Preview

Oedipus

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
973 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Oedipus
Human Nature: Fate vs. Free Will

For centuries, it has been human nature to strive for freedom. We struggle to create our own futures, regardless of our presumed fate. Songwriters, artists and even play writes constantly include stories of free will and destiny. Sophocles, a famous Greek playwright, beautifully includes fate and free will as themes in his plays Oedipus the King and Oedipus at Colonus. This motif is so abundant in Greek literature because oftentimes characters try to avoid an oracle that they don’t want to accept to be true; this opens up an opportunity for human nature to fight fate, which is what Sophocles sets the basis for his plays. Although each character’s fate is chosen for them, they try to fight their destiny because they want a brighter future.
In Oedipus the King, there are two major oracles that cause Oedipus to fight for a different fate. The oracle declared, ”…doom would strike him down at the hands of a son, our son, to be born of our own flesh and blood” (Sophocles, Oed 786-788) this is in reference to his father, and also that Oedipus was, “ fated to couple with your mother, you will bring a breed of children into the light no man can bear to see- you will kill your father, the one who gave you life” (Sophocles, Oed 873-875). These two events happen very quickly in the play and from then on he tries to fight his fate. As he struggles, his destiny is becoming more of a reality without him knowing. This makes Oedipus a tragic character, because he purposefully tries to make only good, but ends up killing his father, and marrying his own mother. One could argue that if Oedipus never heard the fate from the oracle, he wouldn’t have tried to avoid it the way he did, and could have possibly changed his own destiny. This makes the oracle that Oedipus received a self fulfilling prophesy, meaning that the existence of the fate created such a distaste in the mind of Oedipus that it consumed him and made it a reality.
Oedipus is a man



Cited: Sophocles. The Three Theban Plays. New York: Robert Fagles, 1982. Print. Sutton, Brian. “Sophocles’s Oedipus the King and Spielberg’s Minority Report.” Galenet. Heldref Publications, Summer 2005. Web. 21 Dec. 2010. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Oedipus Rex

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Everyone makes mistakes and has flaws – not even famous celebrities are perfect. With all of the social networking, growth of the internet, and all other media sources, these mistakes by the people we adore are blown out of proportion and shared with the world. In the Ancient Greek Tragic play Oedipus Rex by Sophocles, the reader learns about the tragic flaw and downfall of Oedipus. While reading, he/she begins to think about all of the celebrities that have also had a flaw which led to a major downfall. Tiger Woods and Oedipus are very similar in that they were both on top of the world but each had tragic flaws which lead to their downfall and exile from the world that they ruled.…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Sophocles’ O edipus The King, Oedipus was born with the curse that he would kill his father, Laios, and marry his mother, Jocasta. Oedipus tries to avoid his fate by running away from Corinth, however this causes him and Laios to meet one last time, and Oedipus ends up fulfilling the prophecy. With this in mind, the gods create a person’s predetermined fate, and no one can ever escape it, as Jocasta points out; “No mortal can practise the art of prophecy, no man can see the future.” (935). O edipus The King i llustrates t hat the gods have the ultimate power in people's’ lives rather than free will of the people, an individual cannot overcome fate because the gods determine their future, and personalities are chosen by the gods and as well…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    From the very beginning of Oedipus, it is made clear "that his destiny be one of fate and worse". The irony is that Oedipus unknowingly repeatedly predicts his own fate: "It was I who called down these curses on that man." Oedipus has unconsciously married his mother and killed his father, just as the Oracle predicted. Fate is proven to be unavoidable to Oedipus as the play shows a devout belief in the Greek gods. The Gods are seen as both "protectors" and "punishers", who can "turn fate back away". The gods are shown to have power over everything and everyone, and whoever ignores them will be cursed by the "darts no one escapes". Oedipus is one of these people who is seen to have ignored the gods' warnings and therefore has brought a curse upon himself, and all those around him: "Nothing grows in the earth, nothing in the wombs of the women." With the idea of fate comes the question of fairness. Does Oedipus deserve his pitiful destiny and if it was so pre-decided then why? It was yet again the God's powers.…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free will is something that has always been questioned from the beginning of time. Do we really have the option of free will, or are we all destined to fate? The ancient Greeks believed in fate and that the gods had complete control over our lives. That concept is also believed in modern day society; Christianity believes that God has a plan for us and that our futures are already preordained. We see throughout the play that Oedipus’s life was prophesied from the beginning and as much as he tries to avoid it fate always seems to find him.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oedipus the king

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Oedipus the King” was a tale depicting the human experience; each human has a great victory, shortly accompanied by a great demise; the rollercoaster of life. Oedipus had his great success soon become the reason for his fall. With Oedipus’ deadly flaw being ‘hubris’; his excessive pride led him to believe he was on the level of ‘gods’. Once he paraded that he was invulnerable (untouchable by even the gods), his fall would be all the more tragic. Throughout the tale however, Oedipus uses many rhetorical devices towards all his subjects without even recognizing.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oedipus the King

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When Oedipus is completely blind to the truth, he is safe from fulfilling his terrible destiny. It is when he begins to see the truth that he starts to approach his fate. "...a drunken man maundering in his cups / Cries out that I am not my father's son! / ...the suspicion / Remained always aching in my mind," Here, on page 42, Oedipus, in a very minor way, starts to see the truth. By becoming slightly aware of the truth, Oedipus's situation only got worse as his knowledge only escalated with every curious inquiry. Because of what the drunkard said, Oedipus learned about the oracle ("[Oedipus] should lie with [his] own mother... / ...and that he should be his father's murderer" (42) ) and fled for safety from what he thought was his fate. However, he was doing the exact opposite; while fleeing from Corinth, he met his real father, King Laїos, and killed him. He then made his way to Thebes where he married his real mother, Iocaste.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oedipus the King is a story of individuals who try to escape fate but fail. In the play, the prophecy is revealed first to King Laius and later to Oedipus. Oedipus is destined to murder his father and marry his mother. King Laius and Oedipus did everything in their power to avoid the tragedy. However, their actions actually lead them closer to the realization of the prophecy. The characters have their own free will because of the choices they made in the story. Ironically, the choices created a chain of events that ultimately lead to the tragedy that had been predestined by the Gods. Furthermore, knowing a future that will negatively affect our live actually will cause us to try to defy our fate and blind ourselves from the circumstances that are happening.…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When heroes that are tied to destiny feature in literature, they often show signs of arrogance. In Oedipus the King, Sophocles shows how Oedipus’s quest for avoiding his destiny drives him to fulfill without being fully aware of it. When running away he finds himself married to his mother and becoming the king of Thebes. In contrast, in Shakespeare’s Hamlet the main character is visited by the former king and informs him of the new kings doings. As a result the main character is convinced and must seek vengeance for the former king. While there is a fairly large time gap between these two pieces of literature, both explore how the arrogance of one can lead to a tragic outcome and how both Hamlet and Oedipus are tragic heroes. However, whereas Sophocles illustrates the destructive effects of attempting to avoid fate, Shakespeare demonstrates how vengeance can lead to one's self destruction.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oedipus and the Gods

    • 2206 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The idea of fate has existed for a long time and exists even today. Fate revolves around the idea that people 's lives are predetermined and that no matter what is done it cannot be changed. With the gods it was used to explain events that seemed strange. Sophocles expands on this idea by introducing Oedipus ' fate. The thought of fate is strong considering no matter how hard he struggles he still receives what was predetermined. As a baby he survived the elements on Mount Cithaeron. As Oedipus was destined to live, it shows the dominance of fate. Having fate play such a large part of the play is certainly an insight into the Greek 's idea that fate controls us no matter how hard we struggle against it.…

    • 2206 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    oedipus

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Oedipus the King is Western Literature’s first detective story and a horrifying tale of one man’s world turn upside down. An oracle came to Laius one fine day and it said that doom would strike him down at the hands of a son, our son, to be born of our own flesh and blood. (Lawall, 631) Once knowing this, Laius and Jacosta gave orders to a shepherd to leave the baby in a field to die. The King and Queen of Corinth, Polybus and Dorian adopted the child and named him Oedipus. This could be an example of free will and also fate. It was the shepherd’s free will to give the baby in good hands instead of leaving it to die. Although, leaving him alive was only playing into the role of the prophecy. How would the story be if Laius and Jacosta actually kept their child, would the oracle have come true? When Oedipus received the rumors he went to the Delphic oracle to find any truth on the rumors. This could also be considered an example because his own free will took him to see the oracle and also he promised himself not to ever set foot in Corinth, which is another example of free will. As he headed to the Delphi oracle, Apollo flashed before Oedipus eyes and told him “You are fated to couple with…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oedipus Rex

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Oral Presentation gave me a clear idea about how and what the author was trying to convey through his book. Not being from the time period at which the play was written made it difficult to interpret what Sophocles was trying to portray. Even though the presentation clarified most of my questions, I was still left pondering certain aspects of Oedipus Rex.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oedipus the King

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Unity of Action: Each of the incidents in this play is part of a tightly constructed cause-and-effect chain. The plague in Thebes prompts Oedipus to send Creon to consult the oracle of Delphi; the oracle¡¦s reply that the murderer of Laius must be banished from Thebes prompts Oedipus pronounce a solemn curse on the murderer and to send for Teiresias. Teriesias states that Oedipus is the murderer, but since the king knows himself to be innocent (or thinks he knows), he accuses Creon of plotting with Teiresias against him. The quarrel of Oedipus and Creon brings Jocasta from the house; seeking to calm down her husband and prove that oracles cannot be trusted, she tells again of how Laius died. When she mentions that he was killed ¡§at a place where three roads meet,¡¨ Oedipus suddenly begins to suspect that he may indeed have killed the king without knowing who he was. To settle the matter, they send for the Herdsman who is the only survivor of that attack. Meanwhile a messenger arrives from Corinth to inform Oedipus that his supposed father, King Polybus of Corinth, has died. When Oedipus rejoices that he did not kill his father as the oracle had prophesied but is still worried that he may marry his mother, the Messenger, seeking to relieve him of this fear, innocently tells him that Polybus and Merope were not his real parents.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fate vs Free Will

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I believe that the people who lived in Ancient Greek felt that their lives were controlled by the gods. They believed everything that they hear the gods say will come true. People can be as free as the gods who influence them. If the gods are free, then people are also free. Jocasta and Laius were perfect examples of freewill. It was their choices that led them to their terrible destinies. Their actions showed that it was freewill that created their destiny. As Oedipus ' parents believed their fate, they tried every free will they had to stop their fate from happening. Since they believed fate defines something that will happen, they felt like the only way stop their fate from happening is to send Oedipus to get killed. If Oracles would have never told King Laius about the prophecy of Oedipus killing him he wouldn’t have sent his servant to kill him and Oedipus would have known who his real parents were and would of never killed his father or slept with his mother. After Jocasta discovered she married and had children with her son, she made the choice to kill herself. No one forced her to do it; it was her choice. Only someone is safe from their fate when they are either completely aware of it, or completely blind of it. When Oedipus learns his fate of killing his father, he immediately tries to prevent it and ran away from who he thought was his parents. He freaked out and…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oedipus

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fate is the develpment of events outside a person's control, regarded as determined by a supernatural power. In Oedipus's fight against fate, he expierenced all aspects an Aristostlian Tragic Hero, but above all suffering and discovery. Therefore, Oedipus is far more tragic than Antigone and Creon; for his suffering exceeds greatly beyond theirs, as does his discovery.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    oedipus the king

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Aristotelian philosophy teaches that knowing material reality can be achieved by properly identifying the essential traits of things and distinguishing things from other things by forming classification schemes based on those traits. The theory's great power is that it canproduce useful, independently verifiable categories of analysis--if we all can agree on the epic's essential traits, then we can conduct reasonable scholarly discussions about epics. Since Aristotle also was interested (like his teacher, Plato) in the proper organization of human communities, from the one-family "oikos" (whence "economy") to the city-state of the "polis," he also tried to describe the social functions of literature. This continues to be an important line of study in modern literary theory. One of the method's weakness arises from disagreements about what, if anything, can be called essential from the start ("a priori"), outside some kind of social, political, historical processes that made it. A second weakness, shared by some practitioners of Structuralism (q.v.), is Aristotle's fondness for defnition and categorizatino by "binary oppositions": states which are supposed to be mutually exclusive (i.e., "live or dead," "on or off," in that you can't be both, but must be one or the other). Many of the oppositions by which he constructed his literary analysis are suspect or simply wrong, at least in our own era (e.g., "comedy or tragedy" has become confused with tragi-comedy and satire). Post-Aristotelian thinking tends to avoid relying upon unexamined binary oppositions and to look backwards, in order to situate literature's traits in the processes which created them, but otherwise we owe a great methodological debt to "The Philosopher," as he was known to medieval readers.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays