Preview

Nuclear Weapons Persuasive Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
989 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nuclear Weapons Persuasive Essay
We have entered a new age, an age featuring a profound use of weapons and new groups who threaten the current state of the United States. In the past we have used the threat of nuclear weapons to deter these groups. But we, The United States are not united on the state of these weapons. We are split on whether we should attempt to start an anti nuclear weapon coalition, or to stockpile our weapons in order to prepare ourselves for the seemingly inevitable nuclear war.
Nuclear weapons were created in a time of war, war with more casualties than any other war previously. The second world war was undoubtedly, a terrible war and on August first, 1945 the war seemed far from over, however, after the United States utilized two atomic bombs on the Japanese, they announced their surrender. The United States utilized two atomic weapons which did kill thousands, but created a peace between us and Japan which lasts to this day. If we weigh the pros and cons, the usefulness of a limited arsenal, is much higher than the downsides. They have provided peace as well as an edge in negotiation,
We are not at war with any nuclear powerhouses, but that does not mean we will not be. The
…show more content…
The Viper was no sooner revived by the warmth than it turned upon its benefactor and inflicted a fatal bite upon him; and as the poor man lay dying, he cried, "I have only got what I deserved, for taking compassion on so villainous a creature."’ These villainous creatures exist in this world in the form of dictators, and their council, and are also not to be trusted. A person could theoretically be thoroughly convinced it is our moral obligation to disarm, but won’t in fear of the villainous creatures. We must towards the long run, because if we do not prepare for the future, we could receive a fatal bite, just like the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Before WWII, the United States strongly supported the idea of Isolationism, meaning they did not want to be involved in wars. As the time passed the United States found them turning away from neutrality by providing armed weapons to other nations. When other countries could not afford to buy products, the U.S could not afford to lose business, so they came up with a Lend-Lease Act and Cash and Carry. Both selling and lending items such as weapons to other states, (Great Britain& France). Japan was one of the nations until the United States cut them off. Due to that, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor killing 2,403 Americans and injuring 1,178 and the U.S officially entered WWII.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear techniques were a major part of wars for the United States especially in world war II. In world war II nuclear techniques were used to help America in the war to promote their chances of them winning the war. During this time this was the nuclear age where the united states moved towards the nuclear age. The nuclear age was apart of the time where many of the war tactics were nuclear weapons. Americans in the war were helped severely by the efforts in the war with nuclear techniques. Many techniques were used during this time nuclearly. This time they were beneficial to the advancement of America.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ki-Moon Pros And Cons

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To illustrate the issue, next year the NNSA is seeking one point three billion dollars to work on six different types of nuclear weapons. Not to mention that the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the United States will use around three hundred and fifty-five billion dollars on their nuclear arsenal (Feinstein). “Furthermore, our nuclear stockpile is competing for limited defense spending, money that could be used to address more pressing challenges such as the fight against the Islamic State and defending against cyber attacks” (Feinstein). As Feinstein says, nuclear weapons are an unnecessary burden on the nation's wallet. Therefore, they need to start the process of disarmament to make room for a better solution. Another key thing to remember is that the United States is already well over 18 trillion dollars in debt and…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A fundamental component of the proliferation debate revolves around the perceived or alleged efficiency of nuclear deterrence. Proliferation optimists argue that, “more may be better” because nuclear weapons increase the cost of nuclear conflict, ultimately deterring states from engaging in nuclear warfare with a nuclear-armed state (Suzuki 2015). Optimists argue that nuclear deterrence works reliably, thus there seemingly less to be feared from nuclear proliferation and beneficial to a state to…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nuclear resources of the United States and the Soviet Union are larger, better equipped, and deadlier than at any other time in history. This incisive book contends that the superpowers, while exhibiting…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: 1. Sanger, David E., Baker, Peter. “Obama Limits When U.S. Would Use Nuclear Arms”. The New York Times. The New York Times Company, April 5, 2010. Web. January 23, 2014.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, killing thousands of innocent people! The United States did it to force Japan to surrender and end World War II. To this present day it still and will remain a controversy whether or not the US was in the right or wrong of bombing Hiroshima. I argue that the US shouldn’t have attacked Hiroshima the way they did.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the summer of 1945, the United States ravaged the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki with newly developed, top secret atomic bombs. In the many years following this event, arguments have transpired as to whether this action was ethical, and whether it was really necessary to end World War II quickly. However, due to the wartime situation and Japan’s extreme cruelty, the United States were predominantly justified in their decision to drop the atomic bombs. Dropping the atomic bombs in Japan was a strategic method to finish the Second World War, and to avenge the Japanese with minimal casualties.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Atomic bombs, a never before seen or used weapon in the eyes of the public. Sixteen hours after an atomic bomb on Hiroshima was dropped, President Truman announced this astonishing event. Many people were shocked by this and were wondering, what led Truman to drop the bomb on Hiroshima. The U.S. entered the war when the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. The bomb dropped on Hiroshima was an atomic bomb using uranium 235. "Fat Man," the bomb dropped on Nagasaki, was a plutonium bomb. Nuclear fission is when two atoms split. The splitting of certain atoms like uranium and plutonium can cause build up of energy. When enough energy is built up with a chain reaction of nuclear fission, you can get enough energy to build an atomic bomb. This is how fission bombs, like "Little Boy," are made. Implosion is when something collapses inward. "Fat Man" was an implosion bomb made with plutonium. Implosion bombs are made differently from fission bombs. One similarity that they share is that they both use fission. Implosion causes the material, in this case, plutonium, to increase density while it carries out fission. The density eventually becomes super dangerous causing a deadly explosion to happen. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were justified because these bombings ended the war, more civilian lives were saved,…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the most controversial issues of World War II is the debate on whether or not the United States should have used an atomic bomb against the Japanese. People who tend to oppose the use of the atomic bomb tend to ignore, or are ignorant, of the history of Japan during World War II. One factor to consider is the treatment of prisoners of war and civilians in countries that Japan had conquered. Another aspect was the “never surrender” mentality of the Japanese military in the territories they controlled during World War II. The final point is the estimated number of casualties for both sides. Due to these factors, the U.S. should have dropped the bomb on Japan to save lives on both sides.…

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    6 august, 1945 America had attacked Hiroshima, Japan with nuclear bomb named little boy. Nuclear bomb has taken around 10000 lives in the provenience of explosion. Three days later again an attack had occurred with the same type of the bomb named fat man in Nagasaki. The intensity of the bomb was 12500 TNT and it had caused around 4000 degree Celsius. It was enough to vaporize the flesh and bones of humans. It was a nightmare for the people of Japan.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pearl Harbour was one of the most terrible acts in history. December 7, 1941 Japan bombed a naval base in Hawaii that was called Pearl Harbor. After this incident the U.S. declared decided to declare war on Japan. After a number of years in battle the U.S. was forced to make a major decision to invade Japan or use the atomic bomb. The U.S chose to drop Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan because they wanted to completely end the war with Japan. The U.S. thought this would end the war because it was going to kill a lot of people. There was no point in dropping it because Japan was planning on giving up soon because they were losing. President Harry Truman made the wrong decisions in dropping the bomb over Hiroshima and Nagasaki because Japan was going to end the war anyways.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The US propelled atomic weapons in the mornings of August sixth and August ninth of 1945 to Japan, producing a huge number of honest deads, without tallying the back ones caused by the radiation that was in the place. Atomic weapons are probably the most huge executing gadgets weapons that have ever existed. This weapon can burn people that are in the epicenter of the bomb and the spots encompassing it in not more than seconds. This weapon ought to be dispensed with from earth since it is a peril to the planet and people, a reality that is much more terrible than creating a few many years of "worldwide peace". Likewise, it is an unfeeling approach to murder a person, that is against to any sort of good esteem.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, Nuclear Weapons have strong mass destruction. For example, The United States sent "Little boy", a uranium gun-type fission bomb to Hiroshima, Japan. 3 days Later, The United States sent " Fat Man" in Nagasaki, Japan. More than 10,000 people died from these incidents. In my opinion, Nuclear Weapons didn't kill just people, but their family, their home and their dream.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was a big decision to drop not one but two atomic bombs on Japan in World War II. That decision was one of the biggest in history and there was more than one reason for President Truman to authorize the use of atomic bombs. What he did not realize or know, was the effects it would have. The atomic bombs did not just affect Japan by their devastation, but they affected the foreign policy throughout the world for years to come.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays