Preview

Nihar, Sarah And Alex's Philosophies Of Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
795 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nihar, Sarah And Alex's Philosophies Of Government
Nihar, Sarah and Alex’s Philosophies of Government

What is the overall idea of this philosophy?

The overall idea of Marx’s philosophy is the working class deserves equality, freedom, basic needs and justice. If this is not provided for the general population, then they must revolt.

Machiavelli believed only one man should rule as a monarch chosen by divine right. This ruler should enforce order and protect the people. To enforce order, cruelty and deception are needed. The ruler is not obligated to do anything else.

What is the philosopher’s view of the nature of humanity? ( How much does he trust people in general?)

Machiavelli believes humans are stupid, easily deceived and need to be controlled. He had no trust in people stating
…show more content…
Without this hold, there would be no structure for society because the ordinary people don’t have the intellectual firepower to create laws.

Marx believes the purpose of the government is to spread wealth amongst all, fight against corruption and for equality, and provide the basic needs for life. The government should be controlled by the people.

Under this philosopher’s system, what could people do if they were unhappy with their ruler?

In Machiavelli’s system, the people could do nothing if they were unhappy with their ruler. The ruler would have total power over the people by inspiring fear and using lies to pacify the people.

On the other hand, in Marx’s system, the people could overthrow or rebel against the government and upper class if they were dissatisfied. If the rebellion succeeds, they could form a new, fair government.

Under this system, what is the balance between the people and the government? How much power do the people have?

In Machiavelli’s system, the monarch has all the power and the people have no power. In order to stay in power, the ruler can use dishonesty and cruelty to his
…show more content…
The government can be overthrown if the people aren’t satisfied with it.

Applying Philosopher’s Ideas

1. How would Machiavelli run BHS?

If Machiavelli ran Beaverton High School, Chuck would be appointed as the dictator. Teachers who don’t follow the standards would be fired. Students would have no choice on electives. Students arriving late to class, chewing gum or not turning in their homework would be whipped. Those who did not agree with the system would also be whipped. Machiavelli would not allow a school board.

If Marx ran BHS, teachers would be overthrown. Students would decide how to teach themselves. Hours would be more flexible. There would be no class restrictions. All school related issues would be voted on by the students.

2.Would would they say about closed campus and electives?

Machiavelli would agree to closed campus. There would be no choice of electives, Machiavelli would choose them for you.

Karl Marx would advocate for an open campus. No elective would be unavailable to a student. Even if the class is filled or the prerequisites haven’t been met.

3. What would Niccolo Machiavelli and Karl Marx say about the way this class is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Machiavelli, N. (2010). The qualities of the prince. In L. A. Jacobus (Ed.), A world of ideas: Essential readings for college writers (pp. 39-52). Boston, MA: Bedford/ St. Martin’s…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contrary to popular belief, Machiavelli is not a diabolic political figure in search of power. He is instead an astute politician who uses his extensive knowledge of politics to analyze various princes and principalities in order to educate future…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His writings are maddeningly and notoriously unsystematic, inconsistent and sometimes self-contradictory. He tends to appeal to experience and example in the place of rigorous logical analysis. Yet succeeding thinkers who more easily qualify as philosophers of the first rank did (and do) feel compelled to engage with his ideas, either to dispute them or to incorporate his insights into their own teachings. Machiavelli may have grazed at the fringes of philosophy, but the impact of his musings has been widespread and lasting. The terms “Machiavellian” or “Machiavellism” find regular purchase among philosophers concerned with a range of ethical, political, and psychological phenomena, even if Machiavelli did not invent “Machiavellism” and may not even have been a “Machiavellian” in the sense often ascribed to him.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Niccolỏ Machiavelli’s lifetime, Italy’s city-states were in turmoil, and he was extremely interested in the politics behind the chaos.1 Machiavelli advised principalities on the proper way to conduct themselves by using his study of human nature. His understanding of human greed, disloyalty, and predictability created a vision of politics that utilizes power for a prince to maintain stability. Machiavelli created power-politics, his vision of how to stabilize a principality, in The Prince.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Machiavelli’s The Prince, he tackles of issues in society and the government as a whole. Machiavelli believed a good ruler is one that could give justice and provide some type of order to his citizens. He believed that a good ruler should focus more on the present rather than what could be. Machiavelli used several examples to demonstrate his way of thinking in a humanistic way and running a government. He used the fox and the lion for an example. A good ruler should be able to use cunningness and brute force per situation in which it is called for. Machiavelli believes that there are two ways of fighting something, that is by law or by force and he believed those are…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his book The Prince, Machiavelli presents a theory asserting that man needs a powerful leader in order to be successful. Machiavelli felt that a Prince must act in a way that guaranteed stability and order. However, his emphasis on political convenience was not in the service of the individual power of a Prince, but in allowing that Prince to do what was necessary for the sake of the people. He argues that as a leader, one has the duty to be dishonest or otherwise deceive its people in times of need. This is further clarified when he addresses the question of whether it is better to be feared or loved.…

    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx and Engels wrote the Communist Manifesto to explain the history of class struggles in Europe and how communism was the ultimate form of government meant to bring equality to society and end the oppressive rule of the rising Bourgeoisie class. For Marx, humans are rational beings. But in a bourgeoisie capitalist dominated society, reality has become distorted and diminished a once functioning society. Industrialization has created a society of working class citizens who are manipulated, easily exploited, and oppressed for monetary gains. This is counterintuitive for the advancement of society and a successful government and brings about struggles of class. Therefore Marx argues the working class should be in control of government, because they are the ones ho keep the bourgeoisie rich and the economy running. “Formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat” (Marx 14). Marx argues the average working class citizens are capable of governing the land and distributing wealth evenly amongst the people. Writing is simply not enough he calls for revolution in order to restore peace and end the impoverishment of many…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli analyses the strengths and weaknesses of both auctorial governments and monarchal governments in his works The Prince and The Discourses. According to Machiavelli, governments, no matter what form they take, descend into corruption. Aristocracies become oligarchy’s, monarchies become tyrannous, etc. (Machiavelli, 111). Thus, Machiavelli states that the superlative governmental system is for all three forms of ‘good governments’ to be combined under one constitution. In this way, each form of government is better able to keep the others in check. However, Machiavelli favors the republican form of government over principalities because he believes it is better able to stave off corruption and is able to make better decisions.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    marx and carnegie

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages

    By eliminating the gap between rich and poor, Marx believes Communism should replace the economic system of Capitalism. In his perspective, he claims, “They have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Working men of all countries, unite” (Marx 476). Because he sees the Capitalist system exploits workers who are unfairly treated, he asserts that the proletarians should become the ruling class. The principle of Communism is the ideology of collectivism. Marx states, “Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society: all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labor of others by means of such appropriation” (470). This means that no private property should be allowed, and no one has even a less or more power in a Communist society. Because Marx illustrates the property ownership would enhance greed, and ambition to win in the…

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx supported the previous statement by introducing the idea of “dictatorship of the proletariat” in his book the “The Communist Manifesto”. He most probably used the word “dictatorship” to emphasize the absolute rule of only one class that will automatically destroy the other classes and therefore establish a classless society that would share the same values and interests. So as to achieve it, the bourgeoisie class needs to reach a state of “consciousness” that will free them from their desires of private property. In this way, the “dictatorship” is a form of rule that makes the government just a tool in the hands of the proletariat that is vital to free every person (regardless of class) from his needs and achieve self-satisfaction and self-fulfillment by working towards the common interests of the society, rather than an oppressive regime which suppresses personal freedom (Kolakowski 1978). Accordingly, Stalin is the framework of the Russian Communism in which center is placed the class of the Russian workers. He wanted to unite the people and destroy the differences in the society that resulted in social, economical and political conflicts: “organize the…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx in Soho

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In his Communist Manifesto, he spoke of a new social order that would eradicate the inequality of wealth among the people. He theorized that no one would possess anything more than the other. The rich would be forced to yield everything they had in excess to the poor. Poverty and starvation would no longer exist under this new social order. Karl Marx founded the ideal that after a revolutionary struggle, it would be a victory for the working class or the proletariat and a communist society…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Machiavelli's views have been misinterpreted since his book was first written, people take him in the wrong way, and are offended by what he says. Careless readers take him in a completely wrong way, such as they think that he believes that the end justifies the means, that a leader should lie to the people, and that a ruler has to rule with force. In actuality, Machiavelli means no such thing, he says that there are times when the common good outweighs the means, and the morality of a rulers actions. He also says that you cannot be loved by everyone, so try to be loved and feared at the same time, but of the two, choose to be feared. The Prince is considered to be one of the most important of nonfiction literature written in the history of mankind.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Communist Manifesto

    • 513 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the reading, the communist manifesto, Marx talks about ten main points on how to turn our society into a communist society. The first point that Marx makes I do not agree with. I think that his first point means that the government can come in and take someone’s land that they own. I don’t think that anyone should be able to just randomly decide that they get to take your property away from you. I do not agree with the second point he makes either. People who are not as wealthy as others already struggle to afford things that their family needs. If the taxes heavily increase it will make it that much harder on families who already struggle. Increasing taxes not only affects the people who are considered poor but it also affects everyone else as well. The third point that Marx states I also do not agree with. If you are supposed to receive something from inheritance then you should get it. When someone passes away and leaves particular things to someone their wishes should be honored. I both agree and disagree with the fourth point that he makes. If emigrants or rebels own land and they are doing illegal things on it or with it then I believe that the land should be able to be taken away. If they are using it for good purposes like to build shelter or grow food then I believe they should be able to keep it. Marx’s fifth point I don’t believe that it would be a good idea. With a single person running a big corporation like that could make any decision they want, which can be bad. When there is a group of people who own a corporation they have to take a vote on big decisions. I believe that Marx’s sixth point can be good and bad. The state paying for transportation can be a good thing, but what happens when they run out of money? I don’t think the state could afford to pay for so many people flying on planes, or any form of transportation like that. The seventh point Marx…

    • 513 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Karl Marx believed in order for humans to survive we have to work, and that people either own the property or you work for someone who does.…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays