Preview

Onewarway Construction Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
978 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Onewarway Construction Case Study
ONEWAY Construction is facing possible action from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency after violating the terms of their beneficial use determination or BUD. “If somebody has a waste product that they’re essentially recycling, they can come in and get a beneficial use determination if they demonstrate that they’ve got a legitimate recycling process going on,” Kyle Rominger, acting manager for the division of land and pollution control at the IEPA, said. “There’s conditions in the BUD, sort of like a permit, on how they need to operate. So (the owner of ONEWAY Construction) was issued one of those. They are currently out of compliance with that.” The company has a large pile of shingles at its Granite City location, which it intends …show more content…
“When we first heard about it, they were accepting some shingles without having a permit or a BUD, and we issued a violation notice to them at that time,” Rominger said. “What they did was they came in and they could have gotten a permit or a BUD, and they chose to get the BUD. I believe they got the BUD and started accepting shingles again, but we found out since then that they are not complying with the BUD.” Tony Lanzone, the owner of ONEWAY Construction, said his company had a violation because of the Illinois Department of Transportation. “It took IDOT a long time to approve my material so that I could sell it,” Lanzone said. “So that’s the only reason I was out of compliance, and I’m actually getting back into compliance. I’ve got contracts for everything that go over and above. So really it’s an allegation at this point.” Willardet first learned of the situation because he received a few calls complaining about nails on the nearby road from loads of shingles being brought to the site. He said ONEWAY Construction is now responsible for sweeping up the road daily to clear it of any nails that may have spilled during transportation of the …show more content…
“Mostly, it’s a nuisance factor,” he said. “If there’s nails on the road, that would be a nuisance. And piles of shingles could have a scenic blight.” Kohler agreed, saying the pile of shingles hurt “the aesthetics of Granite City.” “It still doesn’t help that we’re looking at that back there and the eyesore,” Kohler said. “To me, it looks like a landfill.” At this point, Rominger said the IEPA referred the case to the Illinois Attorney General, the typical protocol for a situation like this. “They are under a referral for enforcement,” Rominger said. “The attorney general may seek a penalty. Ultimately (the goal is) to get them back into compliance and make sure they are complying with the BUD.” Rominger said the next step for the IEPA involves assisting the attorney general. “(The next step) would be working with the attorney general on an enforcement case,” he explained. “So it would be a suite on behalf of the state against ONEWAY Construction.” Lanzone said it was his impression he was now in good standing with the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As an employee of Adair Homes, I would inform my supervisor that the case would first be filed in the county…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On 3/15/16 at 8:18 P.M, while performing a Truck yard audit Shift Supervisor (S/S) Enmanuel Cabrera and Security Officer (S/O) Zachery Smith notice that was an unsecured trailer in the truck yard. The Fed- ex Ground trailer 954205 was located in slip location F127, it was properly secured with bolt seal 035141. Afterward, S/S Cabrera notified Inbound Area Manager Matthew Corrado about the situation at hand.…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Results count of violation of a contract on the bases of 16A Violation, 16C Violation and No Obligation"…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A hearing was called by Judge Sheindlin to discuss ways on how to resolve this issue. One…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 531 Memorandum

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This memo is in response to the dispute over the contract between Span Systems and Citizen-Schwarz AG (C-S). Management is taking the necessary steps in resolving the issues C-S is reporting of low quality deliverables and schedule delays. C-S is threatening rescission of their contract and demand immediate transfer of all unfinished codes (University of Phoenix, 2002, Legal Environment of Business: Contract Creation and Management, Law 531). C-S must prove a material breach is occurring and give adequate notice to Span Systems to issue a rescission (Cheeseman, 2010). Span Systems and C-S signed a one-year contract worth $6 million dollars that has five clauses for breach of contract and a project structure clause. This memo will identify what management is doing to avoid legal risks, minimize liabilities, and benefit from opportunities presented to make this contract successful.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    4. Infection control & OSHA – the lack of not being complaint with the State codes and regulations can cause the project on the on halt due to the safety of contractors’ workers. This would prolong the inspection process until up to city code.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This was a non-operational violation where intentionally and fraudulent Mr. Ira Stanford Williams approved and the return to service several major repairs without having the required authorization by law. Mr. Williams was the possessor of Inspector Authorization privileges until March 31, 2013, that means he knew that he did not have the required authorization. This is an aggravating…

    • 59 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kayser Case Analysis

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Plaintiff Roadway Package System, Inc. (RPS) ships small packages for corporate clients. “Independent linehaul contractors,” such as Defendant Scott Kayser, assist in its operations. RPS terminated Kayser's contract in 1998, alleging that he had failed to fulfill his obligations under the Linehaul Contractor Operating Agreement (LCOA), which governed their association. Kayser exercised his contractual right to demand arbitration and was awarded substantial damages. RPS then brought suit in the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, asking the court to vacate the award. Applying the vacatur standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), the District Court granted the motion on the grounds that the arbitrator exceeded the scope of his authority. We will affirm. (Roadway Package Sys. Inc. v. Kayser, 257 F.3d 287, 300-01 (3d Cir.…

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    TMA01 City Road

    • 721 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The new structure has spilled into the street itself for example a bridge has been added for people to cross during heavy periods when previously the traffic flow had to be manned by police and stopped continually for safety. This is an example of repairing on the street during he times when…

    • 721 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Aviation Law Process

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Outline a brief but complete description of each step in the prosecution and appeal of an FAA certificate action, including FAA procedural steps from Notice to the highest Federal Court; set forth defense alternatives or options and the specific time frames required of both the FAA and the certificate holder defendant during the course of the procedure.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kitchen Best

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Sze awarded the contract to a factory owned by his brother in law, for his personal gain. Knowing that the products were faulty, he hasn’t taken any remedial action or cancel the contract.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Should Pay?

    • 819 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The following case involved Gene Elliot who was employed for Mabey Bridge and Shore. Mabey Bridge and Shore was a small business that rented temporary steel pedestrian bridges to other companies. In this particular case, Mabey Bridge and Shore rented a pedestrian bridge to Turner Construction. Turner Construction decided that it was necessary to use a subcontractor to actually perform the work, and this is where a company by the name of B&C Steel came into play. Apart from renting a bridge, Turner Construction also “rented” the services of Gene Elliot, an employee of Mabey Bridge and Shore, to oversee that B&C Steel performed the work satisfactorily under OSHA standards and general safety procedures for this line of work. I will attempt to explain why I believe Turner Construction is responsible for the injuries that Gene Elliot received while on the job.…

    • 819 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    In 1987, the trustee of a property trust employed CDG Pty Ltd (the first respondent) to design the foundations of a commercial building. The second respondent was a civil engineer employed by the first respondent and was its project manager in relation to the complex’s design and construction.…

    • 2813 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attendees were informed that the Internal Modification Scope works are 100% completed. Variation items are being closed off by Lifetime Roofing. Lifetime Roofing are the only active contractors on the compound.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I was given the opportunity to go to the Wedge Construction site in Charlestown, Nevis. It has been operational for over 30 years. It is a local certified company that specializes in road construction building, construction and water works. There are eight (8) professional that are employed at the company. Out of the twenty-four (24) persons that are employed there the other 18 persons are Apprentices. This company has Masons, Carpenters, Painters etc.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays