Preview

Oedipus The King: When The Connections Are Made

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1447 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Oedipus The King: When The Connections Are Made
The Tragedy of Oedipus: When the Connections Are Made
The Revelation is the Tragedy

Oedipus the King, a Greek play written by Sophocles, tells the tragic life story of King Oedipus. What make the play tragic is not the literal series of events that occurred, but the story and the narration behind the events. Several elements contribute to the difference between Oedipus's own autobiographical accounts and what others know of him. It is only when that gap is closed that the reality of the situation is revealed.
However, Oedipus is a protagonist who encounters many obstacles during his search for the truth. One of them is that he cannot step back and see himself from an outside perspective. The other is the fact that he has no memory of his
…show more content…
/ Do you know who your parents are?" (Sophocles 28) Here sight is being associated with knowledge hence Oedipus's limited sight equals limited knowledge. Oedipus might be able to literally see the present, but it is Teiresias who, perhaps in exchange for his current lack of sight, can see beyond the present.
Teiresias is the one who is able to foretell the past and the future, for example, "A deadly footed, double striking curse / from father and mother both, shall drive you forth / out of this land, with darkness in your eyes…(28)" What Oedipus believes about the past, or the story that he has told himself about himself, consists solely of what he remembers. Thus one can say that there is a strong link between how he perceives the present and what he recalls from the past.
This is where the fault of memory enters the equation. It is impossible for Oedipus to remember the details of every event in his life; such that he can recall immediately recall any memory. Therefore, it is only understandable that he fails to make certain connections such as the murder of a king and his killing a stranger on the road. However, later as Oedipus comes to a realization he

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Oedipus Rough Draft

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Being ignorant of the world around oneself is worse than being blind. The truth is hard to observe if one is not thinking critically and be open minded. When one is self absorbed in his own hubris, he will lose track of values that are much more important to him, including his own prophesized fate. In Oedipus Rex, Oedipus’s “blindness” towards the decisions he made and his past added to his inevitable downfall.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play Oedipus Rex by Sophocles, the themes of sight and blindness are developed in a way to communicate to the reader that it is not eyesight itself, but insight that holds the key to truth and, without it, no amount of knowledge can help uncover that truth. Some may define insight as the ability to intuitively know what is going to happen, or simply as the capacity to understand the true nature of a situation. Both definitions hold a significant role in the play, not only for more obvious characters such as Oedipus and Teiresias, but also for Iocaste, whose true character is rather questionable considering her reactions to the events of the play, however, one can only speculate. With these themes in mind, one can see how Sophocles portrays each character to suit these themes and communicate his own definition of the term "sight."…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A tragic hero is defined as “a [great] man who is neither a paragon of virtue and justice nor undergoes the change to misfortune through any real badness or wickedness but because of some mistake” (“Aristotle”, n.d.). Therefore, a tragic hero has some sort of tragedy that surrounds their life. A tragic hero also makes dramas more interesting and makes readers think. Dramas sometimes either exemplify or refute Aristotle’s definition of a tragic hero. Oedipus by Sophocles exemplifies Aristotle’s definition in four different aspects. The first aspect involves both Oedipus’ ignorance and knowledge of his life situations, the second involves his hamartia, the third involves the actual plot itself, and the fourth involves the characterization of…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It seems as if only the gods could be blamed for the tragic ending of Sophocles’ Oedipus the King. How could one not blame them, for they placed a prophecy on the king, his wife and their son, sending them to their dreadful doom. Perhaps there is more to be seen in this famous Greek tragedy. Perhaps the blame does not belong completely to the gods, but to the victims of the prophecy. Sophocles exemplifies this throughout the play using methods of symbolism, actions and words.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A person of noble birth with heroic or potentially heroic qualities, defines a tragic hero. A young man known by the name Oedipus, died a tragic hero. Throughout his life, he was faced with situations that he just could not surpass which led to his gruesome destiny. He was born into a world where the future held nothing but lies and despair.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oedipus the King Paper

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1) What were your initial thoughts about the character of Oedipus? My own initial thought about Oedipus is that he is very nice towards his “parents” because he thinks he will be saving his family and not killing his father. Then when he kills the king I was wondering why he would start a fight to the death when they could have just solved it peacefully. Then I thought he was very stuck up and spoiled because he became king for getting rid of the Sphinx and was very stubborn to his brother-in-law (uncle). Then I thought that he needs to stop talking and listen to his own thoughts and think everything threw.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oedipus The King Analysis

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Any great story has its critics ready to critique every great detail of a story. Sophocles’s Oedipus the King is no exemption. Oedipus the King was written around 430 B.C. so this play has had plenty of time to be critiqued. Not only has this Greek tragedy been around for so long, but it is considered a masterpiece; it only makes sense for something very famous to be criticized even more.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main concentration of Oedipus was preventing his downfall in the story, but due to his inner blindness and the rest of his character flaws he was unsuccessful in this journey, which is the reason that Oedipus was a static character throughout the whole story. He has various flaws, which always started multiple conflicts in the story, all of which gradually directed him to his downfall in the plot of the play. All of the shortcomings of Oedipus are the reason for his quick, horrific downfall from his kingliness into poor, ever-wandering blind man he has become by the conclusion of the story.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Blindness In Oedipus Rex

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Since he blinds himself after he learns the truth, he transitions to becoming physically blind but spiritually aware. Earlier in the novel, he has tunnel vision for he must know the truth to maintain his leadership and feed his hubris for being the great king that solves the city’s problems. He refers to himself as, “I, Oedipus, who bear the famous name” (4), and refers to his subjects as “my children” (9). Oedipus elevates himself to a god-like standing, as even a priest comes to seek help from. The dynamics in this situation reveal that he places himself above everyone, which ultimately leads to his downfall. However, Oedipus is elevated in a more transcendental way at the end of the novel as he takes in genuine concern for his children and Thebes as opposed to the self-absorbed Oedipus seen throughout the course of the novel. No longer is the focus on his power and whether he is the plague of Thebes or not, but he takes action for his people. He exiles himself by saying, “Let me purge my father’s Thebes of the pollution” (77), marking his heroism and maintaining his promise that he would rid Thebes of plague at any cost. He shows concern for his family by saying, “Take care of [my daughter], Creon; do this for me” (77). By pleading for pity upon his children and ensuring that they’re protected after he leaves, he shows a gain in empathy and consciousness uncharacteristic of him in earlier scenes. His transition from self-inflation to self-actualization shows the meditation that is achieved through blindness. Oedipus Rex leaves off with the note “let none presume on his good fortune until he find life, at his death, a memory without pain” (81). This final quote suggests good fortune cannot be determined until one can reflect on life without regrets or pain. Although Oedipus faces decline in…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    15. What superiority does Oedipus claim over Teiresias? Note the frequent equation of physical sight with knowledge throughout this scene and the rest of the play. What is the irony of this equation? Teiresias then tells Oedipus the horrible truth about himself.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each person will play a role in your life which could lead to a positive or a negative impact on your life. Oedipus Rex was written around 429 BCE by Sophocles and is the second play of the trilogy, The Three Theban Plays. This play consists of a prologue, parados as well as an exados and four acts and odes. The setting of the play takes place mostly in Thebes with side notes about previous pasts in other areas, like Corinth. Oedipus is the main character, who, in his best, tries to help the city of Thebes and reveal the killer of the King. As the play progresses, he begins to realize that he is the man whom he seeks as the murder of the King, which is known to be his ultimate downfall. There are several different characters that influence Oedipus’s life as well as how he changes and who he becomes as the play…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is understandable that he did not do a full background check on himself when he started to put the pieces together but if he would have just caught on a little sooner then maybe he could have tried to put the blame on someone else so that he could continue to be king or leave the city before anyone else noticed, none of this would have happened. He damned the person that killed Laios, essentially damning himself. He married the woman that gave birth to him and had children with her, ruining his life along with his children’s, and ultimately resulting in the death of Iocaste. If he knew himself and who he truly was, he would have never married his mother or damned the person that killed the king. Oedipus chose to believe that he was not the person that killed the king even after all the signs pointed to him. If he would have just stopped and looked at the bigger picture, then he would have realized that everything he did and everything leading up until that point showed who he truly…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Truth In Oedipus The King

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Once the truth is uncovered that Oedipus is in fact the murder of his father and married to his mother, his mother kills herself. In seeing this, Oedipus makes the decision to blind himself physically in order to not have to see the results of his sins. "A brothers hands which turned your father's eyes, those bright eyes you knew once, to what you see, a father seeing nothing, knowing nothing, be getting you from his our source of life" (1670- 16730). Oedipus' words are to his daughters once he has blinded himself and wished to be banished. Oedipus himself points out that in fact he is their brother and father. Also that in that realization he blinded himself with his hands in order to "see nothing" and "know nothing". In having the metaphoric blindness removed from Oedipus in him knowing the truth, he physically takes it upon himself to put the blindness back by stabbing his eyes. Oedipus believes that if he is incapable of seeing anything, then in fact that truth which he knows to be true does not exist. The idea that the truth is too overwhelming for him to handle, "to this guilt I bore witness against myself with what eyes shall I look upon my people" (1560). Therefore, not having eyes makes it impossible for him to witness the reactions of the people he governs, once they know the truth. Keeping himself ignorant not only to what he has done, but to…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oedipus was shaded to the truth of his own life. Oedipus didn’t have any idea that his parents were who they turned out to be, Laius and Jocasta. He was oblivious to everything so much that when he did finally hear the truth, he would get angry at anyone who proposed the facts to him. As the story progressed, Oedipus was unprotected from the truth. He realized he was the person causing horrible periods in Thebes. He also recognized that he killed his own dad and married his mom.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Persevering in his urge to find the truth about his origins, pushing his actions beyond the limits and against anybody’s dissimilar advice, he overcame all in discovering his identity, discovering himself, but the seeming success is followed by an overwhelming action of self-mutilation. Prophesy becomes truth: he is his father’s murderer and his mother’s husband. Physical blindness keeps Oedipus from having to see the looks of other people’s faces who know the truth about him. He felt just to hurt himself for unknowingly being with his mother and killing his father and punishing himself for the terrible thinks he did. ”For why should I have sight, To whom nought now gave pleasure through the eye?” “What could I see, whom hear With gladness, whom delight in anymore?”(1). He cannot bear to see the consequences of being a criminal and immoralist, albeit unknowingly or to look in the eyes the father he kills or the mother he married when they all meet again in death.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays