Preview

On Duties: The Morality Of War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1011 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
On Duties: The Morality Of War
War cannot be morally justified, even if it seem necessary or the battle looks to be in your favor. In “On Duties”, he says we have certain duties to those who have wronged us but, by going into a physical altercation with an opponent is the way of the brute. Humans have been on the earth for centuries and have become to civilized to resort to fighting. All throughout history we see many battles being won and lost, for more power or for more money in the winners’ pocket. The costs are far greater than just towns being burned to the ground or societies needing to start over. Soldiers who go to war see more than us who are safely tucked away at home. They lose the very thing that keep us intact, our humanity. To get ahead in war we take any means necessary, it is surprising how quickly someone will throw someone under the proverbial bus to save their own …show more content…
In “Message to Invasion Troops” the general is writing to the soldiers to get them ready for the journey they are about to embark on. He never sugar-coats the fact that the enemy is also prepared for the war and that they will fight savagely. You can only imagine the feel of the room after that letter was read aloud, and how many people were second guessing what they were about to do. Even in “To His Army before His Defeat in Battle” Catiline knew that words can only go so far as to help the soldiers who were about to fight and maybe be killed in the fight ahead. Catiline was killed in this battle, and after his death we don’t know how that effected the soldiers who were under his command. Many could have thought that the war was above their head, this could be seen as cowardice considering they were trying to save their own skin but, if we never had had war in the first place we probably would not have it now and those men would never be put in that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At the beginning of the book private Archie Lemon thinks about the war that suppose to “end injustice,” and that he doesn't mind getting killed, because the people coming after him will live in “happiness and peace” (23). Such a false propaganda is recognized by soldiers fifty pages later. They realize that the war “was brought about moneyed interests for its own selfish ends,” because idealism and patriotism have nothing to do with the war. They call it brutal and degrading, and, “fools who fight, are pawns shoved about to serve the interest of others” (96). March in the 30s recognizes of what the war becomes in the twenty first century; a character name Sergeant Theodore Donohoe back then sees the war as a business (because today it is fought for the territory or land resources); he states that in order to get anywhere in it, one has to adjust oneself to its peculiarities and “play the cards the way they fall” (30). Unfortunately, not a lot of soldiers have learned or will ever learn how to play this game…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    EXPOSITION The justification of war — both in terms of jus in bello and jus ad bellum — is a difficult and complex task. This difficulty is increased immensely when trying to apply just war principles to terrorism, a complicated mix of typical and unconventional tactics that can be performed by both established and state governments. In the essay, I will critically address the discussion of terrorism by Michael Walzer in chapter 12 of “Just and Unjust Wars” (1977) and advocate for the justification of revolutionary terrorism. Walzer’s judgment of terrorism oversimplifies and neglects important complexities that must be considered in the ethical analysis of terrorism.…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A review of chapter 2, 'The Crime of War' in Michael Walzer's book, "Just and Unjust Wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations." Allen Lane 1997.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The word “immoral” is defined by The Cambridge Dictionary as, “Outside [of] society’s standard of acceptable, honest, and moral behavior.” Universal examples of immoral behavior include killing, stealing, lying, cheating, and many more. During the darkest, bloodiest war in the 20th century- World War ll, countless soldiers, prisoners, and common people; fathers, mothers, and children, violated many of these ethics of society. They abandoned and betrayed their family and they stole from stores in times of disaster. These people are not justified in their actions because immorality dehumanizes people and it contributes to the problem.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War brings out the worst in human nature. Soldiers pinned against one another, and for what purpose? Justice, life and freedom? No, all these luxuries can not be afforded by the dead. Those soldiers who have survived this “clash of ideas” , and have been captured by the enemy, have seen a fate worst than death.…

    • 1850 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The decision to go to war has nothing to do with the individuals fighting the war. The warfighters are merely following the orders of the politicians and heads of state who have decided to enter into a war. Walzer claims, “We draw a line between the war itself, for which soldiers are not responsible, and the conduct of the war, for which they are responsible, at least within their own sphere of activity” (39). Soldiers are only responsible for what they directly take part in, so as long as both sides, whether fighting a just or unjust war, follow Jus in Bello principals all soldiers should have the same moral equality. However, Jeff McMahan presents a refutation to this belief in his piece, “Rethinking the ‘Just War’ Part 1”, in which he poses the idea that soldiers are directly responsibility for justice/ injustice of a war. McMahan adheres to a school of thought known as the revisionist approach which believes, “ … that it is the individual…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The next dreadful thing to a battle lost is a battle won,” was once said by Duke of Wellington. Throughout history, many wars have occurred and have cause much change in the world. In the essay The Moral Equivalent of War, by William James, the same topic about war is discussed within the essay. However, William James, the author, seems like he does not approve the reasons and actions for many of the wars that have occurred. Furthermore, William seems to try to find reason and try to understand many points of view to go war. I would believe that William James would disagree with the quote because, even though he is a pacifist, he seems to try to find the reason behind going to war and knows that with winning a war, it continues to nourish a couple of human virtues.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Virtue and Army Values

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages

    negative views on the issue. Another army value which is next is respect. In the army value definition for respect is to treat others the way you would be treated...…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    J. Hunter Koch Andrea Gillespie English II 11 March 2015 The Truthful and Dreadful Realities of War Does the topic "war" truly generate images of honor and fame? In most wars a winner who achieves his goal and a loser who fails his intended goal always exist. Yet, numerous people in battles generally lose extremely integral elements of life including their own physical lives, relationships with the home front, and future corporal and mental health capabilities. In fact, the Union Army won the Civil War and still suffered more casualties than the Confederate Army (Levy 86).…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Combat High

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    War is brutal, imagine young men far away from the comforts of western modern life as we know it, no running water, no communications with the external world nor any kind of entertainment, wanting of close relationships such as close friends, girlfriend/boyfriend/spouse, parents, that make us who we are as individuals. Situated in a strange place full of people wanting to hurt them. In spite of all lacking somebody has to carry the war burden, somebody has to stand up for all the things we enjoy as a society, someone has to fight for our freedom, and there they are.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the conflict uses conventional warfare, it is not categorized as just war because it does not fit into all of the five categories that define when war is just. First of all, it is a preventive war rather than a last resort or preemptive war. Second, it also is not a last resort and does not have a just cause.…

    • 61 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just War Theory

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When is war acceptable? That is the question that the Just War theory (jus bellum iustum) attempts to answer. Guided by an evolving set of criteria, this tradition attempts to provide a framework by which the both the reasons for a war and the combatants' behavior may be judged to be ethical and morally justifiable. This theory or doctrine, has roots in both philosophical and historical contexts, having been shaped by conventions and rules observed through ages of war as well as the thoughts of philosophers of those same ages. These principles are divided into two parts: 'the right to go to war' (jus ad bellum), which concerns itself with whether it is justifiable…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although we need to fight in wars to keep our country free and for the common good of the world, war has lasting effects on the brave “boys” that serve in them.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    War is never an easy discussion; it is a subject people constantly debate, especially in regards to total war. Questioning the morality of total war is an issue due to the elasticity of the definition, which is dependent upon the individual. General William T. Sherman’s total war strategy in Georgia and the Carolinas is arguably morally acceptable -even though it included waging war against the civilian population- when taking into account the benefits versus the costs. There were excessive actions taken by Sherman’s soldiers, which stemmed from their prejudices towards the southern population. However, as a result of Sherman’s plan the war ended in a swift victory for the North. The justification and by association the morality of total war…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Accountability is very important because it allows for your chain of command to know where you are at the moment, It is also important because it tells the unit commanders allso the none comisiond officers how around how many personnel are available to perform certain tasks,If a leader does not know around how many troops are available then he/she will not know who is available to do what,Everything must be accounted for, from food, rounds, troops, vehicles, fuel, and so on.disciplin and acountablity to your unit is a must,so they know where you are and that you are safe and the military is run off disciplin with out it we wouldnt be the greatest military/army in the history of the world.103…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays