nuclear power

Topics: Nuclear power, Fossil fuel, World energy resources and consumption Pages: 13 (3624 words) Published: May 29, 2014

Nuclear Power The Future OF Energy

Nuclear power, a phrase that isn't too far from its controversial disputes. nuclear powers debate began around the 1970s to late 1980s when American nuclear power plant in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania had a cooling malfunction that caused a part of one of its reactors partially melt inside the reactor core. Media outlets jumped onto this incident, and dramatizing the events that transpired; not intending to downplay the significance of the partial nuclear meltdown; this initial event cause many Americans to fear and stigmatize nuclear energy with a negative skew. Other incidents of nuclear power plants melting down such as Chernobyl and Fukushima only heightened the debate on nuclear power and whether it was worth the risk. But it is a well-known that nuclear power is actually far safer than other power sources such as fossil fuel, its low environmental impact and beneficial economic impact. Due the to social, economic and environmental benefits, nuclear power is the right choice for America's energy needs in the future.

Social benefits are seen in nuclear power by improved safety compared to coal power plants and to reduce deaths caused by fossil fuel power pollution. For example, Patrick Moore's article states "the multiagency U.N. Chernobyl form reported last year that 56 deaths could be directly attributed to the accident, most of those from radiation are burns suffered while fighting the fire. Tragic as those steps were, they pale in comparison to the more than 5000 coal mining deaths that occur worldwide every year. No one has died of a radiation related incident in history of the U.S. civilian reactor program." (Moore, 2006, para 11) What we can take from this qoute is that the number of deaths caused by coal production and power is significantly larger than even the most significant nuclear disaster to date, showing that annually 5000 people to lose their lives from mining coal whereas a nuclear meltdown and explosion only caused only killed 56 people. This information just shows that nuclear power plants have safety as their primary focus even in the worst possible situation. In addition, according to Mark Schrope, "using nuclear power in place of fossil-fuel energy sources, such as coal, has prevented some 1.8 million air pollution-related deaths globally and could save millions more lives in the coming decades, concludes a study." (Shrope, 2013, para 1) Mark Shrope's article shows that because of nuclear powers lack of air pollution; carbon dioxide or greenhouse gas; has saved 1.8 million lives since it's existence. This is goes a show that nuclear power actually has the capability to save lives and help benefit society. Ultimately, the stigma associated with nuclear energy is out of place, with evidence presented nuclear power has far greater societal benefits than our primary means of producing power, as a result society would be a great benefactor of nuclear power.

Reduce cancer risks is it another societal benefit of nuclear power. To illustrate, according to a CNN article John sepulvado wrote states "The EPA has estimated the risk of people getting cancer around online and ash ponds were as high as 1 in 50 individuals exposed, slant notes. So, it's extremely important to lying these ponds. It's nine times higher than the risk of cancer from smoking a pack of cigarettes a day for your entire life. There are no regulations requiring liners at plant Scherer's coal ash pond ."(sepulvado, 2012, para 8) Important information to take from this is that living near coal power plants could be potentially life-threatening if exposed it could drastically increase a person or towns cancer risk and with no regulation on coal ash ponds; which could be prevalent; because it shows that each plant needs its individual regulation on the covering of coal ash ponds. This information just shows that coal power plants may be far more dangerous...

References: Disadvantages of nuclear energy. (n.d.). Conserve-energy-future. Retrieved April 21, 2014, from
Federal energy administration, u.s. department of energy. 2008, October 8. Renewing america’s nuclear power partnership for energy security and economic growth. Retrieved 2014, april 23, from
Greenpeace uk. n.d. Nuclear power-the problems. Retrieved 2014, april 23, from
Patrick, moore. (2006, April 16). Going nuclear. The Washington post. Retrieved april 19, 2014, from
Sepulvado, j. (2012, April 1). A power plant, cancer and a small towns fears. Cnn u.s. Retrieved, april 24, 2014, from
Supply of uranium. (2012). World nuclear association. Retrieved april 22, 2014, from
The economics of nuclear power. (2014). World nuclear association. Retrieved March 13, 2014, from
U.s. department of health and human services, national institutes of health, national cancer institute. (2011). National cancer institute factsheet: no excess mortality rate found in countries with nuclear facilities (nic publication no. 017-042-00276-1). Retrieved (april 22, 2014). , from
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Nuclear vs. Petroleum (Energy) Essay
  • nuclear power and solar power Essay
  • Essay on Nuclear Power and Hydroelectricity
  • Essay about characteristics of coking coal and use of agricultural waste for power generation
  • English: Nuclear Power and Students Research Paper
  • Should India Go Nuclear? Essay
  • Cow Power Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free