This statement is false. According to the “Infographic EHR vs. Traditional Paper Records” written by Fred Pennic, EHRs have patient history in one easily accessible file. Unlike online medical records, paper based records have limited amount of accessibility due to location and office hours of a medical clinic. (Pennic). In addition, S.A. Livingston’s article “Benefits of Electronic Health Records (EHRs)” also states that 94% of providers report that their online medical records are readily available at point of care at any time. All this information proves just how easy it is to access and use EHRs. For instance, EHRs provide 24/7 access, on-the-go, to the providers or patients with internet access. (Pennic). The best part is, that online medical records are not only easy to access and use, but are also kept safely. “70% report [EHRs] enhances in data confidentially” (Levingston). Electronic health records will always be available, while also being kept …show more content…
Author Fred Pennic in his article “Infographic EHRs vs. Traditional Paper Records” states that most physicians see about 50 to 99 patients a week. For each patient, about 10 to 13 pieces of paper are needed. That about 975 new pages each week just for one physician. (Pennic). Over time 1000s of tons of paper each year. As a result, this causes storage problems and environmental harm. (Pennic). In contrast, online medical records can save all this amount of paper, also saving millions of dollars a year! Thus, paper based records are difficult to place in one entire place. (Pennic). Meaning, papers can be lost, and more paper may be needed. Thankfully, EHRs are developing to our every