Resolve: Nuclear Power Plant should be allowed
Argument # 1 - Nuclear power produces virtually no air pollution, in contrast to the chief viable alternative of fossil fuel. (logos)
Support # 1
Nuclear energy now provides the vast majority, 76.2 percent, of the U.S.’s emissions-free generation. In 2002, the use of nuclear energy helped the U.S. avoid the release of 189.5 million tons of carbon dioxide into the air, if this electricity had been produced by coal. Small, Jay Newton. "U.S. Energy Legislation May Be `Renaissance' for Nuclear Power." Bloomberg.com. Bloomberg, 22 June 2005. Web. 04 Feb. 2013. Support # 2
Nuclear power, generates far fewer greenhouse gases than ordinary fossil fuels. It is important part of the energy mix as this country and others move toward a less-carbon-intensive world. "A Reasonable Bet on Nuclear Power." The New York Times. The New York Times, 18 Feb. 2010. Web. 04 Feb. 2013. Support # 3
Solar and wind energy are nowhere near ready to take on this kind of load. Coal, oil and gas are polluters and major carbon dioxide generators — hence major contributors to global warming. Oil and gas also have geopolitical issues. Nuclear power is the only major electricity source that is both ready and does not contribute to global warming. "Nuclear Energy, Pro and Con." The New York Times. The New York Times, 26 Feb. 2012. Web. 04 Feb. 2013.
Argument # 2 - Nuclear power is the only viable course to achieve energy
independence for most Western countries.(logos)
Support # 1
Most of the electricity in the United States is produced using steam turbines.
Steam turbines are powered by fossil fuels, such as coal, petroleum(oil), and natural gas.
In 2011, coal was the fuel for about 42% of the 4 trillion kilowatt-hours of electricity generated in the United States. 25% was fueled by natural gas.
In 2011, 65% per cent of fossil fuel was imported from foreign countries.
"Electricity in the United...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document