Nuclear Waste

Good Essays
Nuclear Waste by Richard A. Muller
Nuclear waste is a radioactive waste that is dangerous, and a fair percentage of people would agree on this topic. However, is it really dangerous or is it just harmful to an extent? In society, many debates are held over trying to prove to the world that this substance is harmful. In the essay, “Nuclear Waste,” Muller states clearly that he sides with the anti-nuke of the debate and how he pinpoints the facts of nuclear waste with great persuasion. Yet, it is uncertain whether Muller clearly has a good argument and/or answers the questions that many people linger to know.
In Richard A. Muller’s article “Nuclear Waste,” the author states clearly about how he is against the issues on nuclear waste and how it could pose a risk in society. Muller starts his essay by critiquing his opinion in a very persuasive introduction. He was very persuasive about his opinion when he states his questions about the issue like “How can we possibly make sure that this material is safe and that we can certify this material and it can be kept safe for 100,000 years?” (Muller 207) I think that these questions were purposely stated to enable the reader to answer questions that reinforce his case, and allow them to work towards taking action in some way. I also think it influences the readers and people in general to try and understand the risks of nuclear waste. We as humans need to keep in mind of the risks of nuclear waste, and how radiation could affect one’s health. As Muller have stated, “Children should be concerned about their health because the exposure of radiation can allow them to suffer quicker than adults would.” (Muller 206) Therefore, Muller presents his case with facts and his opinion on how nuclear waste can affect adults and the young as well.
While Richard A. Muller implies his opinion in being against nuclear waste, Muller seems to be convinced that he made a strong position on nuclear waste since the start. Although, I notice

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Many American’s assume that nuclear waste can be more dangerous than natural radioactive substances already present in the Earth currently. However, Richard Muller challenges this assumption in his chronicle “Nuclear Waste” by demonstrating the mathematical differences concerning the half-life of numerous radioactive substances. Basically, Muller is warning that “the dangers of storing our waste at Yucca Mountain to be small compared of the dangers of not doing so, and significantly smaller than the other dangers we ignore,” throughout his article. (p.254) Likewise, it has become common to dismiss the other present vulnerabilities, such as the “left over uranium in the soil,” earthquakes and rising mountains that Muller expresses in “My…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nuclear Waste

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In one of his lectures “Nuclear Waste” Richard A. Muller, discussing the nuclear waste problem, scientists’ attempts to find the solution, and the public’s fear around it, gives the audience his personal evaluation. He makes a point that since the nuclear waste is here, we have to store it and storing at Yucca Mountain is not the worst option, because the dangers of storing it there is smaller than the dangers of not doing so. This lecture makes me recall the tragic event in my country when one of the nuclear reactors exploded at Chernobyl nuclear plant in 1986. The consequences of this accident were and still are terrible for people and the environment in Ukraine and in surrounding countries. Furthermore, recent consequences of earthquakes and tsunamis in Japan at Fukushima nuclear plant increase the importance of the scientific debate against nuclear power, and force people around the world to come out against the nuclear power. People using nuclear power cannot control the whole process of its generation, as well as they do not know what to do with nuclear waste. Since we have nuclear waste, we are facing the necessity of disposing it. Muller notes that storing nuclear waste will not seem such unacceptable if we evaluate the danger of waste storage in comparison with two other dangers: the danger of the uranium originally mined, and the danger of the natural uranium left in the soil. The point is that we cannot guarantee the absolute security, but even the nature cannot; and the possible waste leakage is not a kind of danger that cannot be minimized.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill Mckiibben Waste

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    With all the money, we spend on the nuclear industry they nor the government have come up with a plan to get rid of the waste that does not involve dumping it in the ocean or the desert. McKibben states, “Congress is being lobbied really, really hard to fork over billions of dollars to the nuclear industry” (333). One thing about nuclear energy that can never be forgotten is the fact it can be turned into a weapon. The destruction nuclear weapons can cause is and always will be horrifying. During World War 2 a nuclear bomb was dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. The bomb destroyed most of their island, killed most of their population, and left the country filled with radiation. Nuclear weapons can cause radiation sickness, different forms of cancer, and malformations to children ("What's the Damage?"). Even factories that use nuclear energy are harmful they destroy soil used for farming and water sources. Nuclear energy contains elements such as uranium, strontium, benzene and many others ("What's the Damage?"). These are the materials that keep nuclear energy radioactive even after it is disposed of, plus it can cause birth…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power has shown to be the most reliable renewable source of energy out in the world. This type of power plant produces enormous amounts of energy and at the same time producing small amounts of waste. However, it has to be taken into account that nuclear power is exceptionally dangerous. Nuclear power plants have to be run extremely cautiously, any minor mishap can result in a disaster. Maintaining a nuclear power plant is also expensive. Sustaining a safe work environment is difficult because any little leak can cause havoc. These nuclear power plants may not emit carbon, but their waste products are even more dangerous than any other power plant. Nuclear plants produce radioactive material. The radioactive material produced by these plants have to be stored somewhere for centuries because of the longevity of the toxicity. The accidents that have occurred in the past were horrendous. To this day the effects of those individual accidents still exists. The biggest melt down occurred in Chernobyl, which to this day is inhabitable because of the extreme levels of radiation. Furthermore, terminal cancer has appeared in populations where there has been a nuclear power plant disaster. No matter how strictly a nuclear plant is run, external variables such as natural disasters are untamable. Relying on nuclear power is just too risky, especially since it’s not the only energy option out…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three Mile Island Effects

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages

    The use of Nuclear Power has always been a controversial subject, but during the technology’s…

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lat1 Task 2

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to McGovern, there are numerous health risks connected to nuclear energy and the exposure of human cells to its radiations. This is a critical aspect in the context of health and other provisions regarding this article. The entire paper discusses more on the aspects of technology and its devastating effects on health. It is vital to agree that technology has revolutionized the entire sectors of economy, health, and social aspects; nonetheless, nuclear energy has impacts that cannot be contained in the health contexts. Numerous strategies are required in order to curb the menace even there is need to embrace such technologies. This article takes a look at the health risks related to the use of nuclear energy and the importance of understanding these risks. This article acknowledges the fact that nuclear energy may have both positive and negative impacts on individual’s health. However, the only positive impact on health which is highlighted in this article is the fact that nuclear energy can be used to produce electricity which is important in maintaining and developing economies (McGovern M. H. and Tiwari J. (2009). the article acknowledges the fact that the positive impacts of nuclear technology may be dwarfed and become insignificant by the extent of the negatives associated with nuclear energy. the radiological and non-radiological risks posed with nuclear mishaps or misuse of nuclear facilities is also discussed. according to the article, the dangers of exposure to high dosages to radiation is illustrated using the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in 1986 (McGovern & Tiwari, 2009).…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As everyone knows, nuclear energy can release nuclear radiation which can kill human’s cells and serious radiation can cause death. Furthermore, radiation can result in genetic variation. Radiation also has nuclear residue. It is hard to clear, may be more than 50 years can disappear. Such as Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, now is a ghost town, no one can live in there because of the radiation residue.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Albert Einstein Speech

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On November 11th 1947 the renowned scientist, Albert Einstein, presented his case against nuclear warfare and the real dangers that come with it. He was able to grab his audience’s attention by great use of literary devices and rhetoric techniques. The argument delivered in this speech proved to be effective because till this day a nuclear bomb has yet to be dropped.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the essay, the author is not only fighting to eliminate the nuclear weapons but also trying to win the reader’s support by using some facts from World War I and the Cold War. The examples that Mr. Carroll uses illustrates how the world has experienced a reduction in chemical weapons, compared with the nuclear weapons, for example, the asphyxiating gas which began in Germany in the spring of 1915. He creates a comparison of chemical and nuclear weapons that show how both are capable of enormous destruction in a very serious and criticizing tone. By using this tone to write an essay, the readers assimilate easily into the author’s view point. Therefore, the facts in the essay might be strong enough to convince readers that the nuclear bomb is very harmful just like the poison gas used in World War I and World War II.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear energy is one of the hottest topics in the fight to a cleaner world. The number of people who believe that nuclear energy is too dangerous and unhealthy for the earth has skyrocketed because of the nuclear accidents that have happened in the past and recently. These protesters may have a lot of evidence and theories about how bad this type of energy can be, but the people who have realized that nuclear energy is the way to a cleaner and more “Green” society have proof and facts that overrule anything that the protesters say.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Richard A. Muller, an awardee of the MacArthur Fellowship and physics professor at UC Berkley, states in his 2008 essay “Nuclear Waste”, that Americans and the rest of the world are overly concerned with radioactive debris and the possibility of nuclear contamination. Muller first brings to light the most common fears of storing nuclear waste; volcanic activity in the Yucca Mountains, the area where the waste is stored, and the possibility of radioactive particles contaminating the water supply. Muller then goes on to entertain opposing viewpoints on how the waste should be disposed of. Muller then goes on to support his own claim by providing statistical data and explanations of radioactive…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Yucca Mountain

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The amount of nuclear waste produced every year is too much to deal with but there has to be a way to store it. Most countries store their waste in insoluble glasses and put them in stainless steel containers and place them deep underground in a stable rock structure away from…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If nuclear waste is harmful it should not be stored by humans, but in less to non-populated areas. “Spent nuclear fuel remains highly dangerous for prolonged periods. It has long lived radioactive materials in it that can contaminate the environment and harm public health” (USA Today). Thousands of Americans are exposed to nuclear waste sites across the country. And if we do not take action to find somewhere else to store this waste. Many innocent people will be affected in the long run.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the last century, nuclear power has been established as a reliable source of energy in the major industrialized countries. Nuclear power plants provide about 17 percent of the world's electricity. In the United States, nuclear power supplies about 15 percent of the electricity overall. Although no new plants are scheduled to be built in the United States, nuclear power is growing to be a popular producer of power. It has recently enjoyed a revival in attention and research due to the environmental concerns surrounding current conventional energy sources. Issues of regulation and safety are at the forefront of all discussions involving nuclear power. (Lillington) One of the major concerns is the radioactive waste that is produced during the fission of uranium.…

    • 2468 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “A tiny speck of plutonium-239, as little as three millionths of a gram, can cause lung cancer. One pound of plutonium-239 contains enough specks to kill nine billion people instantly” (Pringle 26). Plutonium-239 is a human-made element, also known as the most dangerous substance on earth. As a by-product of uranium fission, plutonium-239 is created by generating electricity from nuclear sources. Contrary to popular belief, nuclear energy is hazardous and threatening to health. The use of nuclear energy should be banned as evidenced by the number of accidents, health effects, and global impact.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics