Preview

Obstacles to Ethics

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
455 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Obstacles to Ethics
Obstacle to Ethics: Determinism

DETERMINISM: Our choices and actions are the result of pre-existing conditions. We do not have free will or the capacity to choose between alternatives. We are not responsible for our actions, cannot be blamed or praised for them, because we cannot act "against" or contrary to the forces or pre-existing conditions that compel us (psychological, social, economic, environmental, genetic). Since we could not have done otherwise, it is pointless to grant rewards or impose punishments.
SCIENTIFIC DETERMINISM: The notion that every event in nature, including human choice and action, is the result of and can be explained in terms of antecedent or pre-existing causes or conditions. Scientific determinism includes both:
- ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, or forces outside of individual persons, such as climate (hot or cold, rainy or dry, etc.), culture (custom and language), history, and technology AND
- PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS, inner forces or conditions operating within the person's own "psyche" (unconscious or subconscious drives - Freud), behavior ("operant conditioning" or behaviorism - Skinner), or genes.
FREE WILL: This is the human capacity to think or imagine alternatives and choose between them without compulsion from inner psychological forces or outer natural, social, and economic factors. Free will is the capacity to act on our own and "against“conditions. Free will should be distinguished from FREEDOM, which is simply the absence of things getting in the way of what we are compelled to want and do. The prisoner loses his "physical freedom" when he or she is imprisoned.
LIBERTARIANISM: This is the view that our choices are free, and that we can control our lives. It maintains that, although people do not always control their lives, they are at least capable of doing so. We are responsible for our actions, because we could have chosen or acted otherwise. According to this view, we are AUTONOMOUS; that is, we are self-ruling or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Importance of Ethics

    • 3331 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Aristotle was one of the first and perhaps most influential of all people to shape the ethics of Western civilization from a secular orientation. He believed that every type of animal has a common essence or nature, and that human beings are essentially, or by nature, rational. He viewed rationality as the central and most significant trait distinguishing humankind from other creatures. Further, Aristotle taught that the good person is the one who lives most rationally and whose moral judgments and social conduct are born of contemplation and reason, in contrast to spontaneity and emotionality. Today, when we address a moral dilemma by saying, "Let us use reason; let us use logic; let us think rationally about this," we are being ethical in the Aristotelian, secular tradition.[i]…

    • 3331 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinism is a controversial topic to free will with multiple theories proving and disproving it. As printed in The Collins Cobuild Learner's Dictionary, determinism is defined as “...the belief that all actions and events result from other actions, events, or situations, so people cannot in fact choose what to do.” Meaning, all life choices are predetermined from the minute we are born, to the minute we die. In contrast, “freewill is an individual taking control and responsibility for his/her actions according to his personal will” (Freewill Verses Determinism). People who believe in Free will, accept the idea that life is not predetermined, and they can independently act however they see fit. Free will and determinism can be further simplified and have multiple differences as well as similarities.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that free will is true in saying, the idea that humans can freely choose their actions rather than all our lives being predetermined like the way determinist believe. Determinist think free will is just simply an illusion, and that our thoughts come from our background, and we are unaware as to which we strive no conscious control. As Sam Harris philosopher, claims that our thoughts and desires impose instinctive circumstances that define the character of your consciousness in that moment.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical Dilemmas

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Mayor of a large city was given a free membership in an exclusive golf club by people who have received several city contracts. He also accepted gifts from organizations that have not done business with the City but might in the future. The gifts ranged from $200 tickets to professional sports events to designer watches and jewelry.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Free will, by definition, is having the ability or power to act without regard to limitations and at the individuals own discretion.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Well, breaking it down that is not what free will defines. Free will is the ability to make his or her own decision. To some extent determinism (not to be confused with hard determinism) and free will can both collaborate together making our world. Yes, something had to create us, but when we are born we are born with a desire to follow our hearts. We are designed to have our own free will. Although it may seem like hard determinism derails free will's argument it is an incorrect accusation at a completely different topic not in relation to free will. If we used hard determinism, that would mean that no one is held accountable to their actions or morals. With their philosophy it would mean that everything was planned out and whatever happens was planned to happen. So with that in mind it does not matter if I steal because it was supposed to happen, etc. I believe God gave us free will to further the Kingdom of God, and because He wants us to choose Him, not be forced to love…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHL 458 Week 1

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Free will is the power to make choices freely without any constraints or compulsions. Free will is a voluntary decision and an independent choice. It is the “capacity to respond in ways that oppose even the strongest influences” (Ruggiero, 2009). People possess free will. This is the reason why people’s decisions are unpredictable. Free will helps a person form thoughts. No matter the pressure or force placed on a person, the person will act on his or her own free will when making decisions.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phl458 Week 1

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    "Free will is the capacity to respond in ways that oppose even the strongest influences. Free will is itself a causative factor, and one that can trump all others" (Ruggiero, 2019, p. 37). We all have a choice in any situation, although one's ethics or morals can influence choices, nevertheless the choice to react in one way or another is one's free will.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Libertarians support the view that people have free will and so we are free to make moral decisions. For a Libertarian, the key evidence for this is the act of decision making in our daily lives. Hume states that “experience is what we see to be true”, each human being experiences the feeling of being free to make a decision. If experiencing any other action constitutes it to be true, then why not the same for free will? Libertarians argue that we have awareness of the choices we make; we can choose to do anything that we are capable of. Though we are influenced by our environment and experiences, ultimately we can make our own decisions, nothing is inevitable or determined. Libertarians hold the belief of a moral self; humans want to want to do things. For example, a smoker may think it would be a good idea to give up smoking, but their addiction is too strong for them to think it possible or in any way likely; they want to want to give up smoking. Humans are unique in this way and it is this which is called the moral self. Libertarians are dualists believing that the human mind is separate from the physical world. It is because of this that our reason and autonomy, our moral self, can transcend over other causal determinants. Kant argues that by applying reason to decisions we can escape any authority from cause and effect or desires and emotions, we are the agents of our own decisions. Libertarians believe in a forking path of choices rather than the straight road of determinism.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Changes in behaviuor are the result of an individual's response to events that occur in the environment.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethical Dilemmas

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages

    PASSION: Why am I here? As a child I was always attracted to the smaller, weakened animal I found in my yard, i.e. dying birds, kittens, bugs, etc. The animals we owned were never neutered which resulted in a numerous amount of puppies and kittens. I was intrigued by the cycle of life. Originally I wanted to become a veterinarian. The financial strain on my family made it apparent that it would not be possible. As fate would have it, there was a two year waiting list for nursing school, but I was readily accepted into a two year respiratory program. At the end of the respiratory program, I stayed for one more year to specialize in NICU.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to "Merriam-Webster" (2014), “Free will is the ability to choose how to act or the ability to make choices that are not controlled by fate or God.” We use free will to make decisions not determined by religion or government but solely based on our minds. Freewill capacity is exclusive to each that permits them to control their actions.…

    • 573 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The complete opposite of Libertarianism is Fatalism. Fatalism is also known as hard determinism. It states that free will is completely impossible and that physical determinism is true. By that being said, it means that no one is free and everything that one does was determined to be done before they did it. Evidence that backs up fatalism is the fact that there have been tests in which shows that the brain makes decisions for us before we consciously do. The seven second test shows that when asking a person to randomly raise either the left arm or right arm, the researcher could predict seven seconds before which hand the subject was going to raise before they even knew. This test provides critical information that the brain has already…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Libertarianism

    • 541 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Libertarianism has always been an approach of letting people live the way the want as long as they do not harm others. In a sense it is a way to give free and full control of ones life to themselves without much government interference. If property was gained fairly, that property cannot be taken away by anyone; including government. It is a means of also setting up a free-market within the system and helping to create free and full competition.…

    • 541 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    applying ethics

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This brief synopsis as a human service worker in which I make every effort to help people, groups, and communities to triumph over their issues and struggles. As a human service worker I almost certainly would come across many ethical predicaments that involve susceptible issues such as discrimination, social unfairness, and oppression, poverty, substance abuse and mental health issues. As a human service worker or provider my personal principles may become an ethical difficulty with reference to discrimination of any sort because of my private belief but of course I am conscious of how many ethical standards that can be challenged if I allow my individual view to develop into concern. Nevertheless of course I identify with knowing and should no bet use as an unbiased conclusion unless the circumstances turn out to be dangerous to myself or the client involved. Next, if this circumstance come to pass then I would use the code of moral principles produced by the national association of human service workers as a most important point addressing ethical predicament which it may cause. On the other hand, I was in a circumstance where a person that I was helping he was very serious and clear in his mind and full detail about who he wanted to work with and talk too. He was discriminating against a co worker because of skin color and race although we were on the job and others was watching him he decided to be rude and very sarcastic for no apparent reason. I wanted to voice my opinion but I didn’t but finally one day I decided to read the code of ethics at work and fill out a report on him with other co workers so that the discrimination could stop. It ended up being better than before the man was disciplined but functioning in the human service department there will be times when you do not agree with your client and your own principles could turn…

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays