Nothing Impossible

Topics: Management, Scientific management, Frederick Winslow Taylor Pages: 14 (4869 words) Published: April 22, 2013
Management Introduction
Review of Management Articles
Article assigned
ANALYSING the thinking of F.W. Taylor using cognitive mapping Introduction
Scientific management is one of the three major branches within the classical approach to management. Although the concept was suggested approximately a century ago, it still makes a significantly important role in 21st century management with new conditions and a considerable number of challenges. Frederick Winslow Taylor who was regarded as the father of scientific management suggested his concepts in 1911. Scientific management is defined as a theory that emphasises careful selection and training of workers, and supervisory support (Taylor, 1911). Taylor (1911) believed that precise procedures that were developed after careful study of an individual at work should replace the tradition on decision-making. The purpose of this essay is to review three articles that analyses the Taylorism and present how Taylorism is applied in current management sphere. Analysis of Assigned Article

Cossette, P. 2002. Analysing the thinking of F.W. Taylor using cognitive mapping. Management Decision, 40 (2): 168-182 The author of this article used the cognitive map and the Decision Explorer to present and analyse the thinking of F.W.Taylor to produce a more in-depth and detailed knowledge and understanding of his ideas. Cossette (2002) demonstrated that the two key variables in Taylor’s scientific management were “Maintenance of a rapid pace…Loafing or soldiering” and “Harmonious relations between employers and men aware of their mutual interests”. As Taylor’s scientific management related to efficiency, the first concept that the author highlighted had completely reflected the Taylorism. Cossette (2002) concluded that “the maintenance of a rapid pace” was the most important concept for Taylor, since it was also by far the most important “consequence” of the cognitive map. Taylor’s scientific management was always considered as the division of labour pushed to its logical extreme, with a consequent de-skilling of the worker and dehumanisation of the workplace (Kanigel, 1999). However, the author showed another aspect of Taylor’s idea which was related to harmony. In cognitive map, the concept of “Harmonious relations between employers and men aware of their mutual interests” had the second largest number of direct links and the third centrality score compared to other concepts (Cossette, 2002). In addition, Cossette (2002) stated that “the prior conditions required to improve production and the results of this improvement for both employees and employers, are the two main dimensions that Taylor appears to use as a basis for his conception of the organization of work.” Although a small number of concepts from Taylorism were less relevant, they suggested that Taylor’s thinking was not significantly complicated. This article helped us have a better understanding of the ideas of F.W.Taylor, demonstrated the relative importance of the concepts suggested by Taylor and revealed another side of Taylorism. Analysis of Article 1

Wrege, C.D. & Hodgetts, R.M. 2000. Frederick W. Taylor’s 1899 pig iron observations: Examining fact, fiction and lessons for the new millennium. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (6): 1283-1291 However, the authors of this article were in dispute with Taylor in a particular circumstance. Wrege & Hodgetts (2000) stated that Taylor simplified the observation by presenting only some of the information and, he omitted many significant facts. The insight thinking of the authors was that contemporary organisation should apply new tools and techniques to achieve their objectives, and managers should increasingly concentrate on data collection and analysis and fight the tendency to accept anecdotes and hearsay as accurate (Wrege & Hodgetts, 2000). The authors studied and analysed the case called pig iron observation, which came from Taylor’s scientific management...

References: -3 points for not utilizing MG352 text to support term paper.
1. Operations Chief: OFTSSC Standard Operating Procedures, 2010
2. The Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) version 3, 2011
-3 points for improper citing of reference; below is how article from the Internet should be cited
Author (2012, May 15). Name of Article, Date retrieved from the internet &
-3 points for improper citing of reference; below is how article from the Internet should be cited
Author (2012, May 15). Name of Article, Date retrieved from the internet &
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • M. C. Escher: Only Those Who Attempt the Absurd Will Achieve the Impossible Essay
  • Film Trailer Comparison: Casino Royale and Mission Impossible II Research Paper
  • Nothing Comes from Nothing Essay
  • Much Ado About Nothing Essay
  • Much Ado About Nothing Essay
  • Review Much Ado About Nothing Essay
  • Much Ado About Nothing Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free