Nuclear Weapons

Better Essays
Nuclear Weapons Non-Proliferation is a limitation of production such as the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The big five: United States, Britain, France, China, and former Soviet Union agreed to dismantle arsenals and signatory nations would not possess nuclear weapons (Conn). Although North Korea has become the world’s ninth nuclear power, they withdrew from the treaty in January 2003. Since then, North Korea processed enough plutonium for five nuclear bombs (Norris). America should and does have a defense against this. After the nuclear warfare in the past, many people believe it will never happen again because nobody would ever want that damage to their own country. Even though this may be true, having our own weapons is safer and better for America (Robinson). Another treaty to reduce the nuclear weapons of the world will not stop other countries from having the weapons; therefore the United States should not disengage from the nuclear stalemate to ensure the safety of the American people. The best way to ensure the safety of the American people is to make sure that other countries will not use nuclear weapons against us. A disagreement between two countries leads to conflict. Conflict leads to war. War leads to nuclear war. Nuclear war leads to an uninhabitable earth. This can be prevented with America controlling the nuclear battlefield. Despite treaties limiting nuclear weapons, “it is estimated that up to 40 nations could manufacture nuclear weapons” (Conn). Another treaty to limit all the nuclear weapons in the world would result in the United States limiting our own weapons and the same other countries ignoring this treaty like before. With 27,000 nuclear warheads around the world that could be detonated in half an hour, America needs to have its own line of defense too (Conn). One way to guarantee that nuclear weapons will not be used against us is to threaten a larger retaliation. Deterrence does work against many terrorist groups


Cited: Conn Hallinan. "The Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Is a Serious Problem." At Issue: Nuclear Weapons. Ed. Louise I. Gerdes. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. GRANT COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL DIST 124. 11 Feb. 2013 Moore, James W. "The Threat of Nuclear Terrorism Is Exaggerated." Opposing Viewpoints: Terrorism.Ed. Mike Wilson. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. GRANT COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL DIST 124. 11 Feb. 2013  Norris, Robert S, Hans M. Kristensen and Joshua Handler. "North Korea Has an Active Nuclear Weapons Program." At Issue: Is North Korea a Global Threat?.Ed. Debra A. Miller. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. GRANT COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL DIST 124. 11 Feb. 2013  Robinson, C. Paul, and James Kitfield. "The United States Should Not Eliminate Its Nuclear Arsenal." Opposing Viewpoints: Weapons of Mass Destruction.Ed. James D. Torr. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. Opposing Viewpoints Critical Thinking. Gale. GRANT COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL DIST 124. 11 Feb. 2013  William Langewiesche, interviewed by James Marcus. "The Threat of Nuclear Proliferation Is Exaggerated." At Issue: What Is Humanity 's Greatest Challenge?.Ed. Roman Espejo. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2010.Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. GRANT COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL DIST 124. 11 Feb. 2013

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Wittner, Lawrence S. "There Is an Ongoing Danger of Nuclear War." Nuclear Armament. Ed. Debra A. Miller. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2011. Current Controversies. Rpt. from "The Ongoing Danger of Nuclear War." hnn.us. 2009. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 21 Oct. 2014.…

    • 946 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first area of nuclear non-usage I will look at will be the arguments brought forward by proliferation pessimists and optimists. Kennitz Waltz, a proliferation optimist argues on one hand we cannot stop the spread of nuclear weapons. It’s inevitable because states seek power through nuclear weapons; even smaller, less powerful states align themselves with nuclear wielding states for protection and security. But on the other hand, Waltz argues states are rational actors, and believes nuclear weapons will be used responsibly, which is why nuclear weapons have not been used. For Waltz, more states who have nuclear weapons, the better. Waltz writes, “A blatant…

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sokolski, H. (2004) Getting Mad: Nuclear Mutual Assured Destruction, It’s Origins and Practice, Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute.…

    • 2601 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with the nuclear optimists that nuclear proliferation will make international politics more stable and less war prone. Since nuclear weapons are classified as weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), more specifically as true WMD (Baylis pg 386), I believe states that possess nuclear weapons will be reluctant to use them against states who also possess nuclear weapons, out of the fear those state will retaliate with their own nuclear weapons. The use of nuclear weapons poses risk to a state that chooses to use a nuclear weapon against another nuclear proliferated state. Therefore, by this logic it benefits to a state to be nuclear proliferated as a defensive precaution or a deterrence mechanism.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead we should look for tools of peace, methods of tranquility. The United States is devoted to “fight for the common defense” not vaporize and lay to waste its opponent. There is always a better way and we need to go out and find it, because we can no longer live in nuclear…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the first week of August 1945, the world saw the first and only use of nuclear weapons in warfare. America’s use of the atomic bombs on Japan, resulted in the death of over 130,000 people and caused unpredicted effects on physical health. In relation today we face ongoing issues of terrorism and the possibility of dirty bombs being deployed in the U.S. The problem is the U.S. government has an inadequate system for preventing the wrong…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds,” (Oppenheimer, 1965, 0:47). So said Julius Robert Oppenheimer, one of the men credited with creating the atomic bomb, when describing the first test detonation of a nuclear weapon on July 16, 1945, at the Alamogordo Bomb Range in New Mexico ( Sublette, 1999), as he quotes the Hindu holy text, the Bhagavad Vita. Nuclear weapons have only been used in warfare twice, both times by the United States during World War I, when the United States dropped the ‘Fat Man’ and ‘Little Boy’ bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August, 1945 (Sublette, 1999). In the 60 intervening years, a number of other nations have since developed nuclear weapons of their own. Because of nuclear proliferation, and the unparalleled destructive power of atomic weapons, nuclear non-proliferation has become an international concern, with the United States leading the charge. The past decade, however, has seen new nations try to enter the ‘nuclear club’ the most recent country being Iran. A nuclear armed Iran poses many concerns to the United States. In this paper, I will discuss the history of Iran’s nuclear program, what steps have been taken to curb the Iranians efforts, and where the two major political parties of the United States stand on the issue.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    I clearly recognize that defensive systems have limitations and raise certain problems and ambiguities. If paired with offensive systems, they can be viewed as fostering an aggressive policy, and no one wants that. But with these considerations firmly in mind, I call upon the scientific community in our country, those who gave us nuclear weapons, to turn their great talents now to the cause of mankind and world peace, to give us the means of rendering these nuclear weapons impotent and obsolete.…

    • 5226 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Govt

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To better prepare for threats from weapon of mass destruction the United States should never under estimate the power and capability of foreign allies such as China, Russia, North Korea, Iran and Iraq to strike the United States. In addition, the National Resource Defense Counsel Report should keep track of the nuclear warheads that each country has. As…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Language as aTool of War

    • 1002 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cited: John Berger. “Hiroshima”. The Mc-Graw Hill Reader: Issues across the Disciplines. Ed. Gilbert Muller. New York: McGraw Hill. 2014. 7-13. Print.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Albert Einstein Speech

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On November 11th 1947 the renowned scientist, Albert Einstein, presented his case against nuclear warfare and the real dangers that come with it. He was able to grab his audience’s attention by great use of literary devices and rhetoric techniques. The argument delivered in this speech proved to be effective because till this day a nuclear bomb has yet to be dropped.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, “The Day the Bomb Went Off,” Knoll and Postol argue nuclear bombs are catastrophic. The event of a nuclear attack would send humans back to the stone age, and put a halt on any technological advances. Furthermore, the effects of radiation would harm the population within a broad radius of a nuclear explosion. Readers may wonder what America would do under nuclear attack, and draw the conclusion nuclear bombs would destroy everything our society has accomplished.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cold War and Us Diplomacy

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages

    References: Cohen, A. (1986). Nuclear Weapons and the Future of Humanity. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In James Carroll’s essay, “If Poison Gas Can Go, Why Not Nukes?”, the author tells the readers that it is necessary to eliminate nuclear weapons from the world’s military arsenals. The author supports a universal goal of abolishing all nuclear arms because it prevents a nuclear disaster. The author wrote his essay using statistics which make it very effective. The essay as a whole is straight to the point, easy to read and understand, and well organized. The title straightforwardly tells the reader what the story is about. Although the author makes a very nice argument, the example that he uses is not an appropriate comparison to nuclear weapons. This is because poison gas is not the real problem in the world. While James Carroll views nuclear weapons as very dangerous and should not exist in the world, quite honestly, evil has always existed in people’s heart with or without the nuclear weapons, so all of the weapons should be abolished in the world.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Regardless of General Grove’s speech to the world in 1962 that the use of the world’s most destructive weapon was completely justified, there are still many main factors which were available to the United States and its allies. This marked the birth of the nuclear age which was to last for decades to come. It brought death and destruction…

    • 2168 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays