Preview

Open Markets And Political Freedom Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
889 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Open Markets And Political Freedom Analysis
Question 1: Is there a relationship between open markets and political freedom?

I think that the there is a relationship between open markets and political freedom. Open markets are defined as an unrestricted market with free access by and competition of buyers and sellers. This is a competitive market and need people to participate in this market. According to the Commanding of Heights notes, Milton Friedman was asked why are free markets and freedom inseparable. His first response to that question was that “freedom requires individuals to be free to use their own resources in their own way, and modern society requires cooperation among a large number of people”. He is talking about how people being free and being allowed to invest in things
…show more content…
If there wasn’t political freedom, in my opinion, open markets would not exist because everything would be controlled by the government in which the market wouldn’t need to be open because no one could participate in the market without going through the government. This is one reason why I think the relationship is so important between open markets and political freedom. Another question that was asked to Friedman was “Why, in your view, is private property so central to freedom?” He responded by saying, ”because the only way in which you can be free to bring your knowledge to bear in your particular way is by controlling your property. If you don't control your property, if somebody else controls it, they're going to decide what to do with it, and you have no possibility of exercising influence on it.” This goes back to what I said about how if the government controlled people in a way that they didn’t have the freedom to participate in the open markets, this would kill the open markets because there would be none because going off what Friedman said, open markets are caused by people having the freedom to own things and if that freedom is taking away, …show more content…
During 1914, capital was free to flow from one country to another and this made the market flourish. Trade was going on smoothly between the United states and European countries as well as many other participating markets. When World War I started, this all changed because of Europe. The European market had to become a closed exchanged and their main focus was the war. This caused the stock market to shut down and it was crazy. According to Bryan Taylors Articled titled “Desperate Traders Managed To Keep Trading During The World War I Stock Market Shutdown”, the war drove stock prices down. He says in his article that even though stocks could not be traded on the main exchanges, over the counter markets replaced for those who were desperate enough to sell. During this time, people wanted their money and most were looking to sell in case the stock market would collapse and they wouldn’t get to see that money forever so this led to the decline in the prices of share prices. Taylor states that “in Europe, the problem of preventing catastrophic declines in stock prices was solved by putting a floor on share prices.” This means that no matter how desperate someone was, they could not sell shares below a certain price so this made sure the European market didn’t collapse. Taylor also states that “the government also placed restrictions on capital, limiting or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    * Second two-party system – evolution of political organizations in 1824 into the Jacksonians and the Whigs.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Great Depression Dbq

    • 1939 Words
    • 8 Pages

    For industry, the 1920s had been marked by prolonged prosperity. This was particularly notable in the field of construction and other capital production. During this period, there was an unusually large expansion of credit because of easy-credit policies which resulted in increased profits (Soule 1947). As often happens following a period of prosperity, cumulative strains brought about a downturn in the economy. The production of the nation exceeded its capacity to consume. Since there were no restrictions by the Federal Reserve Board, too much credit was used for speculation on the market (Soule 1947). In the second place, the economies of many countries were still suffering from dislocations caused by World War I. Although the world had begun to resume its normal progress, the international economy remained unstable. After receiving help with its trade deficits, war debts, and reparation obligations, Western Europe became financially dependent on the United States (Hacker and Zahler…

    • 1939 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ecn 211

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself.”…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Kellogg-Briand Pact

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages

    On December 7, 1917, the United States officially declared war on Austria-Hungary, formally marking their entry into the long and destructive First World War. Despite the United States’ delayed involvement in the war, over 320,000 American soldiers were still wounded or killed. Following the United States’ participation in World War I, a definitive shift in foreign policy drew the country to a renewed period of illusory security through isolationism. Less than 12 years later, on October 5, 1929, the stock market experienced a devastating crash that led to years of turmoil and unemployment. In addition to the isolationism that came out of the First World War, the succeeding economic depression of the 1930s encouraged Americans to focus even…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This essay is a short critique of the theory by Milton and Rose Friedman, "Free to choose: A personal statement", focusing on chapter 1. I will argue that Friedman is right in saying, "… voluntary exchange is a necessary condition for both prosperity and freedom" but that there are shortcomings in his theory. Voluntary exchange is defined as a trade of something which is done with both persons consent. For instance a problem with the theory Milton Friedman expresses through voluntary exchange is; how voluntary is a voluntary exchange when looked at in certain conditions. I will attempt to show that the prosperity and freedom promised by Friedman's theory has not been achieved by everyone. Friedman has many shortcomings and this essay will outline and criticise them, focusing mainly on his assumption of power, choice and market efficiency. This essay also addresses the issues of globalisation, as this is a concept also talked about by Friedman in his essay and is also relevant in neoliberal theory. Neoliberal theory is, "an updated version of classical political economy that is dedicated to market individualism and minimal statism." As I point out in the essay these dedications are not thoroughly adhered to by businesses for which this theory is supposed to entail. The first topic will be on choice followed by power and market efficiency. Andrew Heywood says of Milton Friedman, "The free-market view, advanced by theorists such as Hayek and Friedman, holds that general prosperity is best achieved by a system of unregulated capitalism." This essay also hopes to prove that this assumption is false.…

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A lot of people started to invest in stocks, during the 1920s, when everything was going great (DocJ)! Everyone was making profit, sharing profits, basically gambling with their stocks (DocF). However, stocks can go up simply because buyers believed they will be able to sell the stock for more next week or next month. Most of the time investors were eager to invest in the stock so some of them bought there’s on credit. That is the investor pays a certain percent and the broker gets the rest of the money from the bank (DocG). But at the end everyone lost. Why because of speculation, the stock market crashed. The stock market was trigged by British who raised their interest rates in an effort to bring back capital lured abroad by American investments (DocD). Foreign investors and wary domestic-speculators began to dump their “insecurities” and orgy of selling followed. People began to panic and sell. Two months after the crash-stock holders had lost 40 million paper values or more than the total cost of war to the U.S. That was a major cause of the Great depression because a lot of people lost money because of the crash.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    York's banks were in debt to the Federal Reserve by $64million. Warning signs began to…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the summer I choose to read The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad by Fareed Zakaria, published by W.W. Norton& Company Inc. New York, New York © 2007. This is a unique and intricately assembled collection of 270 pages of opinions, facts, and theories depicting the authors view on what else, democracy in its past present and future state at home and abroad. Democracy is a word with a million meanings: free and equal representation of the people; political and social equality; and a tool or system for trade and economy. Zakaria starts by briefly explaining how democracy has come about, and its origination in the west, and how geographical features such as location (for example the move of the capital to Constantinople), along with its long history and ever changing politics have led to be the building blocks of what we see democracy as today. Liberal institutions and culture were just as important to the growth of freedom in the West as democracy. I also took note that the democracy in terms of what I see and have been taught to view as, is that with democracy comes happiness and equality, each person is important and has a say in our government. Although this book has really opened my eyes in the sense it showed me that democracy wasn’t and isn’t always the right tool to use when trying to fix or setup a government and its policies and is certainly not the ticket to freedom. Civil society was a key element in the stability and development of freedom and democracy; also that economic freedom and political freedom are intertwined. Each government and country was formed differently, not one I don’t think has the exact same history, politics, culture, or philosophy. Sometimes the idealistic features tacked onto democracy don’t always flow correctly in sync with human growth, nature, and cultures. “Geography and history combined to help shape Europe’s political structure”…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The American economy has been one of the world’s greatest economies, because of its adaptation of the free market system. This economy allows people to somewhat do what they want to do in business. If you want to open a business, and have the money and knowledge to do so, the freedom is there to do so. The same way for the consumers (us); we somewhat have the freedom to buy and sell in our economy. This system embraces the private sector, which is the people, rather than the public sector, the government. However, in recent years, this economy has started to embrace views that command, socialistic, and communistic economies embrace. There has been more government control in the economy, which means less freedom for people to start their own business or less to gain from workmanship. Without entrepreneurship and workmanship, an economy cannot survive well.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism and Freedom, written by Milton Friedman, seems to focus significantly on the connections between the economics and politics, and the effect that those have in various aspects of society. This relationship was referred to throughout the book, and the topics Friedman discusses ranged between governmental control of money, to foreign policy and trade and the effect that has on our economy. Through the course of the book, Friedman constantly refers to his “classical liberal” view, which focuses on the freedoms and power of the individual in society. Friedman shows his support of this view during the book using the idea of a laissez-faire government. For Freidman, government involvement in issues regarding society should be minimized, and the government should only really use their power to assist society when things are not going well. Friedman believes that government should only be the most basic form of overseer of the nation. The thought of the free market driving the economy strongly prevails within the book. He claims that the government should only be there to reduce the inevitable rises and falls of the economy when it is free market based. This way, the changes in the market will be able to remain less drastic. Friedman refers to the capitalist system as an unstable form of economy, and that government should be more of a support structure, rather than the basis of the economic system. He strongly believes that too much governmental influence would restrict our rights and liberties. This belief was one of his main focuses through the entire book. Friedman states in the introduction “Our minds tell us, and history confirms, that the great threat to freedom is the concentration of power.” (Pg. 2)…

    • 2518 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To start with, Friedman’s failure to organize his thoughts weaken his argument that “capitalism is a necessary condition for political freedom.” When arguing an idea, one must capture their audience’s attention. Friedman had agreeable ideas, however his thoughts were unorganized, making it challenging for his audience to stay focused. Friedman gives an example to support his theory that capitalism is essential to have total freedom using the Amish. He explains that the Amish “regarded compulsory federal old age programs as an infringement of their individual freedom and refused to pay taxes or accept benefits.” He goes on to explain the result of their refusal, but then changes from the injustice of social programs and talks about laws that put restrictions on economic affairs. These two ideas are different, therefore they should not be expected to flow together. To make a good argument, ideas should be complete and link back to the question that is being argued.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Commanding Heights

    • 15756 Words
    • 64 Pages

    What happens when national governments restrict their domestic economies from open participation in (and dependence on) foreign trade?…

    • 15756 Words
    • 64 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “The Land of the Free”, there are many questions upon the government. Citizens often find themselves lost in politics. One day after another, people rant on social media about “fake news”, and they whine because they were offended by someone else’s statement. Political leaders are often said to be too political, the wealthy are portrayed as greedy hotheads, the minorities are represented as irresponsible and effortless, and the people who are not engaged are labeled as the quiet cowards along the sideline. In Civil Disobedience, Thoreau recognizes one of the most important political complaints today; The government has too much control.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the Great Depression, there were few regulations that controlled the stock market. Stockholders were able to speculate and buy shares of stocks on margin or use money that they had borrowed. According to Encyclopedia.com, “Speculation in stock means to buy stock with the assumption that it can always be sold at a profit…Buying on margin means that a person purchases a…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Do you think the Government should intervene in the labour market in a free market economy? Explain why or why not.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays