Preview

Open Protest Pros Cons

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
99 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Open Protest Pros Cons
The Pros article Says that athletes should go about these shows and show there disagreement with they people are treated in America at these sports event. The Cons article shows that even though the athletes should stand up against racism etc. They should not do it public at sports events as that disrespects the country more then the few people who are doing the injustice. I would support the claims from the pros article as while as some people do believe open protest is the way to solve these issues but in many cases this only makes things

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The opinion piece, “The Athlete as Agent of Change,” by Lonnie Bunch and David Skorton discusses how athletes use their platform to address injustice. “Sport has always been a way used to challenge convention.”(Bunch and Skorton, paragraph 3). Athletes have the power and ability to change an idea or convince people of their ideas. The position they are in allows them to use their fame to promote their beliefs and causes they support. I believe that athletes should use their fame to promote a political agenda. One reason why athletes should use their fame to promote a political agenda is because athletes’ platforms allow them to easily persuade or sway the fans and audience to the idea they support. “Sport is a powerful way to do so because…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Athletes need to use their status to make an impact and show that even the most famous people care. First of all, Kaepernick is not the only one to take a stand. In one of the Articles given, a piece of information was stated and here I quote, “At a sports award show, basketball stars Carmelo Anthony, Lebron James, Dwyane Wade, and Chris Paul took the stage and talked about the issues in the world, as a Country we are having. This shows that there is more people out there that think the same, so we should fix it. In addition, Athletes weren’t always cheated good after they took a stand. In one of the articles, a piece of information also stated, “Smith and Carlos were stripped of their Olympic Medals, Muhammad Ali was banished from boxing for years for refusing to fight in the Vietnam war.”. It is wrong for them to be punished if they were really trying to help this country solve our problems. One more thing, Athletes didn’t always agree with each other. Here is a Quote from one of the Articles, “In 1968, Martin…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The authors thoroughly explain what and why this is occurring and how much it affects communities. They used tons of sources to help back their opinion and really put out the word of how sports tourism can really impact an area. Also, how the climate is usually the factor of cancellations and poor appearances. This article really showed me how much the climate has an impact of events, and how it stops tourism and economical benefits in the event area. This has opened my eyes a little to see how many events occur, and how many situations that that events has to handle and plan…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imagine being penalized for performing an action within the rights of all American citizens. Athletes are being punished for using their platform and not standing for the National Anthem. However, standing for the anthem is not a required action American citizen must do by law. Standing for the national anthem is an acti9n U.S. citizens are expected to do. However, athletes are not standing for the anthem to make a political statement about a belief. Furthermore, athletes should have a choice to stand for the National anthem without being…

    • 90 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are acts of civil disobedience ever appropriate? According to American history, acts of disobedience in the face of tyranny are not only appropriate but expected. The very fabric of this nation was shaped by acts of civil disobedience and rebellion. Human morality is not always defined by governmental regulations and when those regulations are in direct defiance of morality, it is the people’s obligation to stand with their beliefs and change the government.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King believes that certain preparations should occur before one participates in direct civil disobedience, including attempting to first negotiate; “In ANY non-violent campaign there ARE four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine if whether injustice exist, negotiation, self-purification and direct action”. These steps serve as a framework for correctly practicing civil disobedience, failing to abide by this framework neglects the alternatives to creating civil unrest. Mindful of the importance of negotiation in constructively breaking the law, Socrates forms his MAIN argument off of the inability to control the ensuing chaos if he WE re to break the law after failing to negotiate. While personifying the law, Socrates speaks for…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King, Jr. Colin Kaepernick. Malcolm X. Rosa Parks. Huey P. Newton. These individuals are famous for their work in protesting, but the methods of conveying a message differs greatly between these influential figures. The spectrum ranges from taking a knee during the national anthem to armed protests. Although many people think that violent protesting is an effective means to spark change, the truth is that peaceful dissent prevails as the superior catalyst to combat injustice.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Civil disobedience is a form of protest in which protesters deliberately violate a law” (suber). It is a way for society to reform itself to reflect its current values while maintaining its fundamental ideals. Some may argue civil disobedience is a “slippery slope” leading to anarchy or it cannot be justified in a democracy. Civil disobedience, while not optimum, is a way to accomplish change with the intent of reform and stabilizing communities.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution protects the people’s right to assemble and express their opinion freely. The protests were widely criticized by the American public, especially recently due to president Donald Trump’s recent comments. He said that these players were being unlawful and should be jailed or fired. This is a reoccurring problem with…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful Protest

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Peaceful Protest and civil disobedience have been a hallmark of change from the early 20th century onwards. Though nonviolent efforts, multiple civil movements have peacefully broken a law in order to protest an injustice of said law. Usually done in a coordinated manner by a large group of people, these protest have been strikingly effective in bettering the systems they have set out to change. Peaceful resistance is therefore one of the most effective ways of protesting and correcting unjust and broken laws, and is a staple of free society.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many other ways people can express the way they think about the whole situation. The athletes should spend time outside of being under the camera and make a difference in their community if they want change so bad. These athletes have an impact on adults and the youth on what they should believe in. Athletes should not be allowed to express their own beliefs during games as workers are not allowed to preach their beliefs to their customers.Should these athletes be using the platform such as the NFL, to promote the social injustices that the minorities are faced with in today's…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Critics have bashed these players for “disrespecting the flag” and “disrespecting the military” when that is not what they are aiming to do. They want to get their message across and they feel like the best way to display it is by protesting on a national stage. Players simply want to bring awareness to the ongoing issue of police brutality towards African Americans and the racial injustice that comes along with it. Critics of the protest have also called players “un-American.” That is completely false because they are doing the most American thing anyone can do by peacefully protesting for what they believe in. They are not inflicting any harm on people. They are not raiding cities and causing disturbances, like the protesters in Charlottesville did when they rioted the streets carrying tiki torches and beating up innocent civilians while spitting out hateful pro-White rhetoric. They are just kneeling, sitting or locking arms instead of standing. The players showcased their unity to the entire country, even when their own President shows his hatred towards them by…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience is a vital and necessary part of life in a democratic system of government. It serves to keep the government from overstepping its bounds. There are times in the history of countries where the governing body has become complacent and has begun to violate the rights of their citizens. Civil disobedience is an effective way of discouraging and preventing such transgressions. Without the threat of dissidence from the public, there is nothing to keep governments honest except for the honor of those governments, which is highly questionable even in the noblest of nations. The role of elected officials in the United States is to represent their constituents, be they from their district, state, or party. If there is nothing to hold these politicians to this purpose, can we truly be sure they are ruling in a representative way and not in self interest?…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1849, Henry David Thoreau disgusted by slavery and the injustices of the Mexican-American War wrote “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience”, where he states that civil disobedience is the deliberate defiance of a law to in order to change government policy or enact social reform. Civil disobedience was a major proponent in the women’s suffrage movement, Mohandas Gandhi’s campaign for independence in India, the civil rights movement in the USA, and the abolition of apartheid in South Africa. However there is a school of thought that sees civil disobedience as a major problem due to it seemingly advocating disorder. In most cases peaceful resistance to certain laws can have a positive impact. Civil disobedience has been the platform in which…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that peaceful civil disobedience is beneficial to society. The main reason I believe this is because it brings issues to light that the public would not have known about otherwise. It makes headlines, and if it is truly an issue worth changing then the public will make their opinion known and, if things work out, the underlying issue will be solved. The downside being that the civil disobedience may have harmed business or government briefly by breaking the law. I think that the trade off is worth it, even if nothing gets changed the public is still more aware of what is going on in their government, and that is always a good thing. However, if the civil disobedience becomes violent, it basically always has the opposite effect, and…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays