Preview

Only Democratic States Can Solve Global Problems Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
949 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Only Democratic States Can Solve Global Problems Case Study
“Only democratic states can solve global problems”
Democratic states can influence in an important way when solving global problems. On the other hand, non-democratic states can contribute as well. This essay will argue the existence of other factors on whether a state can solve a global problem regime being democratic or not. The ones able to solve global problems are developed countries, who either have a fairly-advanced democracy or a stable politics regard-less the political regime. We must admit that nations with a progressive political ideology are most often countries with democracy thus being the ones able to solve global problems.
In order to solve global problems, it is essential to have a stable economy. Nevertheless, this can
…show more content…
(United Nations 2015) Thus giving the global south no opportunity whatsoever to resolve own national problems nor solve the global problems. This then resulting into global north with a great market-economy becoming the only ones able to solve the global problems.

According to Chomsky (2010), globalization is international integration, however it now stand in the way of (specially)developed countries in solving global problems. The World Trade Organization (WTO) identi-fy the globalization as necessary, through consumerism, hence a united world with no barriers and there-fore, making consumerism a prioritization. Globalization is the results of a world where Adam Smith (2002), argues that “the society itself grows to be what is properly a commercial society.”

This creates a clash with global problems for instance the environmental issue. Despite of civil-disobedience in form of popular movement as COP21 being held in 2015 or previous cops held around the world, no action towards change is being taken due to the risk of falling behind

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Print ECN 340

    • 586 Words
    • 1 Page

    Strengthen the commonality of interest of the world economy have a positive impact on the world political integration process through peaceful means.…

    • 586 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What exactly is meant by the term “democracy”? According to the rich and long history of democracy itself, it is doubtful that there is an appropriate and comprehensive definition of democracy exists. However, by studying the formation of democracy, there is a common agreement that the term “democracy” consists of the following characteristics: “regular free and fair elections, universal suffrage, and accountability of the state's administrative organs to the elected representatives, and effective guarantees for freedom of expression and association as well as protection against arbitrary state actions.” (Holden) Then, one could see the key term of democracy is the representation of the political system. In order to examine and question the “level of democracy” in the contemporary Northern states, it is necessary to analyze the representation of democracy, in particular, the implementation of new policies and remaining difficulty of democracy of Great Britain and France.…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Democratic Peace theory, known as the “democracies seldom if ever go to war against another” states simply that there is a relative absence of war between states which foster the system of democracy. This thesis has already established itself as an undeniable axiom for the US foreign policy which could be effortlessly traced in the President Clinton’s address of 1994 for the State of the Union: “Democracies don’t attack each other” and “ultimately the best strategy to insure our security and to build a durable peace is to support the advance of democracy elsewhere.” This theory nurtures the idea that the absence of wars between democracies culminates into the maintenance of peace and security in the international scene. Yet, the concept of democratic peace, like other conspicuous concepts, entails contention; if the democratic peace theory has been valorized by proponents like Bruce Russett, John Owen and Michael Doyle; on the other side, it has not escape the extensive criticism of opponents like Christopher Layne, David Spiro, Henry Farber, Joanne Gowa, Ido Oren, Edward Mansfield and Jack Snyder. If on one side, Russett states that the Democratic Peace Theory is “one of the strongest nontrivial of non-tautological generalizations that can be made about international relations”, on the other side, Christopher Layne counteracts it by: “in a realist world, survival and security are always at risk, and democratic states will respond no differently to democratic rivals than to non-democratic ones.” Thereby, the debate of the Democratic Peace announces more to be an inquisitive contest between realism and liberalism and this essay is going to embark in the task of framing the Democratic Peace Theory by a critical assemblage of the intricate views proposed by both the proponents and opponents of this theory.…

    • 2454 Words
    • 71 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Chan, Steve. “In Search of Democratic Peace: Problems and Promise.” Mershon International Studies Review 41 (1997): p. 60…

    • 3147 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Globalization is the system of interaction among the countries of the world in order to develop the global economy. “Globalization refers to the integration of economics and societies all over the world. Globalization involves technological, economic, political, and cultural exchanges made possible largely by advances in communication, transportation, and infrastructure (Hubpages, 2009).”…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the threshold of 21st century, international communities have been drastically globalised or internationalised as the World Trade Organisation (WTO), which is the successor to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), launched in 1995. As many countries agreed to open to foreign intercourse, international trade, financial markets and foreign investment have been rapidly grown as well as the changes in culture have been undergone. The term ‘globalisation’, in this manner, refers to ‘a process of increasing international dependence in which countries become more integrated with one another economically and culturally.’ (Bentley et al., 1999, p.177) It is generally supposed that the origin of current globalisation was from the end of the Cold War. The American president in the late 1980s, George H. W. Bush, proclaimed ‘new world order’ which involved that “countries would cooperate peacefully as participants in one worldwide market, pursuing their interests while sharing commitments to basic human values.” (Lechner and Boli, 2004, p.7) In other words, economic and political interdependence would lead to more shared interests, which would help to grow economy and create both wealth and solidarity. The spread of market-orientated policies and individual rights promised to improve the well-being of billions of people. However, this positive perspective on globalisation has been strongly criticised by many socialists who see globalisation as the latest stage in the development of international capitalism. They have been argued that globalisation is westernization by another name, that is, it undermines the social and cultural unity of other cultures and is therefore exploitative, oppressive and harmful to most people in many places, especially in developing countries. Moreover, surprisingly, even developed countries are also undergoing some disadvantages from globalisation, leading to social problems. As Waters (1995) suggested, therefore,…

    • 2640 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Globalization is the process by which different societies and cultures integrate through a worldwide network of political ideas through transportation, communication, and trade. Generally, globalization has affected many nations in various ways; economically, politically, and socially. It is a term that refers to the fast integration and interdependence of various nations, which shapes the world affairs on a global level. Simply put; globalization is the world coming together. In this essay I will discuss multiple perspectives on globalization through the analysis of these three sources.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, in terms of economy Democracy may not necessarily lead to great economic development. Democratic governments have a limit to how much they can oppress economic contributing factors like predation. Dictatorships usually have a better control over their people; only allowing them to promote factors which they think would grow their economy. However, Democracy leads to a situation whereby the economic growth cannot be totally enforced by the government onto the people as everyone is supposed to have equal rights, not necessarily promoting the economical growth.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Democratic Peace Theory

    • 3057 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The idea that democracies do not fight each other can be traced back to the writings of Immanuel Kant over two hundred years ago in essay ‘On Perpetual Peace’, however, only in the early 1980s and with the writings of Michael Doyle was the idea consolidated. According to Doyle and other advocates of the democratic peace theory, liberal democratic states have been able to maintain peaceful relations amongst themselves, but are prone to wage war against non-democratic regimes. In order to prove this theory, vast databases have been constructed of historical dyadic relationships between states as well as detailed breakdowns of incidents of inter-state war. The conclusions reached are best shown in the work of Bruce Russett who has argued that alleged wars between democracies (most of which took place in the 19th century) do not meet the criteria for a democracy or for war. These criteria of course are those (conveniently) chosen by Russett. He defines a democracy as a “system of government with a voting franchise for a substantial fraction of citizens” and war is defined by Russett as an “interstate activity with one thousand battle fatalities”. Furthermore, Russett’s data claims to show that since the end of World War II, democratic dyads have not only been able to avoid war, but are less likely to threaten to use force in the settlement of their disputes. So today, the democratic peace theory emerges almost as a truism, democracies don’t fight other democracies, “it is the closest thing we have to empirical law in the study of international relations” says Levy. However, the idea that liberal democracies do not fight other liberal democracies may be a case of false causation. For example we could say ˝fire and the presence of fire engines are closely connected, however we don’t accuse fire engines of causing fire.˝…

    • 3057 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Democratic Peace Theory

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The impression that democratic countries are known to be more peaceful than non- democratic countries have been argued by most theorists, who have brought about the liberal understanding of international politics. This is understood by Immanuel Kant’s edition of democratic peace theory; DPT (Shimko 2009). This composition critically analyses the democratic peace theory that is comprehensively argued by theorists and academics, studied by experts in international relations, and skilfully practised by politicians thus presenting a wide-ranging observation of the theory. Five differing explanations about the peace theory will be mentioned and diverse notions and beliefs will be assessed. This composition will classify whether spreading of the democratic peace theory will guarantee international peace or not, the examples that will be mentioned below of the democratic peace theory will reveal and criticize the true extent of how effective the theory is in reality. The composition simplifies the fundamental theories which establish the disputes between democracy and war. Furthermore, the composition reveals the belief of the democratic peace theory. The composition identifies and reviews angles in which theorists and academics justly believe that the democratic peace theory subsists, and that the origins come about from the qualities of many democracies around the world. Hence, supporters of the democratic peace theory believe that the mutual understanding of peace comes about due to the social norms, culture and political establishment.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Democracy

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Today, most of the countries in the world are democracies. Knowing what is a democracy is really important, especially for those who live in a democracy. It allows you to understand what is the rule that the government plays in the society and know what are your rights and duties under a democratic administration. This essay will seek to define Democracy, the meaning of the word, the system and the history, and describe two of the most famous democracies: Direct democracy and Representative democracy.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Firstly, we must establish the current global state. State sovereignty has undergone many changes in the last decade. New forms of states make up the new international political developments. According to Robinson (2002, p1056) “states have come from the Westphalian system, where control was exclusivist”. This means that no other states could exercise power over another state. Following WWII, a new series of international organisations was created, all with a common view to resolve transnational problems. This also recognised that states may not be as effective on their own.…

    • 2679 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The aim of this essay is to explore in depth not only the concept of democracy as verbalized in popular theory, but also the application of democracy in practice. I shall be: outlining the fundamental definition of what in theory is referred to as a true democracy, drawing several distinctions between different types of democracy, analyzing the practical and theoretical implications of the application of democracy and drawing conclusions based upon my analysis…

    • 3908 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Democratic Peace Theory (DPT) is a modern political theory which became popular among the democratic country to extend and promote their ideology that brings peace and prosperity for the nations. DPT was originated by Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher, in the 1795, and it was scientifically evaluated on 1960s. DPT’s main principle say that, the democratic countries do not go to war against each other, for they have common ambitious hope and dream for the nations toward democracy. DPT says that the democratic countries go to war to prevent future war by converting nondemocratic countries to become democratic. It is said that DPT is the foreign policy of American and western democratic countries toward other non-democratic nations. However it has a great controversial debate on that whether the theory really works or not or right or wrong. The two sides try to prove the theory is right or wrong using the past events; and both have credible proves that support theirs believe. I cannot either agree or disagree that the theory is right or wrong since I believe that it depends on the situation and the meaning of how they define and approach the issues. I personally accept that many democratic countries do not fight each other, but I also think that not all the democratic countries are in peace with each other; which mean even two democratic countries are in conflict sometimes. Though I am totally mutual about the DPT, many countries strongly believe in and apply their foreign policy base on this democratic peace theory.…

    • 2340 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy and human rights are clearly different notions; “they are distinct enough for them to be viewed as discreet and differentiated political concepts.” Whereas democracy aims to empower “the people” collectively, human rights aims to empower individuals. Similarly, human rights is directly associated with the how of ruling, and not just the who, which may be the case in an electoral democracy, though not in a substantive democracy. Thus, “democracies” exist that do not necessarily protect human rights, while some non-democratic states are able to ensure some, though not all, human rights. On another level, the international acceptance, institutionalization, and legal aspects of human rights mentioned above do not apply to democracy.…

    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays