Preview

Niccolo Machiavelli's 'Ends Justifying The Mean'

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
408 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Niccolo Machiavelli's 'Ends Justifying The Mean'
If one uses immoral ways to reach a goal, that goal becomes stigmatized by the ways used to reach it. Politician and philosopher Niccolo Machiavelli is known for coining the phrase, “Ends justifying the means” in his book The Prince. This quote leaves us with the question, “is it worth it to reach a goal no matter what you have to do to get there?” Machiavelli believed that wrong deeds can be justified simply by having a good purpose for those actions but his theory is flawed, because no matter the end goal one should not try to reach it through evil actions.
People are only to be excused if the means used to reach a certain objective are just as good as the outcome. There are many other ways to reach a goal through moral and pure actions. Greek Philosopher, Aristotle believed “Doing anything well requires virtue or excellence, and therefore living well
…show more content…
For Aristotle the process of being a saintly person(the means) are what defends the end as to what the moral person would do(the ends) so, for Aristotle “the ends don't justify the means, but instead the means justify

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Miles Unger offers an interesting take on Machiavelli in, Machiavelli: A Biography, written in 2011. Right off the bat, Unger’s Machiavelli regards priests as “charlatans and swindlers” Upon his death, a prominent church man described Machiavelli as “an enemy of the human race” with the Pope following suit several years in the future-a move that the anticlerical Machiavelli “might have taken as a backhanded compliment”. Unger argues that because Machiavelli’s works were placed in the Index of Prohibited Books, this give credence to the argument of Machiavellian atheism. Machiavelli’s goal in his writings encourages the hearkening back to the ancient writers such as Aristotle in an effort to bypass Christianity with paganism. Christianity proved too weak in the mind of Machiavelli, therefore something older and more violent needed to be used in order to stave off the corruption and attack on liberty that the Papacy brought. Although an excellent read, Unger offers little…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How would you explain Aristotle's main points in his Ethics to the average person: In Aristotles ethics he explains that we have to find out what makes something flourish or what makes something good at what it does. There are all sorts of examples that can be used but we will use a hammer as an example. What makes a hammer a good hammer, a hammer should not break when you use it to pound a nail into wood, it should not deform or bend when used, and if it is a good hammer you might get a life times use out of it. And Aristotle uses these kinds of examples to get people to understand what we are trying to figure out is what makes a good person. We know what makes a good hammer or other inanimate objects, but these are simply to easy to figure…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    to others when there is no gain to any other than ourselves. Your action of fight the…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However Aristotle then explains that a person should not act virtuously just to achieve a particular end because he believes this to be a subordinate aim. A person that acts in a way to achieve goodness Aristotle explains is a superior aim and it is these people that act ‘’good’’ because it is the right way to act not because they ought to. Following on from this Aristotle goes on to explain the key to goodness and virtue is to follow the ‘’golden mean’’. This is when as a person we act between two extreme vices for example the midpoint between shamelessness and shyness is modesty, this therefore is the golden mean. Aristotle also distinguished between two types of virtue, moral virtues and intellectual virtues. The first being those cultivated through habit whilst intellectual virtues are those cultivated through instruction. In the later twentieth century Virtue Ethics suffered a revival. It was questioned whether Aristotle’s teachings on Virtue Ethics had any weaknesses and some modern perspectives on Virtue Theory can be seen to highlight these flaws.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Flannery O'Connor Essay

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Most of us just rationalize our actions, justify our bad behavior, and label ourselves “good people”…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Palace Thief

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In today's world small ethical lapses can be seen everywhere. It is human nature to bend moral and ethical values to their own benefit and that can be seen in every aspect of life. For example, students who cheat on tests; in high school "everybody" does it, and for the most part, no one gets caught. Each incident on its own is not a big problem, but when compounded together, can create various problems for the student. If he or she had cheated on every exam given in the class, he or she will most likely fail their final examination because he or she gained no knowledge. Although these small lapses may not seem very significant, in the long run, they may have severe repercussions…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli: The Prince

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout my reading of Machiavelli, a particular selection struck me as very interesting. This comes from Chapter 17 when Machiavelli states, “Here a question arises: whether it is better to be loved than feared, or the reverse. The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being loved. . . . Love endures by a bond, which men, being scoundrels, may break whenever it serves their advantage to do so; but fear is supported by the dread of pain, which is ever present (Machiavelli 54). I believe this is an interesting question that would be a good topic for debate. Regarding this question, I side with Machiavelli on his reasoning that it is more beneficial to be feared then loved with regards to obedience. Examples of this principle can be seen in our world today. Laws demonstrate this very well. Laws are present to keep society in order, and with disobedience comes penalties. These penalties are what make people obey the law. Without penalties, or using the term pain in an exaggerated sense, most people would continue to break the law being aware that there are no consequences. Fear is what fuels laws to be effective.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle Ethics

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics provides a sensible account for what true moral virtue is and how one may go about attaining it. Aristotle covers many topics that help reach this conclusion. One of them being the idea of mean between the extremes. Although Aristotle provided a reliable account for many philosophers to follow, Rosalind Hursthouse along with many others finds lose ends and topics which can be easily misinterpreted in Aristotle's writing.…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social Responsibility

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Aristotle’s theory of morality, Nicomachean Ethics, he surmises that all human activities aim at some end or good. There are three types of good, sensual (pleasure), political (noble virtues for citizens), of life of thought (contemplation) (Arthur & Scalet, 2009, p. 51). He states “every scientific inquiry, and similarly every action and purpose may be said to aim at some good”. What he is saying is that everything has an end point which is something good. Everything we want to accomplish is for some good. The ends are many, and he goes on to say the end of the medical art I health, the end of the shipbuilding is a vessel, the end of strategy is victory, and the end of economics is wealth. One piece, to point out is Aristotle states there is a final end. For example some may think of money as an end, however, without something to purchase, money is meaningless. Working for example is an action not a goal, work is not the good, so what is the supreme end, what are you working to attain? “Perhaps happiness is the supreme good” (Arthur & Scalet, 2009, p. 52).…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My example would be a guy stealing from Walmart just for the heck of it because he doesn’t care about the theft laws in place. Stealing is considered a crime first of all and it isn’t morally right to do. Stealing is stealing no matter what, but there can be some good reason behind his motive for stealing in the first place. In this case, he obviously had no positive motive for stealing. If there was some kind of benefit than it could be deemed justifiable, but from what we know he just does it for satisfaction because he can get away with it and not get caught. There’s no way to justify his actions if he was sent to jail. In order for him to maintain possible ethical values, he has to learn to have good judgement, strong reasoning, courage,…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theories Of Virtue Ethics

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Aristotle’s first conclusion was partially justified through a consequential discovery—morality needs a goal (or one or more primary values). If nothing genuinely is consequential, then morality is baseless. If we optate mazuma just to make more mazuma, then the mazuma will never do any good. We require to spend the mazuma and utilize it for something worthy for its own sake. Most of our goals are nonmoral goals, such as our goal to make mazuma. Our goals are only virtuous when they lead to something genuinely good.” [ CITATION JWG10 \l 1033…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first idea, “the ends justify the means”, expresses a widely spread notion that in a materialistic world revolving around self-interest one must do whatever and sacrifice anything he needs in order to receive what he wants. Thus, morals and ethics are in some manner regarded as roadblocks to success, and success can only be achieved through trickery and deceit.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli: The Prince

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Page 71 What does Machiavelli say it is necessary for a Prince to do to "hold his own?"…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli and Morality

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When reading Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince, one can't help but grasp Machiavelli's argument that morality and politics can not exist in the same forum. However, when examining Machiavelli's various concepts in depth, one can conclude that perhaps his suggested violence and evil is fueled by a moral end of sorts. First and foremost, one must have the understanding that this book is aimed solely at the Prince or Emperor with the express purpose of aiding him in maintaining power. Therefore, it is essential to grasp his concepts of fortune and virtue. These two contrary concepts reflect the manner in which a Prince should govern while minimizing all chance and uncertainty. This kind of governing demands violence to be taken, however this is only done for the strict purpose of maintaining his throne, and generating both fear and admiration from his people. In all cases of violence, Machiavelli limits the amount of violence that needs to be taken down to the minimum, and most cases the victims of these acts are enemies of the people. Behind the violence, the prince is essentially taking the role of the villain and assuming all "bad" acts so that his people do not have to suffer and commit the acts themselves. In addition, all the Prince asks for is to not threaten his power and to respect it. In the 16th Century, this request is feeble compared to those of other hierarchical Monarchies. In the end, Machiavelli's Prince assumes all the burden of violence while leaving his noble people to act as they feel accordingly without worry of their lively hood. This is Machiavelli's ultimate stroke of morality.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    which will not be difficult, for all they ask is not to be oppressed… all else seek to win the populace over to his side. Which will be easy to do if he protects their interests” (Machiavelli 32). This an important point that every ruler should have into account if they want to have a loyal populace, it is in some way logical and realist: if a ruler stays in good terms with his people, then they will follow him; if this person is not on the side of the people, then why should the people should him?…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays