Preview

Nuclear Weapon Controversy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
935 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nuclear Weapon Controversy
The Nuclear Weapon Controversy The question of whether countries should have nuclear weapons or be able to test them is a very controversial topic among the public. "A nuclear weapon is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission or a combination of fission and fusion." (Vicky: "Nuclear Weapon"). The destructive atomic bomb is an example of a nuclear weapon. The United States used the atomic bomb to destroy the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan in 1885, which killed nearly 250,000 people and virtually ended World War II. There are also other nuclear weapons that are used and tested by several other militaries around the world. Since the atomic bombs hit Japan in 1885, two thousand nuclear weapons have been detonated for testing purposes. If nuclear weapons are so destructive, then why are they being used in the military or even on innocent people? Nuclear weapons should be banned to insure safety and peace within our planet. Since nuclear energy used in nuclear weapons is unstable, so is the capability of the nuclear weapons. If the nuclear reactions, fusion or fusion, were even the slightest unstable it may cause a destructive explosion. "If any simple miscalculation or minor accident occurred, it can have a more diverse affect; even the possibility of destroying the whole world is not very farfetched" (What are the Pros and Cons of Nuclear Weapons?"). The amount of energy and force within a nuclear weapon is so immense that any accident of the unpredictable nuclear reaction could be catastrophic. Also the reaction within a nuclear weapon occurs when "...the chain reaction process is encouraged to cascade or 'run away ', with the number of nuclear fissions and fissile neutrons increasing at an exponential rate, releasing a tremendous amount of energy" (Denton: " How do nuclear warheads work?"). The energy saved within a nuclear weapon has enough power to cause mass destruction and death. The use and


Cited: Denton." How do nuclear warheads work?". Quora. 13 May.2011. Web. 26 Nov.2011 Shah. "Nuclear Weapons". Global Issue. 29 Dec. 2009. Web. 26 Nov. 2011 Unknown Author." What are the Pros and Cons of Nuclear Weapons?".yukozimo. n.d. Web. 26 Nov.2011 Vicky."Nuclear Weapon". zeegenesis.com. 11 Oct. 2011. Web. 26 Nov. 2011

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Homework for Chapter 20

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In nuclear fission, atoms of uranium-235(any unstable nucleus with a sufficiently high number of nuclear mass) are bombarded with neutrons. Ordinarily neutrons move too quickly to split nuclei when they collide with them, but if neutrons are slowed down they can break apart nuclei. Each collision splits uranium atoms into smaller atoms and releases two or three neutrons, along with energy and radiation. Because the uranium nuclei is surrounded by innumerous number of other similar nuclei; the extra neutrons; besides the releasing of the energy of the previous nuclei that kept the repulsing protons together; begins to break them apart in the same manner leading to a series of chain reaction.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas nuclear fission occurs when the nucleus of an atom splits into smaller subatomic particles. Although both nuclear fission and nuclear fusion are almost complete opposite process they both result in very high levels of energy being released. Nuclear fusion is also a natural process and requires extremely high levels of energy to occur compared to nuclear fission which requires less energy but creates a huge number of radioactive particles. The process used for the Manhattan Project was nuclear fission and it was used to spilt a uranium isotope which is what caused the unprecedented massive energy…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nuclear bomb is dangerous and scary weapon that really should have never been thought of or invented. Nuclear bombs have been the focal point of every country's scientists ever since World War II when the U.S. dropped them on Japan. Just seeing the death and destruction a nuclear bomb can cause to people and the environment just proves my point. Not one person should have the power to just be able to push a button and have the ability to tear another country to shreds.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason to this argument is valid because nuclear weapons can kill millions of people and destroy everything. This is true because “environments of nature could be ruined”. Furthermore “future generations will have to deal with destruction and health complications”. This shows that nuclear weapons pose as a threat to the Earth and all living species. For all the reasons stated above the damage done in Hiroshima, shows proof of how harmful nuclear weapons are.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    6 august, 1945 America had attacked Hiroshima, Japan with nuclear bomb named little boy. Nuclear bomb has taken around 10000 lives in the provenience of explosion. Three days later again an attack had occurred with the same type of the bomb named fat man in Nagasaki. The intensity of the bomb was 12500 TNT and it had caused around 4000 degree Celsius. It was enough to vaporize the flesh and bones of humans. It was a nightmare for the people of Japan.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Millions killed in nuclear disaster, thousands left homeless, countries left in peril! These are some of the many consequences that are faced in a nuclear dependent world. Day after day people live in fear that one tiny mistake, one wrong word can cripple our world and leave the survivors living in rubble. The world has discovered that despite the enormous precautions taken, disasters and destruction still constantly resurface themselves through our short, but eventful nuclear history. During World War II, Albert Einstein sent a letter to President Dwight Eisenhower that has shaped mankind from that moment on. It described a weapon that would release enough energy to destroy an entire city("USA weapons of mass destruction." ). Now nearly four score ago the consequences we face for this technology has been detrimental to our society. Scientific discoveries also yielded the idea of using this extraordinary power as an energy source and a extraordinary threat.Due to these undeniable risks, the world needs to remove all sources of nuclear weaponry and power.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear fission is the process in which large atoms such as Uranium or Plutonium are split apart when they are excessively exposed to…

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, Nuclear Weapons have strong mass destruction. For example, The United States sent "Little boy", a uranium gun-type fission bomb to Hiroshima, Japan. 3 days Later, The United States sent " Fat Man" in Nagasaki, Japan. More than 10,000 people died from these incidents. In my opinion, Nuclear Weapons didn't kill just people, but their family, their home and their dream.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Albert Einstein once said, “The explosive force of nuclear fission has changed everything except our modes of thinking and thus we drift towards unparalleled catastrophe. We shall require an entirely new pattern of thinking if humankind is to survive” Albert Einstein, 1946. Nuclear weapons are arguably the most feared weapon ever created. They have the capability to end wars, nations, and even our planet if we are not careful. So, how serious is the threat of a terrorist cell acquiring a nuclear weapon and using it in an attack? Any statement containing the words ‘nuclear and weapon’ must almost always be considered serious but what is the likelihood of a successful nuclear terrorist attack occurring? The answer is anything but straight forward and many different avenues must be explored in order to better understand this current threat.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As history has progressed, Man has always looked back and debated why certain actions occurred and whether or not such measures should have been taken. Though numerous such arguments take place, one of the most debated issues is that of the dropping of the atomic bomb at the end of World War Two. Critics of the atomic bomb argue that far too many people were killed through the United States ' use of the bomb, they state that other means were available. The fact of the matter is, only one other method was available and that was the overland invasion of Japan. The Bomb 's use, despite the many casualties it caused, actually saved lives, both American and Japanese, and prevented many more years of conflict.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Power- Ethics Study

    • 42811 Words
    • 172 Pages

    Report consists of 98 pages in total, including the Executive Summary , Bibliography and Addendas.…

    • 42811 Words
    • 172 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I feel the use of atomic weapons are needed, but they are dangerous when they enter into the wrong hands. I have asked several people what they feel about atomic weapons in the U.S. Asking my mother, she said: “I feel atomic weapons are good. They made Japan surrender, and helped end WWII.”. I also asked my roommate, and her response was: “Atomic weapons serve a good purpose, especially when it comes to bad situations regarding our country. They keep us safe, and show power.”. As I asked several friends and family, I got pretty much the same…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The creation and use of nuclear weapons were an unnecessary, unsafe, and an unethical addition to the war industries already expansive arsenal.…

    • 2175 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Introduction In the last hundred years, life expectancy doubled and many deadly illnesses were eradicated. The world would be a better place to live, had the astonishing scientific discoveries not been devalued with building the atomic bomb an invention that can destroy life on earth in an instant. Fredrick Soddy, who together with Ernest Rutherford discovered in 1901 that radioactivity involved the release of energy, described an atomic future in which humanity could transform a desert continent, thaw the frozen poles, and make the whole Earth one smiling Garden of Eden. While the poles are indeed thawing, the earth hardly looks like paradise. Instead, people fear nuclear Armageddon, and the power of the atom is becoming synonymous with death and destruction. Today, nine states have nuclear weapons and many more can easily acquire those, although only five states are officially recognized as possessing nuclear weapons by the 1968 nuclear Non- Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Those are the United States (1945), Russia (1949), the United Kingdom (1952), France (1960) and China (1964). Three states never joined the NPT but are known to possess nuclear weapons Israel (n/a), India (1974), Pakistan (1998), and North Korea (2006). Two additional states that present immediate proliferation concerns are Iran and Syria. Citizens of those states have paid a heavy price in taxes and/or sanctions and sacrificed opportunities for economic and educational development to build weapons that can destroy their lives. This paper is an overview of the 64years of proliferation history. It is intended to help understand the motives behind the decision to acquire the atomic bomb and grasp the subtle causal relationships between all actors involved in the proliferation chain. Comprehending the politics of proliferation is crucial for devising policy measures to curb the further spread of nuclear weapons. The nuclear-weapon states recognized under the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty The…

    • 7814 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: Badash, Lawrence. Scientists and the Development of Nuclear Weapons. Prometheus Books. February 28 1995…

    • 2293 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics