Preview

Nuremberg Trials Research Paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
106 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nuremberg Trials Research Paper
The Nuremberg Trials Few people know about the Nuremberg Trials. Learning about the Allies, the Defendants, and the verdicts in these trials may help us understand more about them.
The Allies
The Allied Leaders were determined to bring Nazi leaders to justice for their crimes. These feelings only grew in the final months of World war II. From 1945 to 1949, the Allies held the Nuremberg Trials in Nuremberg, Germany. This is the place where the Nazis held huge rallies. On December 9th, 1948, the UN passed the Genocide Convention. This was designed to overcome the claims of Nuremberg defendants that they had violated no laws.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Adolf Hitler's 5 Million Jew Research Paper
    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Adolf Hitler's 5 Million Jew Research Paper

    In the words of Fiona Beck "Connection doesn't care about the laws of the land. Your soul will be pulled to the place it belongs." What Fiona means is that it doesn't matter what you want, you will always be connected to anything at all times. This essay will show you how Adolf Hitler is connected to Happiness.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Nuremburg Trials
    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Nuremburg Trials

    Many people have thought of the Nuremburg Trials as a very controversial topic, but I really only see one side to it. In my opinion, I believe that the Nuremburg Trials was a good and fair way to bring German military officials to justice. Firstly, after what they had done to the Jews, the Trials were the least that the Allies could have done. During WWII, the Nazi’s altogether managed to murder over 6 million Jews across Europe, so punishing the people who participated in the genocide wouldn’t be unfair at all. Therefore, the men who were forced to attend the Nuremburg Trials deserve to face the consequences for their crimes against humanity. In addition, if the trials never happened, the tragedy that happened to the Jewish population would have been left unanswered. For example, there were many Jewish holocaust survivors that had lost family and friends who were desperately looking for justice and revenge. For the sake of all the tragedies that the Jews had to face, the…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evaluate the effectiveness of the domestic and international legal systems in dealing with international crime
    • 538 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Evaluate the effectiveness of the domestic and international legal systems in dealing with international crime

    Since the end of the World Wars, international criminal tribunals have had a growing role in the prosecution of international crime. In November 1945 the allied powers got together and showed procedural fairness against the Nazi officials. For crimes against humanity, this was the first time this occurred on a global scale. In the…

    • 538 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Happened To The Romanov Family
    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Happened To The Romanov Family

    2. What were the results of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and what happened to the Romanov family?…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was Auschwitz Justified Persuasive Essay
    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Was Auschwitz Justified Persuasive Essay

    During 1940 -1945, when the death camp Auschwitz-Birkenau was operating, the allies (The United States, Britain and Soviets) were well informed about the atrocities occurring at these camps, but failed to send support. World leaders had knowledge about the genocide and mass murder in early 1940s as it began to unfold around the world but did nothing about it. Winston Churchill, and Franklin Roosevelt presented as speech to give a public warning to Germans in 1942 after Germany announced the execution of Jewish civilians, but this was the most support Jews got, as the allies believed winning the war was more important. One key example of this was when Winston Churchill stated in July 1944, that “This was the most horrible crime ever committed in the whole history of the world” after receiving a report on Auschwitz, however little was done by the British Empire to stop the horrific crimes that were occurring at these camps.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing The Salem Witchcraft Trials And The Nuremberg Trials
    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparing The Salem Witchcraft Trials And The Nuremberg Trials

    The trials were a series of military courts, held by the Allied forces of World War II, defendent for the courts were men in the political, military, and economic leadership of the Nazi Germany. The first and best known of these trials was the Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, which was aginst 22 of the most important captured leaders of Nazi Germany. It was held from November 20, 1945 to October 1, 1946. The second set of trials of lesser war criminals was conducted under Control Council Law No. 10 at the US Nuremberg Military Tribunals; among them included the Doctors' Trial and the Judges'…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gerda Klein And The Holocaust
    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gerda Klein And The Holocaust

    Hitler had taken over, 121 new laws and ordinances were made to make life difficult for German Jews, they were called the Nuremberg laws, and they lasted from 1935-1939. Men were killed off or sent to work, all ages, young and old. Through all the chaos and killing, Gerda Weissman Klein had survived to tell her story about her time during the Holocaust.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Jury Trial Analysis Paper
    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jury Trial Analysis Paper

    In this paper I will provide an analysis of a jury trial; my analysis will focus on the right of the defendant. I will articulate how a defendant 's rights at trial can be assured when it comes to The defendant’s right to a speedy trial, the defendant’s right to an impartial judge and the defendant’s right to an impartial jury.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jury Trial Research Paper
    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury Trial Research Paper

    High profile cases being spread through the media attracting massive attention. Cases such as the Sean Bell shooting, Amadou Diallo, and these trials were spread all throughout television which sometimes doesn’t fall in the favor of the defendant. There are two types of trials a bench trial also known as a court trail and a jury trial. NYS procedural law 260.10, states that every criminal depending on the crime must be trialed with 12 randomly selected jurors. The bench trial is another term for a judge trial without the jurors. The bench trial is conducted in this fashion; both parties present their evidence or make their opening statement. After the plaintiff finishes presenting his evidence, the defendant presents…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Trial Court Research Paper
    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Trial Court Research Paper

    ). The sources of US Law are important because they secure our general wellbeing, and guarantee our rights as natives against misuse by other individuals, by associations, and by the administration itself. We have laws to accommodate our general wellbeing. These exist at the neighborhood, state and national levels, and incorporate things such as laws that originate from the Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution, that ensure our fundamental opportunities like the right to speak freely, religion, and the press. Laws that shield us from segregation in light of our race, sex, age, or due to an incapacity. In the United States, the Constitution is a definitive wellspring of the law. Be that as it may, it was never intended to address each particular…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Holocaust War Crimes
    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Holocaust War Crimes

    In order to seek justice for these war crimes, many trials were held. The first declaration officially noting the mass murder of Jews, resolving to prosecute those responsible, was noted on December 17, 1942 by the leaders of the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union (War Crimes Trials). The people responsible for the war crimes were to be sent back to the countries where such crimes haf been committed and judged accordingly to the laws of that nation (War Crimes Trials). Justice was the only reasonable solution to this situation. Many nations which Germany occupied during World War 2 or who collaborated with the Germans in the persecution of certain populations, espically Jews, have also held national trials in the years following World War 2 (War Crimes Trials). The goal of the post war trials was to punish all of the people charged with offenses recognized as crimes in Article 2 of the Control Council of Law no 10 (War Crimes Trials). Due to the heinousness of such crimes, it was vital of authorites to go to such extremes. These post war trials really helped bring peace to many of the victims of the crimes.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Holocaust Research Paper
    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Holocaust Research Paper

    Anti-Semitism in Europe did not begin with Adolf Hitler. Though use of the term itself…

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Racially Directed Crimes
    • 83 Words
    • 1 Page

    Racially Directed Crimes

    At issue was the question of state sovereignty and the fact that the Nazis did not hold a monopoly on racially directed crimes (even if the Nazi goal of complete extermination was at the extreme). The great powers faced a quandary. The atrocities of the Nazis had to be punished. The U.S. was lukewarm to the idea of prosecuting Nazis for crimes committed within Germany's borders. As Justice Robert Jackson, head of the U.S. delegation to the London Conference put it in…

    • 83 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Holocaust Research Paper
    • 3273 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Holocaust Research Paper

    The Holocaust was one of the twentieth century's greatest tragedies that were made possible by anti-Semitism, the indifference of other nations, isolationism politics, and outright fear.…

    • 3273 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Nuremberg Trials
    • 2211 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Nuremberg Trials

    More than half a century has passed since the end of World War Two and to this day it is still difficult to fully understand the severity of what was by far the most destructive war in human history. More than sixty million people were killed during World War Two and more than half of those were innocent town’s people. Among the dead were over six million Jews, which was two thirds of the total living race in Europe at the time. Beyond these general statistics were thousands of stories of crimes committed against soldiers and civilians. These crimes against humanity included cases of prisoners of war being murdered, sent to concentration camps and abuse as well as harmless civilians being rounded up and “exterminated” in death camps. At the end of the war, the Allies (USA, France, Britain, and Russia) felt that the Germans had to be held accountable for their inhumane actions and felt justified to punish the Nazis in an international court of law. On November twentieth, 1945 the Nuremberg trials began where twenty one of the top Nazi leaders where being prosecuted for their crimes during the war. All of the Nazi defendants were considered innocent until proven guilty and were allowed to defend themselves against the charges. Some of the defendants such as Alfred Jodl, Wilhelm Keitel and Hans Frank used the defence that they were just following orders. Other defendants like Karl Doenitz and Albert Speer admitted their actions were wrong. Herman Goering believed his actions were for the greater good of Germany. After researching and gaining the knowledge of the Nuremberg Trials I believe that all six of these Nazi leaders are guilty and I think the judges decided on appropriate sentences for each of the accused. All six of these men helped lead the Germans to commit some of the most brutal crimes the world has ever seen and each of them had to face the consequences of their actions.…

    • 2211 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics