Preview

Obama's Core Values

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
354 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Obama's Core Values
When a president begins his speech by paying tribute to the army that is fighting a war in a foreign country and sponsored by the taxpayer’s money, the American people have reasons to be suspicious of the president’s core values. The same skepticism applies when one hears Obama asserting that “when our interests and values are at stake, we have a responsibility to act” and this statement ultimately rises up a question: what interests and values is the president talking about? Once you begin wondering about this sort of ideologies, you are ultimately promoting a thoughtful discussion. The extract 9 illustrates Obama’s appealing to force rather than reason to legitimize the use of U.S. military in Libya. Obama’s argument is trying to gain the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay: Core Values Today

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In order to live day by day, I simply follow five core values that make me the person I am today. The five core values that I live by are: family, education, honesty, responsibility, and open-minded. Core values are important to live by because they are what makes a person and it is important to see someone’s characteristics of what they value. According to dictionary.com, the definition of value is “the regard that something is held to deserve; the importance, worth, or usefulness of something” (dictionary.com, 2016). Like the definition states, values are something of importance and each individual cherishes different values, which they find important and what fits their lives in the best way. My family are the one’s who…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Purpose: Highlight three main points from the book “The Gamble: General Petraeus and the American Military Adventure in Iraq.” Thomas E. Ricks…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    President George Bush’s letter to Iraqi President Saddam Hussein is, at least on the surface, a persuasive piece intended to convince the Iraqi leader to withdraw his forces from occupied Kuwait before war breaks out. Upon closer reading, however, the critical reader will see that Bush’s "argument" is, in fact, not much of a rational argument (let alone a convincing one), which is odd in that Bush himself repeatedly points out that much is at stake. The superficiality of the American President’s argument leads one to seek out other more likely purposes.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    C200 Exam

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. In President Obama’s speech at West Point, he announced that 30,000 additional troops would be sent to Afghanistan. He made this decision because he said it was vital to the United States’ national interest. The vital national interest at risk in President Obama’s address is the security and safety of the American people as well as the “security of our allies and the common security of the world.” By involving the military and increasing the troop strength, President Obama can achieve the objectives of his strategy. His objectives are to keep the Taliban from becoming powerful, prevent them from government rule, improve Afghanistan security forces and government so they can manage their own country and prevent Al Qaeda from establishing refuge in other countries. If you follow the framework of several important U.S. documents, such as the National Defense Strategy (NDS) and Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) they will outline this same strategy. The National Defense Strategy states that it is the responsibility of the military to protect ourselves and our allies from attack. It states that the military should help protect and secure our vital interests abroad. U.S. security is linked with the security of the international community. The physical integrity of our country is protected by the military through multiple security controls. One of these security controls is through deployments of the armed forces. The Quadrennial Defense Review states the mission of the U.S. military is to protect the American people and advance our nation’s interests. The vital interests of the United States are intertwined with the integrity and resilience of allies abroad. Our vital interests are security, prosperity, broad respect for universal values and an international order that promotes cooperation among our allies. The President’s vision is to become more powerful domestically while bringing together all elements of national power. We need to help our neighbors…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 2009 Afghanistan surge, the “bargaining paradigm”, defined by Allen , best reflects President Obama’s decision making process by which he used the ethical lens of “deontology”, discussed by Shaw , as the moral compass of his decisions.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States. Throughout history, the motivation of man’s self-interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power. Habeas Corpus is written in the constitution as a right of the people and should be a safeguard to protect all accused persons, but many presidents have found ways not to enforce the right. In history the writ of habeas corpus has been challenged by many president from Lincoln to most recently Bush with abuse of power by the president. I will exam whether the president goes against the constitution to protect the safety of its citizens in a time of war or is it an abuse of power because the president is the commander and chief. Is the president acting on behalf of the people or is it a personal agenda.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thesis: The duty to protect and intervene in other counties affairs, militarily if necessary, to protect freedom, liberty and to prevent genocide, ethnic cleansing, and other atrocities is a doctrine to which the United States of America should hold fast to under all circumstances. Throughout American history, the government has struggled to define the fundamental purpose of U.S foreign policy: whether or not the US should intervene internationally to promote freedom and preserve democracy or to maintain national sovereignty. The international community and the obligation that it holds to preserve peace is a responsibility not to be taken lightly. The commitment to uphold freedom and liberty as stated by our very own Pledge of Allegiance should…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Words That Work Outline

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first of the three main points is the “It’s not what you say, it’s what people hear” mantra. This statement is repeated numerous times to reinforce the central theme of the book. He uses examples such as Jimmy Carter’s “infamous ‘malaise’ speech.” The author points out that although the former president never uttered the word “malaise,” people recognize the speech in question as such. President Carter was actually talking about America’s “crisis of confidence” not expressing his “malaise” about the crisis. Another example is when former secretary of state Colon Powell spoke of the need for “decisive force” to win every war that America engages. However, the American people translated this in to “overwhelming force” which is nearly the opposite of what Colon Powell meant. He meant for a surgical and precise type of force. While this can be overwhelming to an enemy, the latter has a connotation of vast numbers of soldiers and a violent onslaught to which the enemy eventually succumbs. To summarize, the author backs up his mantra with multiple real world examples.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the most widely debated issues in American politics is what specific role the United States should take in world crises. Some would argue that it is the US’s responsibility to promote and defend freedom, human rights, and democracy. Others disagree and take the opinion that the US should not impose its values on other nations or get involved in civil wars or other disputes. Despite one’s political opinion, it is necessary for the military to be adequately prepared to engage in combat. Readiness for any mission should include timely and accurate intelligence reports, well-trained and well-armed troops, and competent leadership. Examining Operation Gothic Serpent, it becomes evident that several of these prerequisites were lacking and contributed to the operation’s bloody outcome.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his primetime televised speech on Tuesday night, President Obama addressed the nation on the supposed threat of Syria’s chemical weapons. He tried to make a convincing case for why the U.S should intervene in the Syrian civil war. He argued that the U.S should respond to Syrian president Bashar al Assad’s use of chemical weapons as this a was a crime against humanity. He also argued that by responding to this attack that it would send a message to the “tyrants” who might use such weapons again in the future. However his case wasn’t strong enough. He failed to convince Americans citizens that intervening in Syria’s civil war was a good decision. He was not able to provide a strong enough argument why the Syrian regime should be punished for their actions as majority of the points he made were weak, and there were multiple contradictions presented in his case.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Just War Theory

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages

    What justifies war? Who justifies it? Why as human beings do we feel the need to fight, harm, and kill others to achieve certain goals? These questions have been pertinent to our society since the beginning of time and continue to challenge us to better understand the human psyche, and code of ethics that give Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Coast Guardsmen, and Marines credence to kill in the name of the United States of America. These ethics of war lay the foundation for that code of understanding and righteousness for when it is justifiable to pull the trigger and take the life of another, or commit an act of war.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The year of 2014 has proven to be that no president gets a free pass when it comes to difficult international decisions. Over the last term and a half, the Obama administration really has been picking up the disruptions of the Middle East right where Bush left them while simultaneously being dealt with more issues of diplomacy. The occurrences involving Ukraine and Syria have, in opinion, shown the current administrations true colors. It is the prime example of the realism ideology and the contrast between “hard” and “soft” power. In both situations, Obama has shown great reluctance in putting to use the American military. Although tens of thousands Syrians have been murdered and Ukraine has been under direct attack from Russia, present administration has moved from the “hard power” that killed Osama bin Laden and essentially ended the war in Iraq to a potential isolationist. However, as some could argue, like Stephan M. Walt, “foreign policy is not philanthropy.” Unless allies have direct benefits for the United States, perhaps the nation has no business jumping to the rescue (Walt). In other words, America is once again bringing focus back to the home front and has the potential of taking a more realist approach to foreign policy than ever before. If the nation truly does not want to look out for the interest of fellow democratic states simply because it…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Many presidents of the United States of America have constructed doctrines during their terms in office that have come to define their foreign policy aims, from James Monroe in 1823 right up until the very recent Bush Doctrine. This essay will focus on three of these doctrines, namely the Monroe Doctrine of 1823, the Truman Doctrine of 1947 and the Reagan Doctrine of 1984. Although there are many other presidential doctrines in the history of American foreign policy, several of these, such as Polk’s doctrine in 1845 and the Eisenhower Doctrine of 1957, appear to simply be reiterations of previous presidential doctrines. We will see that, although rhetoric is used quite freely in the president’s announcements of their doctrines, it would be wide of the mark to argue that the doctrines themselves are merely rhetoric. Instead should become clear that the doctrines shaped American foreign policy not only during the doctrine’s author’s term in office, but also for many of his successors.…

    • 4124 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Our goal is to be a leader and innovator in the field of producing leaders and innovators. This requires our organization, from CEO to groundskeepers, to engage continuously in a process of honest self-evaluation; critical analysis; creative and courageous experimentation in problem-solving; and relentless application of lessons-learned in our operational duties, pedagogy, and personal relationships. It requires us, also, to be fair, broad-minded, and inclusive at all times, flexible in our approaches, willing to experiment—even to fail—so long as failures are but steps in a refining process. As we recognize our mutual-interdependence, we resolve to be considerate and supportive of one another, for our ultimate success is not built on personality, but cooperation, and our greatest strength lies, not in our individual talents, but in the sum of our collective efforts.…

    • 5133 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been no specific empirical study of the rhetoric of Obama’s speeches when speaking about foreign policy or the military intervention in Libya. The purpose for this proposal is to address whether the U.S. invasion of Libya under the Obama administration have the same ideological justifications as did the Bush Administration in going into Iraq and Afghanistan. This addresses both the lack of empirical evidence in the field of U.S. foreign policy and the weakness in the sampling strategy of previous studies such as Santos and Teixeira’s that Libya is a relatively newer state of U.S. military intervention. This is consistent with the exploratory purpose of this study that is to analyze a president’s speeches the same way Santos and Teixeira…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays