Preview

Nuclear Power

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1516 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nuclear Power
Since the end of the last century, the development of modern technology and science has played a significant role as measure to resolve energy crisis and global warming issues which resulted in life sustaining remedies and causes of mass destruction. However, many scientists agree that the earth’s fossil fuel supplies are dramatically depleting and this challenge will be a meaningful hurdle for future generations. Therefore, many countries may need to find new productive energy sources in order to tackle this problem. Many proponents of nuclear power suggest that the benefits of nuclear power could be capable of alleviating climate change crisis due to its cost-effective and capability to supply the world’s energy needs. In contrary, anti-nuclear experts may claim that nuclear power has an inadequate safety to be a general energy source owing to the radioactive waste and the possibility to be used indiscriminately as devastating weapons. This essay will argue that nuclear energy will not be a sustainable energy source of 21st century for three main reasons. These include high costs of generating nuclear power, health effects of radiation and long-term impact of radioactive waste on the environment and the public's concern about safety of using nuclear energy as well as comparing to renewable energy of solar power and wind power.

Since the end of the last century, human society entered into the age of large energy consumption.Total of energy consumption is foreseen to increase year by year due to an expansion of industrial revolution and population growth in the developing countries. As a result, nuclear power has become an efficient energy sources which is popular in many countries. In order to reach the balance between industrial development and environmental protection, governments have been provided responsibility to find new renewable energy sources to replace traditional fossil fuel. Many proponents of nuclear energy believe that nuclear power

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As a society grows and develops, there are many issues the people must face during the process. One of the most important problems modern civilizations must solve is where and how they get their energy. In our day and age, we rely heavily on fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas, and oil. Patrick Moore, a writer for the Washington Post, composes an argument for nuclear power and recommends that it should be the future for all things energy. Moore’s argument is a convincing article that would most likely pull many neutral readers to see his side very clearly. The article gives all the pros to the uses of nuclear energy, and does an excellent job of addressing all possible counter-arguments.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today's world where technology and advancements has flourished, majority comes to one main source to run on… Energy. There is several alternative methods on producing energy, some more efficient or safer than others. The most common and traditional source of energy in today's world is coal power, but other alternatives do exist such as that of natural gas, solar, wind, hydroelectric and nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is the 3rd most common source of our energy. Nuclear energy was first introduced in 1954 in Russia with the first power plant. Nuclear energy provides about 20% of today's electricity and does provide a substantial amount of energy, but does provide threats of radioactivity.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people think that nuclear power can provide low-cost energy which can easily substitute oil and the other common sources of energy. In addition to this, nuclear weapons are considered the only instrument which can make possible the maintenance of word peace. The nuclear problem is complex and difficult to analyze without any kind of prejudices. First of all, it is true that nuclear power can provide a huge amount of energy to every city in the world, but we also should consider…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Today nuclear power as an efficient and low consumption energy has been used widely, however, nuclear energy has potential and serious problems which people can not control.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientists have discovered countless energy sources, from fossil fuel combustion to nuclear fission and fusion, each of which have seemed to pose a different problem. Whether the problematic effect seems to be cost or carbon dioxide emission, renewable and nonrenewable resources have both seemed to come with a fair set of cons with their pros. Extensive research on the topic has shown that there seems to be no flawless source of energy extraction, however there certainly are sources that are relatively worse than others. This being said, nuclear energy, from the fusion and fission of radioactive elements, is one of the worst sources of energy because of its immense waste, danger to the general public, and large expenses.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many professors, scientists, researchers, and even governments, have been debating over the issue on the use of nuclear power as a main energy source. In Taking Sides, two authors who are highly narrow-minded state their debates on this critical issue. Allison MacFarlane, author of “Nuclear Power: Panacea for Future Energy Needs?”, believes that nuclear power should be revived. She argues that nuclear power will provide sufficient energy, while at the same time reducing carbon dioxide emissions. On the other hand, professor Kristin Shrader-Frechette, author of “Five Myths About Nuclear Energy”, argues that nuclear power is too expensive and unsafe for the environment, when there are renewable energy sources that are better for the environment and economy. I agree with Shrader-Frechette because she proves the five myths about nuclear energy wrong using extremely valid arguments, which exist to prove that nuclear power is not the best option for an energy source in our society.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Final Critical Assignment

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The main issue of the article is whether or not we should increasingly rely on nuclear power and make it our No1 source of energy given endless concerns about its safety and expensive cost. Undoubtedly, in a world of increasing population, diminishing natural resources and worsening climate change, nuclear energy is considered the key future energy resolution. In favor of greater reliance on nuclear energy, Mark Lynas – a climate-science author strongly brought in the reasons of: 1st, nuclear power avoiding climate change while fossil fuels have failed to do so and green energy capability is still being questioned; 2nd, opponents overstating danger even after many reactors has been safety improved; 3rd, the cost is acceptable comparing to other renewables energy. In contrast, Peter A.Bradford – former commissioner of the U.S.Nulear Regulatory Commission insisted in the alternatives, arguing that nuclear power is too costly to be pursued, not to mention its danger and potential severe impacts on people’s health. Obviously, the need of understanding the issue from comprehensive perspectives with substantial data support is essential to weigh the risks and benefits of each opinion.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the world, countries are leaning towards nuclear energy due to the amount of energy it can produce with very little resources. This topic is worth investigating since energy is basically a must, now in the 21st century. It is now considered an essential to have energy in our lives to maintain our standards of living. We have gone to many different sources of energy other than nuclear energy such as coal, solar, wind, oil and more, but many of those energy source have flaws too. Some sources of energy will reach the peak of their production due to resources and will eventually fall, others pollute the environment just like nuclear energy and some just don’t produce enough energy for us to fully rely on them. Many countries needed a new source of energy since…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although nuclear energy and power poses environmental and political threats, there are many very powerful positives in use of such a thing. Without the use of nuclear energy, our society…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The increased urgency to combat climate change has led to renewed interest in nuclear energy. To simplify a nuclear energy facility or a nuclear reactor is very much like any other power plant except that it produces heat through a process called nuclear fission. The heat produced from the nuclear fission is done through a radioactive element called uranium. The heat created is turned into steam which then powers a turbine, to generate electricity. This process is purported to be carbon emission free compared to traditional non-renewable energy sources such as coal; which is why some see it as an effective method to reduce carbon emissions by replacing our carbon heavy economy. However Nuclear power’s efficacy compared to renewable energy sources does not stand up to criticism. Allegations from the fission side are low cost (alleging that infrastructure and technology already exist for nuclear but not for renewables), as previously mentioned carbon free (alleging that life cycle studies of nuclear power plants compared to renewable energy sources is better for the environment), and a consistent source for energy (compared to renewables which are seen as non-intermittent energy source).…

    • 1758 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear power is a type of nuclear technology involving the controlled use of nuclear fission to release energy for work including propulsion, heat, and the generation of electricity. Nuclear energy is a clean, safe, reliable and competitive energy source. A small amount of matter creates a large amount of energy. A lot of energy is generated from a single power plant. Nuclear plants help regions meet air pollution standards and also reduce the cost of air pollution control for emitting facilities. As per the reports in 1998,it has been calculated the emission of the greenhouse gas has reduced for nearly half due to the popularity in the use of nuclear power. Of all energy sources, nuclear energy has perhaps the lowest impact on the environment especially in relation to kilowatts produced because nuclear plants do not emit harmful gases, require a relatively small area. Nuclear energy is an emission-free energy source because it does not burn anything to produce electricity. Nuclear power plants produce no green house gases. Nor does nuclear energy produce carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases suspected to cause global warming.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Power

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nuclear power is one of the most controversial energy sources in Canada and also throughout the world and is being talked about very frequently lately as to whether or not it is a safe alternative to other forms of energy such as coal or oil. In my opinion, energy from uranium (nuclear power) is a reasonable alternative to other forms of energy that come from non-renewable resources that are rapidly depleting. In the following essay I will enforce my opinion in the subject and attempt to convince you that nuclear power is an effective source of energy.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is stated that almost two billion people on this planet still live without the having to life enhancing energy services like heat and light. But it does not mean that we should start using dirty and harmful nuclear energy rather than safe and efficient renewable energy. Though it is true that renewable resources are difficult to extract but it also true and is proved fact that nuclear resources contain carbons which is harmful for the climate and if the world has to come up from this climatic crisis then renewable energy is the right tool.Moreover,solar energy,biomass,geothermal should be replace by the nuclear energy. This would not only help the world come out of the climatic crisis but also will help world come out of the poverty, widespread hunger and all other problems that the world has facing for years now. Moreover, Sailor.C argues that decarbonised fossil fuels can be used to lower the damaging effect of nuclear energy. But he mentions that this also requires a lot of capital. But if investment has to be done on decarbonised fossil fuels then why not to do the investment on the renewable energy which is far better and safe then the nuclear…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human beings have been using fossil fuels for hundreds of years, satisfying the demand of industrialization. The behavior of using fossil fuels, on the other hand, causes huge pollution, such as soil, water and atmosphere contamination. In addition, fossil fuels, such as solid, liquid and gas, are all facing on the exhaustion. It is evidential that the situations need to be checked or repressed. However, the solutions should satisfy the urgent requirement of energy as well. Nuclear and solar energy are two clean, practicable solutions for human beings. Because they have been tested and been put to use since the mid twentieth century. On the surface, nuclear and solar energy seem absolutely different in other aspects except for low direct pollution and practicability. In fact, they share some significant similarities while they are totally different in other aspects. This essay will concentrate on comparing and contrasting nuclear and solar energy by discussing the similarities in gas emissions, high expend in increasing efficiency and electricity price, and the differences in safety and equipments.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays