When forced to live under such conditions where there is no sight of normality, one such as Raskolnikov may begin to believe that because they are different from most of the society, they are allowed to disobey the law by means of reaching their needs and wants.…
Rasconikov’s isolated, detached, sneaky and disconnected side is when most of his intellectual scheming goes on. There is never any spontaneous moves when in this state, but more so every action being premeditated. This side of his personality is where he strategizes his theories about crime and how to commit it. Raskolnikov believes that the “extraordinary” are able to be independent, and not influenced by others on the outside, but only being influenced by oneself, being self-sufficient without company or the hand of another, which explains why his intellectual side is very isolated.…
Both characters reject ordinary standards and morals; good and evil are ambiguous, and they are pressured both socially and emotionally. “ … I am eking out my days in my corner, taunting myself with the bitter and entirely useless consolation that an intelligent man cannot seriously become anything; that only a fool can become something.” as indicated in this quote, the underground man believes that “an intelligent man” is incapable of becoming prominent. “Yes, sir, an intelligent nineteenth century man must be, is morally bound to be, an essentially characterless creature; and a man of character, a man of action-an essentially limited creature.”, the quote is an elaboration on the character’s previous statement; he defines “an intelligent man” that is contrary to the norm. Correspondingly, “‘The old woman was only an illness.... I was in a hurry to overstep.... I didn't kill a human being, but a principle!’”, as stated in the novel, Raskolnikov has a different moral perspective on humans too. Being a killer, to justify his actions, Raskolnikov considers his victim as “an illness” and “principle”; she was merely a human to him. They both possess distinct views on humans, contrasting the standard…
By the end of Dostoyesky's Crime and Punishment, the reader is no longer under the illusion of the possible existence of "extraordinary" men. For an open-minded reader, and even perhaps the closed-minded ones too, the book is a journey through Raskolnikov's proposed theory on crime. It is a theory based on the ideas that had "been printed and read a thousand times"(313) by both Hegel and Nietzsche. Hegel, a German philosopher, influenced Dostoyesky with his utilitarian emphasis on the ends rather than the means whereby a superman existed as one that stood above the ordinary man, but worked for the benefit of all mankind. Nietsche's more selfish philosophy focused on the rights to power which allowed one to act in a Hegelian manner. In committing his crime, Raskolnikov experienced the ultimate punishment as he realized that his existence was not that of the "extraordinary" man presented in his…
Raskolnikov is passing by a police officer and a student when he first hears the idea of murder for the unjustified reason of giving all to the poor. The student remarks, “Kill her take her money and with the help of it devote yourself to the service of humanity and the common good…of course she doesn’t deserve to live”(130;pt I;Ch.4). The people of higher knowledge plant a seed in Raskolnikov, if they believe this is true whats stoping him to not. They are respectable higher class and they have an influence on Raskolnikov's mind and his eventual murders. He respects their position and ideal based on first impressions which convince him to eventually make his…
Dostoevsky does not let the reader understand, until later on in the novel, that Raskolnikov had been thinking and planning out this evil for long period of time. Raskolnikov believes of himself be a sort of Napoleon figure in his community and that his action of murder will set people free from the suffering of their poor lives. But the opposite occurs, Raskolnikov does not become free from his suffering, he begins to face a fast descent into a psychotic break. Dostoevsky is trying to show the readers that you cannot combat suffering with sin and evil tendencies. Raskolnikov chose the easy way out; he chose to go against God and take matters into his own hands and ultimately suffers even more in his life because of…
Nietzche created what he believed to be the three nihilistic themes; epistemological failure, the value of destruction, and cosmic purposelessness. All of these ideas relate back to the main belief that once you strip away all the illusions of life, it turns out to being meaningless, and that those who continue to hang onto those illusions will be miserable. The theme that is most often related to 1800s nihilsm is the value of destruction. Especially in Russia, nihilists were related to violence and extremism. “Eventually the nihilists of the 1860s and ‘70s came to be regarded as disheveled, untidy, unruly, ragged men who rebelled against tradition and social order.” (Encyclopedia Britannica) they abandoned all social ties and believed that all evil is tied to ignorance, which could only be overcome by science. Those who became nihilists in this revolutionary time period, inspired and influenced many artists, philosophers, authors and poets. One of the most famous works that included and referenced nihlism in the 1800s was Ivan Turgenev’s novel Fathers and Sons (1862). Turgenev uses the main character, a doctor named Bazarov, to convey nihilistic ideas. In the novel, Barazov preaches of total and utter negation. Needless to say, the idea of nihilsm spoke to many individuals who felt they did not have a concrete place in…
Take the character of Rodion Romanovitch Raskolnikov as a lead example. In the famous novel Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov’s character completely alienates himself from society at points in time, and never shows sentiment to others and objects around him. His character is not one to care for how others feel; he cares for himself and his personal gain in the world. Raskolnikov’s climax in the novel crashes in as he commits the murders of Alyona and Lizaveta Ivanova. However, along with being a nihilist, Raskolnikov practices utilitarianism, so he believes that committing those murders will be justified in the end due to the fact that a thousand good deeds will come from that one tragedy. (Dostoevsky) Nonetheless, nihilism is found in real life as well as novels. Picture a wife, coming home from work early one day to find that her husband is in bed with another woman. The wife is at a point in her life where she will have to reevaluate the things most essential to her everyday life. Most likely, she will make the choice to leave her husband and begin a new life on her own. From her decision, she chose the most basic of needs, what nurtures and drains the springs of hope in her life. She chose to reject the objective truth, one of the basic principles of nihilism. Nihilism happens is found in many events through life, not just in the form of an atheist, but in examples of a wife leaving her husband, a man losing his job, a son leaving his abusive parents, and so on…
We first learn that Raskolnikov is the classic “college drop-out”, as we would define him in today’s terms. He lives in Petersburg, and lives a very small and uncomfortable life in a small garret. The first thing that we learn about Raskolnikov is that he is very secluded and absolutely crushed by poverty. He dreads meeting any one, especially his landlady. He is too embarrassed and broken to have any confidence to pull himself out of the small garret of his life, and into a new world of hope and prosperity. “He was hopelessly in debt…lost all desire to do so.” (1) I believe that this has the largest impact on his future perspective of situations, and especially his future thoughts and actions. He has already been changed by this, and this sets the stage for things to…
After Raskolnikov confesses to the murder of Alyona and Lizaveta, he is sentenced to eight-years in a prison camp in Siberia, where he is forced to perform hard labor. Despite his confession, he still has not repented for his actions and refuses to surrender his heart, body, and soul completely to God. Even now, he still believes he did not commit anything inherently wrong or sinful. At this point, nothing has really changed significantly other than his environment--simply, same old feelings, just a different place. Due to his pride, he is obsessed with the idea that he is superior and “extraordinary” (249).…
Raskolinikov is able to forgive himself easier once he has the time to reflect and serve his punishment. After committing the crime Raskolinikov eventually accepts that he must suffer the consequences, by law or by his own mental prowess; "If he has a conscience he will suffer for his mistake. That will be punishment - as well as the prison" (Dostoyevsky 230). The human brain dictates that all actions should have either a logical or emotional purpose, Raskolinikov struggles to find a good enough reason and his mind endures the penalty, until he is properly punished and serves out his sentence in Siberia with a quiet mind and a happy ending with Sonya to look forward…
In the book “Crime and Punishment”, Dostoevsky explores the path of Raskolnikov who has faced many difficulties and obstacles throughout his life. He commits murder and is faced with the long and extremely painful journey of seeking redemption. Raskolnikov believes that by the law of nature, men have been divided into two groups of “ordinary” and “extraordinary”.…
Guilt is a force in all that has the ability to bring people to insanity. When guilt becomes great enough, the effects it has on people go much deeper than the surface. People's minds and body's are overpowered by the guilt that consumes them every second they live with their burden. The devastating effects of guilt are portrayed vividly in Dostoevsky's fictional but all to real novel Crime and Punishment. In the story, the main character Raskolnikov commits a murder and suffers with the guilt throughout. Eventually his own guilt destroys himself and he is forced to confess. Through Raskolnikov, Dostoevsky bestows on the reader how guilt destroys Raskolnikov's physical and mental well being, which, in time, leads to complete alienation from society.…
Although it’s hard to know what he was like before the novel started, it can be inferred that he wasn’t always insane. Poverty and anger drove a man who used to be a hardworking university student to commit a murder and lose his sanity. From the opening of the book, his paranoia is evident. Raskolnikov seemed to have no other objective besides worrying about the thoughts of others. This paranoia is part of what makes him so impulsive. In many parts of the book, he allows his insanity to think for him. Raskolnikov’s dreams and hallucinations come after the paranoia and impulsiveness. They truly show how alone he is. The real-life connection between sanity and interaction with people is evident in Crime and Punishment. As Raskolnikov begins to talk to people again, his mental state gets better. His mind is at its worst when he is alone. If Raskolnikov had friends to rely on from the beginning, Crime and Punishment might have been a very different…
Ordinary people are the law-abiding citizens whereas supermen are not bound by any laws as they govern their lives based upon their own ideals. Raskolnikov’s believed the supermen must “sanction bloodshed in the name of conscience” (Dostoyevsky 229) and that great inventors and creators cannot submit to the laws that are meant for the ordinary. In order to achieve something new, the superman must defy the rules of law and commit crimes if he thinks it is necessary. He justifies all the murders he commits by regarding them as necessary for the greater good of the world that he lived in. By constructing the aforementioned theory, Raskolnikov established himself as a “superman” or above the ordinary people. He realized that “it was no longer possible for him to address these people” (Dostoyevsky 103) because his self-proclaimed and deceptive identity caused him to isolate himself from his society and gave rise to feelings of superiority over his peers. As seen in the case of Invisible Man, Raskolnikov becomes blind to those around him because he refuses to see past the theory that he has conjured in his mind. Eventually Raskolnikov’s blindness becomes an “agent through which [his] pride is chastened and his imaginative eye is opened to a more charitable and empathetic view of his fellow man” (Brothers). Consequently, Raskolnikov decides to later counter his theory and produces every effort to prove it wrong by realizing that he is in fact, not a…