Preview

Objectivity and Subjectivity in Science

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
558 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Objectivity and Subjectivity in Science
Galon, Edel Angelo S.
Integrative Essay 2

Science as both Objective and Subjective in Nature Objectivity refers to the property of science that deals with the scientific measurement that is tested independently from the one who proposed it. In other words objectivity aims reproduce a certain experiment in order for it to be tested and demonstrated by other parties. Objectivity also deals with the perception of the universe of what it really is free of any human influence or emotion. Subjectivity on the other hand is based on human emotions or experiences. These emotions, experiences or perceptions are unique to each one of us and we are the only ones who can decipher its meaning. Subjectivity is also the reason why we have opinions. Biases arise from opinions of people which are often a major cause of dispute not only among the scientific community but also within the population itself. For so long there have been talks about the elimination of subjectivity most especially in the field of science because it generates the idea that the results of an experiment is not accurate enough without the use of tools for measurement such as rulers, tape measures etc. It also reduces much of the perceptive variability of individual observers. The results of measurements are expressed on a numerical scale of standard units so that everybody else understands them the same way. But does science always have to be objective?
Science is long thought to be absolutely objective because data exist in an eternally given state. Work of philosophers such as Thomas Kuhn, Karl Popper and Auguste Comte came up with theories that science is not absolutely objective. According to Kuhn science follows a paradigm. For example when research or experiments are done junior scientists are educated wherein only scientists who are influential acquire the reputation and status to assess authority over matters of dispute and those scientist have a vested interest in maintaining the position of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “Science contributes moral as well as material blessings to the world. Its great moral contribution is objective, or the scientific point of view. The means doubting everything except facts; it means hewing to the facts, lets the chips fall where they may.” (163)…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roselle Public Schools

    • 548 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Scientists make careful observations, ask questions based on their observations, form hypotheses, conduct experiments and analyze data. They communicate their findings to other scientists for review and try to avoid bias.…

    • 548 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Sir Karl Popper, science is an ‘open’ belief system. An open belief system is where every scientist’s theories are open to scrutiny, criticism and testing by others. For example everyone has access to scientific information and none is kept away from the public or other scientists. Popper believes that science is governed by the principle of falsificationism whereby scientists seek to falsify existing theories by deliberate experiments that might produce information which would contradict the current theories. In Popper’s views, the growth of our understanding of the world is based on the discarding of falsified claims. Scientific knowledge is built upon as new claims arise which would mean it’s cumulative. Science as a sustainable and sturdy belief system is questionable. Despite great achievements, it isn’t possible to take the current theories as unquestionably true. For example, for centuries it was believed the sun revolved around the earth however, Copernicus falsified this knowledge-claim.…

    • 1538 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Exam 1 Study Guide

    • 2446 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Science as a way of knowing provides for objective means to build a body of knowledge…

    • 2446 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Scientists elucidated on subjects they knew little about, as they used the “objectivity of science” to validate their drawn up conclusions, which resulted in continuous fallacies and common errors based…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    key points

    • 2984 Words
    • 9 Pages

    1. Science is the use of systematic methods to obtain objective and accurate knowledge, including controlled observation and the first-hand collection of data and evidence. Its goals are to explain, to generalize, and to predict the relationship between different properties or phenomena.…

    • 2984 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Module 1-2 Notes

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages

    • It is commonly assumed that the scientific method is objective and reliable to reveal truth.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientific objectivity, according to Louise Antony and Thomas Kuhn, is fundamentally unattainable because of the human epistemological condition. The open-mindedness, or freedom from existing notions, that pervades almost all definitions of “objectivity” is inherently uncharacteristic of the human mind, and Antony explains that scientific reluctance to entertain new, controversial hypotheses is one manifestation of this innate mental road-block. When scientists view data that contradicts the central principles of their discipline, scientists react by questioning the data, not the principles. Antony argues, however, that adhering to accepted axioms, such as the idea that atoms are the fundamental constituents of all matter, enables scientific progress. Without the basic framework, or paradigm, that views atoms as the basic units of all chemical elements, chemistry would never have developed and, needless to say, advanced.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biology Study Guide

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Scientific knowledge is not absolute, because the possibility is always held open that new experiments may one day prove it wrong.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Popper science is an open belief system where every scientist’s theories are open to scrutiny, criticised and tested by others. He says that science is governed by the principle of falsificationism. This is whereby scientists set out to try and falsify existing theories, deliberately seeking evidence that would disprove them. Such as the fact that the big bang is a theory that everyone accepts but there is much more that scientists do not know and more needed to be found therefore it could be false. It argues that there always can be more and more evidence for every theory that has ever been made and proven. Then when disproving these knowledge claims allows scientific world to grow. It is cumulative, whereby it builds on achievements of previous scientists. This explanation shows that science can be a belief system as nothing can ever be proven 100% as there will always be something or someone that will disprove a theory with other evidence and therefore people belief what they have been told. This is much like religion in a way by the fact that religion cannot be proven it is something that people belief in.…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Physics C-100

    • 1941 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Science is a body of knowledge that is ever changing. It is made up of not only facts but also theories that are made up of well-tested hypotheses.…

    • 1941 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Darwin Objectivity

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Empirical data is in the rawest format and isn’t influenced by personal opinions or other presuppositions. This leads into objectivity as well. It is impossible for scientists to come to conclusions unbiasedly. Therefore, the use of objectivity is fundamentally the morality of science. It is what…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Curtlers reasons for rejecting ethical relativism and subjectivism are many. However, before I discuss these reasons it is important to note that there are several forms of arguments. One being cultural relativism that makes statements based on an individuals culture. Another form that is closely related to relativism is subjectivism. Subjectivists make statements based on their individual beliefs as well as accounting for context. Subjectivists ethical decisions may differ based on their personal opinions. Lastly objectivism claim that there is an absolute ethical truth that exists independent of us almost like a “one-size-fits all” ethical truth. However we are just not intelligent or rational enough to perceive it.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scientific Process

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The real process of science is nonlinear and looks more like a circled chart. The first step of this in depth process is usually just a bunch of scientists poking around making observations, asking questions, sharing data and ideas, finding inspiration, and exploring the literature. When it comes to observation though scientists are not limited to just what they see it is also made up of things unknown to the eyes like, smells or tastes for example. Of course these observations will turn to a hypothesis that needs to be tested and gone over. The next step happens to be scientific testing which also happens to be the heart of…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A scientist would initially observe and classify data. He would proceed to look for pattern in the data and formulate a hypothesis. Following this, the scientist would make a predication. The scientist would test this predictions through experiments. If the experimental results confirm the hypothesis, a scientific law has been discovered. The scientific method limits the influence of bias and prejudice in the experimenter. It provides an objective, standardized approach to conducting an experiment and, in doing…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays