Northumbria University Newcastle Business School Nx315 – Professional Development Project
Part A.
Introduction
Part A of this report is analysis and justification my learning styles, preferences, indicate strength and weakness; and give methods for enhancement in lifelong learning. These will support the evidence to my future, career choice and my chose topic for discussion in Part B.
To make sense of how I learn, I have examined a number of investigations. The questionnaires used to conducting my preferred learning style are Belbin Team-Role Self-Perception Inventory, Myers Briggs Type Indicator and VARK. In addition I reinforce the implication by the Honey and Mumford Learning Style Questionnaire, Jung’s Typology Questionnaire and Howard Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences test.
This is meaningful because it tells where and who I am; and where I can go. Therefore I can determine strategies for each single component in my life, such as how to learn a new language or run a fund for life. Then I could give advice to myself, or to others.
Section 1
1.1 The best way for my learning
Overview and result
The first test I took was VARK Questionnaire “How do we learn best” (Appendix A1)
VARK can examine the one’s various styles in learning. It can be simple inventory for individual to intuitively understand and apply to practice. The test was introduced by Fleming (2001) and it based on the VAKOG Neuro Linguistic Programming, which was formulated by Bandler Richard and John Grinder (Tosey and Mathison, 2006).
Fisher stated that: when such tests are available we may discover whether a second sample is or is not significantly different from the first (1925). I realized that if I performed the test once in a time, it is not represent for test of significance. I took three tests, first on 17 October 2011; second on 30 October 2011; and third on 10 January 2012. The results of theVARK tested conducted, and the outcomes is tabulatedbelow and depicted in the Appendix A1. | 17/10/2011 | 30/10/2011 | 10/01/2012 | Visual (V) | 5 | 7 | 4 | Aural /
Introduction
Part A of this report is analysis and justification my learning styles, preferences, indicate strength and weakness; and give methods for enhancement in lifelong learning. These will support the evidence to my future, career choice and my chose topic for discussion in Part B.
To make sense of how I learn, I have examined a number of investigations. The questionnaires used to conducting my preferred learning style are Belbin Team-Role Self-Perception Inventory, Myers Briggs Type Indicator and VARK. In addition I reinforce the implication by the Honey and Mumford Learning Style Questionnaire, Jung’s Typology Questionnaire and Howard Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences test.
This is meaningful because it tells where and who I am; and where I can go. Therefore I can determine strategies for each single component in my life, such as how to learn a new language or run a fund for life. Then I could give advice to myself, or to others.
Section 1
1.1 The best way for my learning
Overview and result
The first test I took was VARK Questionnaire “How do we learn best” (Appendix A1)
VARK can examine the one’s various styles in learning. It can be simple inventory for individual to intuitively understand and apply to practice. The test was introduced by Fleming (2001) and it based on the VAKOG Neuro Linguistic Programming, which was formulated by Bandler Richard and John Grinder (Tosey and Mathison, 2006).
Fisher stated that: when such tests are available we may discover whether a second sample is or is not significantly different from the first (1925). I realized that if I performed the test once in a time, it is not represent for test of significance. I took three tests, first on 17 October 2011; second on 30 October 2011; and third on 10 January 2012. The results of theVARK tested conducted, and the outcomes is tabulatedbelow and depicted in the Appendix A1. | 17/10/2011 | 30/10/2011 | 10/01/2012 | Visual (V) | 5 | 7 | 4 | Aural /