Preview

Nipping At Napster

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
357 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nipping At Napster
Some people think that it is perfectly fine to download music for free, but the majority of people know that it is illegal to do so. Joe Elliott works in the music industry and states “Napster is a form of theft. No doubt about it.” in a response to letter asking about how artist feel about it. Most people would argue and say that the artist do not care about how their music gets out because even with cutting the middleman out they still get their fair share of pay. The truth is most artist make their music thinking of their fans and try to use their platforms to influence people in a positive ways. It is nowhere near fair that artist are being robbed for their work when they try to help people express themselves through a feeling, a form of art like dance, or part of …show more content…
People also say that not everyone can afford music and it is free publicity. Yes it is true Janis Ian herself said “Most people can't afford to spend $15.99 to experiment”, but when people download music for free they are only listening and sharing music of those artists that are already extremely successful and established. In an article entitled “Nipping at Napster” it is stated that “Napster allows computer users to log into its site, download MP3 music files…. Completely free of charge.” Upcoming artist do not get the exposure that established artist do. There are people who are trying to influence with music cannot get an opportunity to share what they do. That means that there is less jobs in the industry because the same artist are getting recognition. If people give up on their dreams of becoming artist there is less culture being shared less expression of feelings and less jobs. In an article called cybercrime theft, downloading music freely goes against “The No Electronic Theft Act passed by Congress and signed by the president”. This Act was passed to prevent the recurrence of online theft yet it is still being

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    BIS 375 Final Exam

    • 612 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Since Napster encouraged peer-to-peer file sharing and did not actually publish music at its site, the courts ruled that Napster's operations were exempt from traditional copyright laws.…

    • 612 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Napster introduced a revolutionary change to the way music was distributed conventionally. Music companies worked with the artists to produce music. Thereafter they invested heavily into burning the music CD’s, marketing and advertising of the music and managing the distribution of the music to end customers via retailers. Retailers incurred staffing and real estate and costs. In contrast to this, Napster was able to bring together over 60 Million users who would share their collection of music to the remainder of the user base. In doing so, the reach and range of music distribution was significantly raised. Strong Community Feeling, word of mouth effect and High customer awareness led to low cost of marketing for Napster.…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Yes, I think the internet hurts more than helps artist. Before the Internet, artists were selling their CD’s and everything was fine. Since the Internet, many problems arrived. Ten years ago, the biggest record labels were worried about online piracy. Fearing piracy and seeing the fall in the CD sales, they decided to license their records to new online services. The idea was to use a new technology, share music while collecting small fees and discourage fans from stealing music online. But it didn't work as most of the listeners hear free music online because it is much cheaper than purchasing music. Nevertheless, many people (like myself) are aware of the fact that these artists make a living off their album so if they really like it they will decide to buy it on iTunes. I believe that some artist may have difference in opinion simply because they actually understand that not everyone will have $9.99 to purchase their album. Most of the artist that I listen to have a "rags to riches" story and can empathize with lower income individuals. I recently purchased some of the artist J. Cole's songs via iTunes and in one of his songs entitled "Note to Self" basically said, he did not care if only two people bought the album, he just felt proud of himself as an artist. It is not all about money to some (very few actually) of these artist. To that artist that is more after the money, I guess they would take the position that technology does in fact hinder them, however to someone like J. Cole, he would say. it has no barring.…

    • 278 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Advancements in today's technology have allowed users to access and use computer programs, movies, music and other multimedia for which they have not purchased. Technological advancements are coming along at such a quick pace that the enforcement of copyright laws cannot keep pace. Music piracy exploded in the late 1990's and caused groups such as the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) to crack down on companies such as Napster that provided that provided free music downloads. The number of lawsuits against individuals who illegally download music has escalated to the point that people are now switching to legal internet sites that sell music downloads. The ethicality of this issue has touched many people throughout the world…

    • 2646 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Two main recording artists Metallica and Dr. Dre have taken actions against Napster. They accused over three hundred thousand people on Napster for music piracy, which means they are stealing songs. There is a huge difference between sharing and stealing. All Napster did was to allow people share songs from one another. At some time somebody had to have bought that recording artists C.D., or it would not have ended up on the Napster network. People who have C.D. burners take it into their own hands to burn them. Burning songs from Napster onto your own C.D. is a copyright infringement, but Napster did not provide C.D. burners in their software the computers people own do. On Napster's web page, there is a warning about the copyright infringement laws. Recording artists feel they are being cheated, but record sales went up 2% since last…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think it is actually music piracy that is hurting the music recording industry. They need to take a stand on the situation to help prevent the loss of revenue to music theft. I still have the same stand point that if you wouldn’t still the physical copy of the CD from the music store. The, what makes you think it is okay to steal the digital copy of the CD online. The music is stolen either way, and the money is lost for the copy. I think piracy is going to continue to escalate as technology rapidly expands. That requires measures to be taken to help stop the theft of others music, art, or software.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The issue surrounding this problem arose when the Recording Industry Association of America claimed that Napster was basically giving out free music and was not paying the fees to issue "free" music. Napster claimed that all the music was shared among its users and were shared from computer to computer rather than a free website issuing free files for all to download. With the innovation of new technologies today, new problems will always come up due to better ways of getting things done. The same incident happened with the "new and improved" VCR. After fighting some battles, it was made legal for consumers to record from their own home and uses it for personal matters. Again, this situation is similar, but with more strings attached.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nowadays, better improved technology like, YouTube, iTunes, Spotify, Pandora, Abstract Radio, YouTube Music, and dozens of other services have free music. These services save people time. People can just click a button, instead of having to go all the way to the store, get the album, wait in line, pay for it, and go back home just to listen to their favorite hits. Also, the inexpensive music allows people to save money, which makes people value it more. Because the music is free, people value it more, because they are thankful that they can afford the music without having to worry if it passes their budget; it gives a sense of respect towards music. Unfortunately, not everyone agrees that music is valued…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ocho Cinco

    • 800 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Music used to be so simple. You listened to it on the radio for free, but you could not choose what was being played and there were lots of commercials. If you went to a concert, you paid. And if you bought a record, tape or CD, you paid. Every industry needs money to be sustainable and so does the record industry. The record industry has been around for decades and over the course of time it became more about money and less about art. People now days download music for free all the time on the web. They think to themselves,” should this be legal”? There is no simple answer to this question but most people believe that downloading music should be free.…

    • 800 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Steal This Mp3

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    With so many Internet users currently sharing music, The Recording Industry Association of America considers downloading music from websites stealing. Yet people who are downloading mp3 for free think it’s not because they are downloading shared copies of mp3’s. Companies like Sony sell computers with ripping and burning capabilities, MP3 players, and other devices that gain much of their appeal from music sharing. So what is theft? Treating customers like thieves is a certain recipe for failure.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Up on Downloading

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Elaine McArdle said, “The music industry is struggling with a full blown crisis”. What could possibly be pushing the music industry into a crisis one might ask, illegally downloading free music. In the essay, Up on Downloading, three Harvard Law School professors are trying to come up with different solutions to this problem that is occurring. Now that our technology has become so advanced, many people are figuring out ways to cheat the system, and when people are not paying for the music they have downloaded, the artist is not getting paid. Artists are not the only one losing money but everyone involved producing the music is losing money as well. There is also less and less people going out and buying CD’s. I could probably not even remember the last time I purchased a CD. So how are the artists and producers suppose to make money when we are stealing from them? Zittrain, Nesson, and Fisher believe they could possibly have the solution to save the music industry.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ruben on Piracy

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ruben acknowledges that piracy is against intellectual property rights but he contradicts his statement by saying it is okay to download popular singles from major record labels. By mentioning the latter, he is assuming that major record labels would not be greatly affected by piracy .It has been reported that the full impact of sound recording piracy on U.S. output was an overall loss of $12.501 billion (Stephen, 2007). As a major record label, it would be have a larger ratio of the market, thus the loss of revenue because of piracy is larger than the rest. Additionally, because of this loss of revenue, it leads to layoff and deprived the industry to develop new talent. Hence, he has not addressed the possible effects that downloading popular singles would lead to.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Music has been around for ages and has influenced multitudes of people culturally, socially, and economically. Music brings people together, and likewise can separate them. In the United States, music is easily accessible. With the technology we have today, music can be heard with the click of a button. Today, the internet has become greatly influential on how music is spread amongst people. The internet (e.g. streaming services online) is affecting the music industry in positive and negative ways with the amount of money or revenue being brought in. To listen to a song today, you don’t have to buy or download it. You simply stream it. (Woodruff, “Can the Music “) According to PBS’ Judy Woodruff, “that has led to a profound shift in the industry…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The process of being cool

    • 708 Words
    • 2 Pages

    People, who produce this music online, put in excess amounts of energy, time, and money while getting nothing in return. In source 4, the artist asks, “do you think about the days, weeks, months- maybe even years- that we have to put into writing, practicing, recording, mixing, and distributing that song?” The frustrations of being taken advantage of are evident in this source. Artists want to share their music but cannot be giving it away for free. This is their living and it would be impossible for them to make any profit if everyone is just took part in online piracy. When people participate in online piracy, they are stealing work that has taken many hours and much money to produce.…

    • 708 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Napster is a good example of how these intellectual property rights are being compromised on the Internet. Napster is a simple, yet sophisticated program created by a young college student named Shawn Fanning that enables users to anonymously swap and share audio files known as MP3s. During its infancy, Napster only had approximately 3,000 users. At that time, Napster could probably have been protected by the Audio Home Recording Act, "which gives consumers the right to create and transfer digital music for noncommercial purposes" (Gurly). Since that time, according to Chris Sherman, writer for the magazine Online, "Napster has become the most successful new Web technology ever by gaining more than 25 million registered users in just over a year or existence." At this point, however, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) is quite unhappy with Napster 's existence and its service. They believe "the fact that millions of users can share songs with one another is a violation of copyright and constitutes outright ‘theft ' of intellectual property" (Sherman). The RIAA won a lawsuit under this argument against Napster in early 2001, so the program may go offline unless a compromise is reached.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays