start selling them it could potentially become as charitable as donating. People could gain a little cash from it. Besides that America has one of the highest waiting list besides China for organ transplants. There are not enough donations to extinguish the growing waiting list. The shortage of transplant organs is a major worldwide public health problem. According to the US Department of Health and Human Services Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, there are approximately 123,000 patients on transplant waiting lists in the US and around 300,000 patients waiting for an organ transplant in China (The Economist…
- 511 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Currently, the need for organ donors is greater now than ever before. According to the United Network for Organ Sharing, UNOS, in the United States alone…
- 575 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Saving Lives When Is It Ethical The decision to be an organ donor is not an easy decision to make, but the donor has the easiest part of the donation process. The decision of when to extract the organs usually falls on the family and the attending physician. The question since organ donation began has always been when are you really dead? This one question has been an ongoing controversy not only with the public, but with churches, and the government as well. The government has tried to put rules in place to help make the decision of when donor removal is ethical. One such rule is called the dead donor rule, which states that the patient must be declared dead before the removal of any vital organs for transplantation (Robert D. Troug M.D.).…
- 1559 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Thesis Statement: The need is constantly growing for organ donors and it is very simple to be an organ donor when you die.…
- 1251 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The Ethics Organ Donation after Cardiac Death Organ donation over the past twenty years has almost more than doubled, but the fact remains that the demand of organs is still dwarfed by the supply. For about 75% of organs that are transplanted, those organs come from deceased donors. Most recently, the highest increase in organ recovery has come from donors that have suffered cardiac death. Cardiac death is declared on the basis of cardiopulmonary criteria of permanent cessation of circulatory and respiratory function and not on the basis of neurological criteria of irreversible loss of all functions of the entire brain, used to declare brain death (Steinbrook, 2007). According to the ‘dead donor rule’ donation should not cause or quicken death, because of the way donation after cardiac death is practiced, it unavoidably raises more concerns…
- 1438 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
It it thought that if two components of transplantation legislation, presumed consent and allocation priority, it will increase the donor population. (Alejandra,. 2015) In order to increase the amount of donations, something like…
- 964 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Another ethical issue is the fear that policies to maximize organ donations in an opt-out organ donation system, could go too far – leading to premature declarations of death in order…
- 244 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
They will continue as the supply of available donor organs remains small and the profits high. The increasing of the supply of cadaver organs is an obvious solution, but volunteer programs have not produced enough organs to make a difference. Now today some of them leading ethics and saw doctors are explaining The Principle of Informed Consent in the government organ- do not programs. Some of this approach face to face obvious and enormous obstacles, challenging roughly half of a million all around the world suffer kidney failure many are willing to pay a price for a donor organ, as it does widely and deeply held beliefs about the sanctity of the body. In the U.S. presumed consent would be more acceptable than mandatory consent explain how this…
- 549 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Firstly, the demand for organs is higher than supply. In the United States, more than 80,000 people are in the waiting list for organ transplant. Almost 28,000 people’s organs were transplanted in 2005. So, many people think government needs to make it compulsory for people to donate their organs when they die. Patients will still have chance to live.…
- 496 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
United States[edit] Over 100,000 Americans are on the waiting list in need of an organ. This crisis within the United States is growing rapidly because on average there are only 30,000 transplants performed each year. More than 6,000 people die each year from lack of a donor organ, an average of 19 people a day. Between the years 1988 and 2006 the number of transplants doubled, but the number of patients waiting for an organ grew six times as large. It has been estimated that the number of organs donated would double if every person with suitable organs decided to donate. In the past presumed consent was urged to try to decrease the need for organs. The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act of 1987 was adopted in several states, and allowed medical examiners to determine if organs and tissues of cadavers could be donated. By the 1980s, several states adopted different laws that allowed only certain tissues or organs to be retrieved and donated, some allowed all, and some did not allow any without consent of the family. In 2006 when the UAGA was revised, the idea of presumed consent was abandoned. In the United States today, organ donation is done only with consent of the family or donator themselves.[5]…
- 759 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays