Preview

nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
330 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
Obey At Any Cost

In the Milgram study “Obey at Any Cost” we focus on the elements of obedience in stressful times and see how it affects our judgment even if we have a moral code we live by. The experiment relies on the situation to influence people’s behavior, but how real is the situation? If it was you, surely you would understand on some level that this wasn’t real, that you weren’t really electrocuting someone, that knocking someone unconscious would not be allowed in a university study? Also, people pick up considerable nonverbal cues from each other. How good would the actors have to be in order to avoid giving away the fact they were actors? People are adept at playing along even with those situations they know in their heart-of-hearts to be fake. The more we find out about human psychology, the more we discover about the power of unconscious processes, both emotional and cognitive. These can have massive influences on our behavior without our awareness. Assuming people were not utterly convinced on an unconscious level that the experiment was for real, an alternative explanation is in order. Perhaps Milgram’s work really demonstrates the power of conformity. The pull we all feel to please the experimenter, to fit in with the situation, to do what is expected of us. While this is still a powerful interpretation from a brilliant experiment, it isn’t what Milgram was really looking for. Whether you believe the experiment shows what it purports to or not, there is no doubting that Milgram’s work was some of the most influential and impressive carried out in psychology. It is also an experiment very unlikely to be repeated nowadays because of modern ethical standards. Certainly when I first came across it, my view of human nature was changed irrevocably. Now, thinking critically, I’m not so sure but it prove it case throughout the experiment and I can agree with that.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At first Milgram believed that the idea of obedience under Hitler during the Third Reich was appalling. He was not satisfied believing that all humans were like this. Instead, he sought to prove that the obedience was in the German gene pool, not the human one. To test this, Milgram staged an artificial laboratory "dungeon" in which ordinary citizens, whom he hired at $4.50 for the experiment, would come down and be required to deliver an electric shock of increasing intensity to another individual for failing to answer a preset list of questions. Meyer describes the object of the experiment "is to find the shock level at which you disobey the experimenter and refuse to pull the switch" (Meyer 241). Here, the author is paving the way into your mind by introducing the idea of reluctance…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1963, Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted a series of social psychology experiments to study the conditions under which the people are obedient to authorities and personal conscience. The purpose of his experiment was to determine whether or not people were particularly obedient to the higher authority who instructed them to perform various acts even if they violate their own morals and ethics. It was one of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology as it has inspired other researchers to explore what makes people question authority and more importantly, what leads them to follow orders. There were several replications of his experiment and the results were identical to those reported by Milgram about how…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The aim of Milgram’s Study of Obedience (1963) was to investigate how far people would go in obeying an authority figure. He advertised in local newspapers. The ad was for participation in a study of learning at Yale University. Participants would be paid $4.50 just for turning up. Through the ads, Milgram had signed up 40 males between the ages of 20 to 50 with various occupations, and all came from a range of…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram found that most participants resented verbally but obeyed behaviourally and 65 per cent gave the learner the maximum shock of 450 volts even though the teacher was complaining after only 100 volts. Therefore this research shows that under certain circumstances some people are willing to go against their conscious. Also he found out the fact that people will obey when someone who is a dominance in a social hierarchy as they become liable to lose feelings of empathy and morality.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another explanation to why people obey being this idea of Gradual commitment, which has a snowball effect of starting of small and therefore making it easier to progress to something more extreme. If we look back at Milgram’s experiment, all participants were started at the same, relatively harmless, 15 volt shock. The shock levels gradually increased in increments of 15 volts and did not become painful or dangerous until several shocks had been administered. However, had participants been asked to deliver one large shock initially, it is less likely that they would have done so, but the method of gradually increasing bit by bit made the previously unthinkable seem like just another step. The idea of gradual commitment could perhaps be applied to the actions carried out my Nazi soldiers, they began small: name calling, minor violent attacks, more serious attacks, then it grew more serious: murder and mass extermination. However Milgram’s study lacks ecological validity and can therefore not be used definitively as explanations for real life situations.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Conformity and Obedience

    • 3322 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The following essay will be about understanding what is meant by and distinguishing the differences between the terms conformity and obedience. It will show the evaluation of two key psychological studies which seek to explain why people do and do not conform, also with explanations of minority influence. Whilst seeking to understand the reasons why people obey authority, it will show an evaluation of Milgram’s study of obedience, discussing the ethical issues raised from the research and assessing whether the knowledge gained about human behaviour justifies Milgram’s experiments.…

    • 3322 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram’s experiment was the first of its kind, seeing as how similar experiments were repeated afterward, and he wanted to prove that authority was a major part in why people listened to others. This experiment was started after a german soldier claimed he shouldn’t be prosecuted for torturing people during World War Two because he was ‘just following orders’. Of course, this experiment has been questioned over and over. Psychologists…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgram (1963) explains why 65% of the people did something they felt was morally wrong, that is they went into an agentic state and exhibited some aspects of denial in order to avoid moral strain. However, Milgram does not explain why 65% did not obey. In other words, it does not explain individual differences as the volunteers in Milgrams experiment seemed to resist the pressure and Milgram does not explain that.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    That theory is along the lines of that is how people are raised so they know no better. They assume that someone is in a position of authority for a reason and they will follow the orders handed down even if they conflict with their own moral views in some cases. It could also have to do with the fact that some people just have a deep hatred and anger in them and want to release it and use the cover of authority to do so. This is clearly visible in the movie A Few Good Men. The soldiers are taught to follow orders so they do not question Col. Jessep when he orders them to give a code red to P.F.C. Santiago. In the Milgram experiment it is possible to see how some people may have a deep aggression down inside as some were very willing to take it to the maximum of 450 volts and even continue after the learner went silent. All of these things come together to try to explain why people will follow the orders of authority so…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram and Zimbardo

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The study of obedience, conducted by Milgram, was to test how the subject would obey when ordered by the experimenter to adminater a shock to another human. Two experiments were conducted. The first used Yale undergraduates as subjects. The other used "ordinary" people as subjects. The results were shocking, both showed that around 60 percect of the subjects obeyed the experimenter completely. The subjects showed signs of distress throughtout the experiment, but continued because they were instructed to. These signs of distress indicate that the subjects knew what they were doing was wrong, but did the experiment anyways because they were ordered to so.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Darley’s criticism focuses on how the findings of the obedience experiments are applied to historical or real-world situations. He points out many ways in which the behavior of the obedience subjects in Milgram’s study differs drastically from the behavior of many others who commit atrocities: Nazi doctors or concentration camp executioners, for instance (Darley 133-134). However, since Darley’s criticism focuses on the behavioral differences between the obedience study and historical events, Milgram responds in a strong, convincing way. Referring to the process of comparing laboratory studies with real-world situations, Milgram writes, “The problem of generalizing from one to the other does not consist of point-for-point comparison between one and the other... but depends on whether one has reached a correct theoretical understanding of…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The experiment consisted of four standardised prompts, if they were unsuccessful then another two random prompts were added until the participant ended the experiment (Gibson, 2011). According to Holloway (2005), Milgram’s (1974) research attempted to theorise destructive obedience that revolved around the concept of a power related dualism of agency structure and the concept of an agentic state. Suggesting that obedience relied upon an individual entering a psychological state in which a loss of a sense of autonomy as a social being with their actions being controlled by some other agent (Reicher & Haslam, 2012). Conversely, experiments on deception in authoritative contexts conducted by Nissani (1990), argues that the human cognitive system has limitations, therefore individuals could not be relied upon to understand that an apparently benevolent authority is actually malevolent. Consequently, the fundamental reason for the participants behaviour could be conceptual and not the supposed capacity and abandonment of morals of an individual. Russell (2009) suggests that a state of autonomous denial should supersede Milgram’s (1974) concept of…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obedience is when someone does what a person or rule tells him or her to do. People tend to follow orders of an authority, and this can sometimes result in a negative effect. An example would include all those people who were obedient to Hitler, and killed innocent people in the Holocaust. For instance, Stanley Milgram, in his article, Perils of Obedience, writes about his experiment, of how people obey an authority, neglecting their conscience, and how this can be a threat to real life experiences. In contrast, another Psychologist, Diana Baumrind, in her article, "Review of Stanley Milgram's experiments on obedience," states that Milgram's experiment was unsuccessful for many reasons; and therefore, it is not valid. Both Psychologists have different views on the validity of the experiment and on how this experiment shows if people would obey an authority no matter what, in real life or not.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stanley Milgram Essay

    • 61 Words
    • 1 Page

    Stanley Milgram is one of the most prominent researchers that studied obedience in the field of Psychology. His experiment focused on the arising conflict between obeying an authority figure and personal conscience of an individual. The idea of the experiment was influenced by World War II, believing that soldiers kill other individuals because they are just following orders from their commanders.…

    • 61 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Saraswatichandra Vyas (Saras) is raised in Dubai by his evil step mother, and his strong-minded father. In spite of being treated unfairly, Saraswatichandra grows up to be a kind, intelligent and charming man. However, when his father decides to get him married, he refuses. However, his father still goes ahead with his agreement to Kumud Desai, a girl who hails from a wealthy family. When Saras hears of this, he sends a letter to Kumud, saying that he cannot marry her. But, Kumud replies to his letter saying that he has insulted her father and her family by first sending the agreement and then refusing it. She tells him that he has to come to Gujarat and break the agreement in front of her father. After some internal fights, Saras reaches Gujarat and is welcomed by the family in Ratnanagri. Only Kumud's sister and mother know the truth about Saras rejecting Kumud. Kumud doubts the honesty and reliability of Saras, even though she still has some feelings for him. As she is angry with Saras, she decides not to show her face to him (as Saras rejected her without seeing her face).Saras decides to reveal the fact that he broke his marriage plans to Kumud's father, Vidyachatur. However, he is constantly interrupted, which keeps the matter a secret to Vidyachatur but then Saras promises to see her face by the day of the kite festival and he sees her face, by seeing each other’s face they miss the kite were it goes and falls in a pond (the pond in which Saras's mom committed suicide) not knowing this, poor Kumud asks him to take the kite, where Saras by getting all the past memories of his mom tries to commit suicide who is truth and she tries to apologize to Saras who continuously refuses to accept her apologies. Meanwhile Kumud's sister Kumari(who doesn't know anything about the fight) shows a pencil sketch of Saras's eyes and she says that this was drawn by Kumud even before the again saved by Kumud's aunt. Kumud feels guilty when she comes to know about the marriage…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics