Preview

Nullification, Andrew Jackson, The Natives and African Americans

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
583 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nullification, Andrew Jackson, The Natives and African Americans
Kiara Jackson History Mr.Gubellini

Nullification, Andrew Jackson and the Natives, and African Americans the results what took place. There are some things in the world like crisis, personal point of views, and different approaches about many things; some other things unexplainable and maybe unnecessary, but in this case that is most likely not the point. The point is between 1828 and 1845 there were some attempts at changing the government and our lives. Some of these attempts were successful, but only over time did it take for them to pass through congress.
The Nullification Crisis was one of the first attempts at changing our government during the early 1800’s when South Carolina’s economy depended on manufactured goods from England. The tariffs made the goods real expensive, Congress then passed a new tariff “ The Tariff Of Abominations” in 1828. There was a negative effect on S.C. and they threatened to secede from the union. The Vice President John Calhoun then argues for “nullification” to declare a federal law not constitutional. Calhoun felt that this was right since the states had created the Federal Union. November 1832 S.C. voted to nullify the tariffs. President Jackson who was elected also in 1832 felt that the nullification was an act of treason. President Jackson then sent war ships to S.C. and congress passed the Forced Bill to allow presidents to use military force to enforce the acts of congress. Before the showdown occurred congress passed a bill to lower taxes until 1842. S.C. then repealed the nullification of the tariff law.
Andrew Jackson and The Native Americans was an attempt on changing our lives and the way we lived. Andrew Jackson thought that the Natives should be removed and put at the Great Plains. In 1830 Jackson had congress pass a law called “ The Removal Act” which provided the money to relocate them. Most of the Natives packed up and resettled to the west. On the other hand the Cherokee’s that were in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Nullification Crisis

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The nullification crisis represented sectionalism, as a cause to the Civil War by creating hostility and conflict between the North and South. The South was extremely opposed to the Tariff of Abominations and the following Tariff of 1833. Sectionalism is defined by petty distinctions at the cost of well being. The Southern states didn't need protective tariffs because their economy was already very stable from the wealth of the cotton industry. Therefore, the tariffs only stopped their foreign trade and did nothing to benefit them. South Carolina became so enraged that when Congress declared the tariff on 1828, many of the southern people said they were going to back out of the union or secede. After this, Vice President Calhoun, who was born in South Carolina, wanted to legally resist the tariffs. He created the idea of nullification in 1828. John Calhoun wrote the "South Carolina Exposition and Protest," which declared the tariff null and void in South Carolina. Nullification was the theory that a state had the ability to declare invalid a federal-level law. So when the national government instituted a tariff, Calhoun told the South Carolina that they could simply refuse to pay it.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Nullification Crisis was led by John C. Calhoun in result of the increased Tariff of 1828, known as the Tariff of Abominations. South Carolina declared these tariffs to be unconstitutional and threatened to leave the union. Calhoun proposed the nullification theory which stated that each state had the right to obey a federal law or to declare it null and void. Andrew Jackson, who favored states’ rights, did not approve of disunion. In result, Jackson issued a Proclamation to the People of South Carolina stating that nullification and disunion were treason and he threatened to take military action.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Andrew Jackson was a war hero turned president, but his battles did not end with his election. One type of problem Jackson faced was economic. South Carolinian planters saw that the protective tariff, passed by Congress in 1824, as oppressive since most of the revenue made from it was invested in the northeast’s manufacturing industry. They were more infuriated when the tariff was raised in the summer of 1828 (Brinkley 207). The South Carolinians and Vice President John C. Calhoun saw the taxes as “blatantly unconstitutional, exceeding Congress’s powers to raise necessary revenues and oppressing one section of the country while enriching others” (Wilentz 63). A nullification document written by Calhoun known as the South Carolina Exposition and Protest was passed by the state legislature in 1832 as a response. This text announced that any state could declare its original sovereignty and disregard federal laws that are found offensive in their borders. In retaliation, Jackson sent federal troops to South Carolina to enforce the law, but before any violence could ensure the state backed down (Brinkley 207). This created a strong rift between the Jackson and his vice president that turned in to a bitter rivalry between the two. Jackson’s…

    • 1818 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson Dbq

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Quickly in Jackson’s presidency he tried to start an era of social reform. During his presidency he founded a party that called themselves American Democracy. A main factor was the Indian Removal. This affected the lives of many Indians. This piece from the Cherokee letter can sum of the thoughts of the Indians, “We are overwhelmed! Our hearts are sickened, our utterance is paralyzed, when we reflect on the condition in which we are placed, by the audacious practices of unprincipled men, who have managed their stratagems with so much dexterity as to impose on the Government of the United States, in the face of our earnest, solemn, and reiterated protestations.”…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Democrats

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A major problem for Jackson was what to do with Native Americans living in the South and on this issue Jackson decided he had to do what was best for his people. (Document G)Native Americans living in the South were driven away from their lands to Oklahoma on a path known as the Trail of Tears. This allowed southerners to expand their farms and made available more growing space. Andrew Jackson fought against the Supreme Court to get this approved; this only proved that Jackson was for his people.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson was in no uncertain terms, a tyrant. Specifically to native Americans, but somewhat extending to the African American slave population as well. Under Andrew Jackson’s administration, the policy of Indian Removal saw its greatest enactment. Jackson essentially forced the Native Americans off their lands, all the while ignoring supreme court decisions that stated such actions were indeed unconstitutional.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Age of Jackson Dbq

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, dictating that all Indians living in the Deep South had to move to Eastern Oklahoma, because the Indians had something everyone else wanted, land. Jackson says in his First Inaugural Address,“It will be my sincere and constant desire to observe toward the Indian tribes within our limits a just and liberal policy, and to give that humane and considerate attention to their rights and their wants which is consistent with the habits of our Government and the feelings of our people.” Jackson is saying that It will be his genuine and continuous desire towards the Indian tribes, and we want to give them a fair and open policy, and give humane and kind attention to their rights and their wants which is the same with the habits of our government and the feelings of our people. He wants to give the Indian tribes a good policy. Later on, he removes the Indian tribes from their homes in the Deep South and makes them march on the trail of tears, where they relocate to Eastern Oklahoma.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1838 and 1839 Andrew Jackson from Tennessee was forceful on Indian Removal, and from 1814 to 1824 jackson was instrumental in negotiating nine out of 11 treaties, which had devastated the southern tribes of their eastern lands in the west. So the Cherokee indians were tired of it so they went to the supreme court. The n in 1830 Jackson pushed a whole new piece of legislation called the “Indian Removal Act”. Jackson’s attitude towards the Native Americans came off as rude because he did not like the Indians and he wanted them gone.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jackson Legacy

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Nullification Crisis, created by South Carolina’s Ordinance of Nullification that stated that the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 were null and void within the boundaries of South Carolina had a positive effect on Jackson’s legacy. It was a positive effect because it protected Americans. Jackson was against Nullification because he was a supporter of the Union, so he took action against this by nullifying the nullification. He wasn’t a man to “stare down”, he prepared his military to assail the “Nullies,” the people in favor of nullification of the tariff. Finally, the compromise tariff of 1833 was approved. Jackson's influential actions for the Crisis helped identify the powers of the central government more clearly; showing to the states that he would not suffer their tyranny. Even though this was a positive effect for Jackson’s legacy, it could also be negative effect of tyranny.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It has been rare in American history for presidents and vice-presidents not to get along, but it has happened on a few occasions: Adams and Jefferson, Kennedy and Johnson, and Eisenhower and Nixon are a few examples (Jackson vs. Calhoun-Part 1 1). However, the most controversial relationship between president and his assistant was between Andrew Jackson and John C. Calhoun. Their disagreements began very early on in Jackson's administration, and lasted until after the resolution of the Nullification Crisis. Nullification is the refusal of a state to recognize a federal law within its boundaries and deem that law unconstitutional. In this case, South Carolina, led by John C. Calhoun, refused to recognize the protective tariffs in 1828, and 1832, saying that they benefited the North and injured the South. At this point in time, the American system of government was fairly new and the struggle between state and federal power was in full swing. Towards the end of the crisis, Calhoun went so far as to threaten to secede from the Union to show Jackson and the rest of America that individual state governments were indeed powerful. When the quarrel had reached its peak, Jackson had had enough and decided it was time to put an end to the crisis. The actions and decisions made by President Andrew Jackson in regards to John C. Calhoun and the Nullification Crisis not only enabled the Union to remain together, but proved the power of the federal government.…

    • 1430 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1829 Andrew Jackson created the Indian Removal Act. The Indian Removal Act was a law that stated that Native Americans that were settled east of the Mississippi River had to move west of the river to a portion of land that was set aside for them in the Oklahoma territory. The Cherokee Indians that were settled in Georgia became angry with the law and decided to sue the state of Georgia, because they felt like they were entitled to the land. The Supreme Court case became known as Worcester v. Georgia. It was won by the Indians and the law was proven unconstitutional. President Jackson chose to ignore the results of the case and carry on wih the law, causing the Trail of Tears. The Trail of Tears was the name given to the horrible event where Jackson force the Native Americans to travel during one of the worst winters to the other side of the Mississippi River. Jackson went against the constitution and around the verdict of the Supreme Court, so that he could get exactly what he wanted. Jackson was very unlike the presidents before him, by performing selfish deeds such as the Trail of Tears to get what he wanted.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The changes that Andrew Jackson represent in American political life are a spoils system, he removed the Natives and expanded the country onto native lands.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John G. Burnett

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During Andrew Jackson’s presidency from 1829 to 1837, a lot of controversial decisions were made. The removal of Cherokee Indians in the 1830’s was one, and this was more a change of the national policy than a reformulation. Since the Spanish came to the New World from the 1500’s, the continent’s inhabitants- Indians, were there. Beginning from the Washington government in the 1790’s, the policy United States used to administrate the Indians was civilization and assimilation. Under the ambitious administration of Andrew Jackson, who was in favor of Western speculation, the Indians were forced to move from their homeland by the American Army. This is where John G. Burnett really endures the pain that the Indians felt.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once elected Jackson wanted to better the government for the common man leaving some big marks in history during his two terms. One of the first things he did was implement the spoils system which is a practice in which a political party, after winning an election, gives government jobs to its supporters, friends and relatives as a reward for working toward victory, and as an incentive to keep working for the party. For the common man Jackson was so eager to relate to this was great news and incentive to support him. When President Jackson began office he replaced nearly 10% of government officials with his supporters. Jackson also wanted to give more power to the states so in order to do that their had to be more control of the states so this caused the indian removal act. The indian removal act was a series of treaties Andrew Jackson was granted by passing the legislature through both houses of congress. Jackson was able to forcefully remove five main indian tribes The cherokees were the only ones to fight with it and took Georgia all the way to the supreme court. Chief Justice John marshall ruled in favor of the cherokees saying that they didn’t have to move. Andrew Jackson disagreed with the decision of Chief John Marshall and rounded them up at gunpoint and forced them to move. The native americans were forced west and 1 in 4 native americans died on this journey making it known as the Trail Of Tears. Marking one of the saddest chapters in History, Jackson faced a challenging issue that shook the union, also known as the nullification crisis. South Carolina was upset with the high taxes placed on goods. Once the tariff made it to the supreme court John C. Calhoun became one of the biggest supporters and he was coquincently Andrew Jackson's personal enemy. South…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While Andrew Jackson was president of the United States, he was happy to pursue the news in the relation of the Indians Removal in the 1830’s. I believe Andrew Jackson is in a rush to remove the Indians because it will prevent differences between the General and State Governments on account of the Indians, and it will increase the size of civil populations.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays