Preview

On The Duty Of Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
927 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
On The Duty Of Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis
Henry David Thoreau is one of the most influential individuals with the ideas he expresses through his writing. In “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience,” Henry Thoreau goes into great detail about how our government system isn’t what it needs to be and what he wishes the government would change rather than completely getting rid of the government. Thoreau’s main point in this essay is that we simply need a better government. “...I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government.” (pg. 1017) Thoreau gives many points that he wishes the government would change, and he is right about every single one of them. The government is quite the opposite of what our world needs and there needs to be a change in it eventually. Thoreau’s most important points throughout his essay that relates to today’s situations is an honest man can change the state, the state should respect an individual, and most men act as machines with no moral judgement. One of Thoreau’s most important points in his essay that relates to today’s situations is when he is talking about an honest man changing …show more content…
If the government changed half of what they do now, and followed what Thoreau has said, we would have a better government. Having moral judgment, respecting an individual, or even just standing up for what they believe in may not seem like it’s all that important. However, when you think about figures like Martin Luther King who stood up for his community, or figures like Trump who repetitively makes decisions without any moral sense, it really shows you just how effective those things can be. Our African-American community probably wouldn’t be what it is now without MLK, and our country may not be in as much trouble as it is with Trump’s decisions. The government is the most powerful thing in our country. So as Thoreau says… “...I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    For this week forum 6; I had selected The Struggle for Human Rights by Eleanor Roosevelt, and the purpose for this article or speech is to try to persuade the Member States of the United Nations in the General Assembly to adopt the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), and due to the introduction to the Rogerian method of argumentation that can be useful for solving issues which do not have clear right or wrong sides. This method shows an openness and respect to the other side, shows a lack of bias towards this other side, but still attempts to persuade this other side to believe a specific, albeit less absolute, claim. She develops the central claim using these supporting claims: “this…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe the decision of the people, equality, and freedom of speech are the most vital features of a democracy. The majority of the people’s opinions are expressed through modern democracy and implemented on the society.…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This week, the two men who finished first and second in New Hampshire offered the tale of two Republican parties. John Kasich's speech that night offered the starkest contrast to Donald Trump's triumphant ugliness, scapegoating and division. "We're going to solve the problems in America not by being extreme," he said, but by "reminding…

    • 54 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thoreau clarifies the government is corrupt and unreliable for the people. He uses similes to represent the corruption, and how easy it is for people to take advantage of the government for their own benefit. Thoreau states, "...the work of comparatively a few individuals use the standing government as their tool." Therefore, he is trying to represent the government by a tool that is useful and easy to attain by people. When the government is so easily taken advantage of by few people, it has…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In January 2008, appellant Citizens United, a nonprofit corporation, released a documentary (hereinafter Hillary) critical of then- Senator Hillary Clinton, a candidate for her party’s Presidential nomination. Anticipating that it would make Hillary available on cable television through video-on-demand within 30 days of primary elections, Citizens United produced television ads to run on broadcast and cable television. Concerned about possible civil and criminal penalties for violating §441b, it sought declaratory and injunctive re- lief, arguing that (1) §441b is unconstitutional as applied to Hillary; and (2) BCRA’s disclaimer, disclosure, and reporting requirements, BCRA §§201 and 311, were unconstitutional as applied to Hillary and the ads. The District Court denied Citizens United a prelimi- nary injunction and granted appellee Federal Election Commission (FEC) summary judgment.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emanuel Jal not only tells his stor, but he makes his audience feel as if they are there in the villages with him. Jal gives a brief peek into his story at the beginning of the book. He used this to catch the readers attention and make them want to know every detail of what he went through. Jal says, “In the peaceful village we once knew, rockets blow apart houses with families inside, women are raped, and children are murdered.”(2). Jal’s description of what the war is causing around him pull the reader to read more. As this passage is read the mind begins to imagine everything listed. The mind feels the heat of the explosion, sees shame filled eyes of rape victims, and smells the dead bodies of hundreds. This passage shows a time lapse from…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry David Thoreau, was an unconventional thinker who expressed his ideas about major issues such as war, slavery, wealth, taxes, friendship, vegetarianism, and the lessons that nature can teach. Thoreau was an important transcendentalist writer in the early nineteenth century. During the Mexican American war, Thoreau refused to pay a poll tax and while he was in a protest against slavery, he was arrested. He was thrown into jail for one night and later writes about how the government could be better. I agree that Thoreau’s ideas about how a government should be more better is a excellent postulation and I would further add the government today in the twenty first century still hasn’t even changed at all.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harnoor Chatha Professor Sumstad English-1002-16 October 19, 2014 Rhetorical Analysis Final Draft Deborah Pearlstein author, of Rights in an Insecure World, is the Director of the United States Law and Security Program at Human Rights First. Pearlstein’s purpose is to elaborate and examine different ways our rights are redefined against us after September 11 attack. The Author emphasize her claim about Liberty and Security after September 11 attack on the United States. Author’s intended audience is informing U.S. citizens and criticizing the Government officials (FBI, CIA, and interrogation team at Guantanamo Bay). Author’s main goal is to elaborate and compare how Liberty and Security rights are being violated before and after the September…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thoreau begins his essay by arguing that the government intervenes too much and it would be better if they were not involved at all. He believes men are too absent minded and do whatever the government says without thinking about their morals. Those who listen and follow the government are not wise and do not trust their conscience.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How would you react to people fighting with nonviolence? Would you support them or fight them? After the death of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. one of his supporters, Cesar Chavez wrote about Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s accomplishments in teaching people how to fight with nonviolence. Chavez…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “The Ways of Meeting Oppression,” Martin Luther King Jr. primarily uses ethos to promote the practice of non-violent resistance against the struggle of oppression. In this persuasive piece, King uses ethos to appeal to the African Americans' sense of responsibility. By encouraging them to step up instead of passively accepting injustice, he is implying that he trusts they can do it. His argument is based on moral obligations rather than the practicality of the issue. His use of shared values or ethos such as “religion reminds every man that he is his brother's keeper,” enables the argument to remain in the realm of abstractness, which in turn remove the human tension. That makes it easier for him to change the attitudes of people, making…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Civil Disobedience, Thoreau expresses his strong disapproval of the American government. He even makes the following statement: "the best government is the one that governs the least." This quote shows us that Thoreau really does have a strong dislike for the government and that he will rebel against it. Thoreau does in fact rebel against the government by not paying his taxes. This causes him to suffer one night in jail. In his isolation, he is able to think, and concludes that he would rather be in jail than out in the real world.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading “As a Weapon in The Hands of The Restless Poor” one can feel motivated to help those in need. Earl Shorris appeals to emotion when he talks about creating a program to start to make a difference in the lives of the less fortunate. He starts out the story to say he is writing a book which makes him an author which is an example of ethos because he seems reliable. Shorris then states that the poor have been “Cheated” which is substantially true because the rich were given the opportunity to succeed more as someone who is poor and cannot even afford to feed themselves. In order to help the less fortunate out he has to create a program to help the poor succeed. After a Rhetorical analysis of “As a Weapon in The Hands of The Restless Poor” by Earl Shorris one can conclude that most people take for granted even the little things in life, if one were to open their eyes and see there are many people who do not have a dollar to their name, and we have so much that we tend to lose focus on helping the less fortunate succeed in the world we live in today.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On November 21, 2017 millions of people marched the streets of Washington, D.C., to protest the recently elected President Donald Trump. The protestors were protesting his views on women’s rights, health care, and immigration among other things. People like “members of Congress, world-famous actresses and countless citizens like Joanne Gascoyne of Albany, New York a 78-year-old retired teacher who traveled to New York City with her daughter and two granddaughters” came to protest the rights of women. The Women’s March was caused due to various remarks trump made over his campaign which has instilled fear in many Americans that he will make attacks on women’s rights. The protest didn’t only happen in D.C., but also all over the States and the world. Countries such as Australia, U.K., Japan, France, Germany, Greece,…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Authors have debated the role of governments for hundreds of years. Two of these authors, are Thomas Paine and Henry David Thoreau. "In Common Sense by Thomas Paine, he expresses his opinion on how the government is a "necessary evil", and in the 21st century the government still appears to be evil." Thoreau also expresses his concern with a government in “Civil Disobedience”. Both of these authors had valid opinions, and if they still were alive today they would be outraged with the U.S. Government.…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays