Opposing Embryonic Stem Cell Research

Topics: Stem cell, Cellular differentiation, Embryonic stem cell Pages: 5 (1763 words) Published: October 7, 2005
Opposing Embryonic Stem Cell Research
Stem cell research has a lot to offer in the way of treatments, or even cures to some devastating diseases that humans face. However, research using human embryonic stem cells that can only be obtained by killing a human embryo can not be condoned or paid for by the United States Government. Federal funding needs to focus on the adult stem cell research that has already been proven successful and can be obtained without destroying a human life.

Ethics and morals need to be considered when the destruction of one human life is acceptable so that another human may live. The first thing to differentiate is that it is ethical to experiment on human tissue, but those experiments on human beings are not ethical. Therefore, it is perfectly ethical to proceed with any and all types of stem cell research as long as human tissue is being used, but it is completely unethical to do embryonic stem cell research, which by its very nature necessitates the killing of a living human embryo to obtain that stem cell (Willke). Science has shown that embryos contain all the necessary parts to grow into a living, breathing human. To understand this we must first review early development biology. J. C. Willke writes: Human life begins at the union of sperm and ovum. During that first day, this is properly termed a "fertilized egg." However, this single-celled human body divides, divides, and divides again, so that nearing the end of the first week this embryo, now called a "blastocyst," numbers several hundred cells. After the first day, a number of names apply to various developmental stages of the same living human, fertilized egg, or zygote (a single cell), a blastocyst (many cells), embryo, fetus, infant, child adolescent, etc. During the first week, this tiny new human floats freely down his or her mother's tube, dividing and sub-dividing as the journey is made. At about one week of life, he or she plants within nutrient lining of the woman's uterus. In about three more days, having sent roots into the wall of the uterus, this new human sends a chemical hormonal message into the mother's blood stream and this stops her menstrual period. Four days later, the embryonic heart begins to beat and three weeks after that, brain waves are measurable. The biologic fact is that from day one, inside and then outside of the uterus, this is one continuous, uninterrupted period of growth and development. Human embryos are not mere clusters of cells; they are the tiniest of human beings. Thus, we have a moral responsibility to not harm them. When embryos are being killed, it is a form of murder on human life. Nancy L. Jones, cell biologist at Wake Forest Baptist, "Before asking ‘can we do it?' scientists should ask ‘should we do it'?" (qtd. in "Time") In order to develop an opinion on whether or not stem cells should be used, one first must understand what they are and how they are used. Simply stated, the definition of a stem cell is an undifferentiated cell, meaning that it has no true function yet. However, all of the genes within a human stem cell have the potential to become other types of cells. The triggering mechanism for this is for the stem cells to be placed among specialized cells. Specialized cells include skin cells, muscle cells, or any other type of cell that has a specific function in the body. Many expansive claims have been made on the benefits of embryonic stem cell research, but the truth is that embryonic stem cell research has not helped a single human being or demonstrated any therapeutic benefit. Steven Ertelt reported "Initial trials involving fetal stem cells have proven disastrous, with some patients going into convulsions following injections of embryonic stem cells. The results have been so devastating, in fact, that some scientists are calling for a halt to all embryonic stem cell research" ("President Bush"). Embryonic stem cells have just not proven successful....

Cited: lifenews.com. Ed. Steven Ertelt. "President Bush Still Opposes Embryonic Stem Cell Research." 09 June 2004. 16 Apr. 2005 .

Mackay-Sim, Alan. CNN.com. 22 Mar. 2005. Griffith University. 20 Apr. 2005 .
News-Medical.net. "Time for Ethical Reflection is Before Experimentation Begins". 16 Mar. 2005. 20 Apr. 2005 .

ScienceDaily.com. "Researcher Takes Stem Cell Research Another Step." 11 Apr. 05. New Jersey Institute of Technology. 20 Apr. 2005 .

Willke, J C. lifeissues.org. Life Issues Institute, Inc. 09 Apr. 2005 .
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Essay about Embryonic Stem Cell Research
  • Embryonic Stem Cell Research Essay
  • Essay about Embryonic Stem Cells for Research: A Debate
  • embryonic stem cell research Essay
  • Controversies of Stem Cell Research Essay
  • Essay on Embryonic Stem Cell
  • Embryonic vs Adult Stem Cell Research Essay
  • Essay about Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free