Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

New Jersey Plan vs. Virginia Plan

Good Essays
467 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
New Jersey Plan vs. Virginia Plan
In forming the constitution many rigorous negotiations took place in order for a prosperous government to take stride. It was hard to decide if the government should have a legislature based off of population or if each state should have an equal representation. Or should the legislature have two houses or one. There was so many choices and decision that know body knew what to do. The convention compared and contrasted the New Jersey Plan as well as the Virginia Plan and came up with the final solution, The Great Compromise
On May 29, 1787, Virginia delegate Edmund Randolph proposed what became known as "The Virginia Plan." Written primarily by fellow Virginian James Madison, this plan traced the broad outlines of what would become the U.S. Constitution: a national government consisting of three branches with checks and balances to prevent the abuse of power. In its amended form, this page of Madison's plan shows his ideas for a legislature. It describes 2 houses: one with members elected by the people for 3-year terms and the other composed of older leaders elected by the state legislatures for 7-year terms. Both would use population as a basis for dividing seats among the states. This plan allowed for a strong central government to take hold.
After two weeks of debating the Virginia Plan, a counterproposal was put forth by William Patterson, which has become known as the New Jersey Plan (or the Small State Plan or the Patterson Plan). Patterson's ideas amounted to no more than a simple reshaping of the Articles of Confederation. The New Jersey plan called for three branches of government; just like those of the Virginia Plan. Except in the New Jersey Plan the Legislative branch would have be unicameral (one house) in which all states would have an equal number of votes. This plan benefited the small states because of the states would be represented equally and no state would have more power over the other.
To solve the differences regarding representation (large states vs. small states) the Framers of the Constitution appointed a committee. The committee recommended a compromise, known as the Connecticut Compromise or the Great Compromise. The solution, supported by Benjamin Franklin contains three important parts: Congress would be a bicameral (two houses) legislature, with a Senate and a House of Representatives. In compromises each side gives a little in order to receive a little. The small states get the equal representation they desired in the Senate. The large states won control of the House of Representatives, which was given important powers related to taxing and spending. The Great Compromise of the Virginia Plan as well as the New Jersey Plan set stride for the American government in which we know of and live by today.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As you know, we are going through the Great Compromise. Congress cannot decide whether or not it is fair to adopt the New Jersey Plan, or the Virginia Plan. This compromise (An agreement with two sides or more, where every side gives up some of what they may want.) is one that potentially will shape the future government. You might be in between the two plans, but after you read this, you’ll know why you should choose the New Jersey Plan. This plan is about having an organized government, and the ideas on what the Congress should have the power to do.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Great Compromise”: provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Virginia Plan stood on the claim of expanding national power over the states and to have representation to states based on their amount of population. One of the delegates whom were for a stronger national government had mentioned the new country was ready for tyranny. I believe that the thought of having a country under tyranny is dangerous and feeding the national government too much power, especially since the states have already suffered under the harsh rule of tyrant leader, King George III.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before we knew it as the United States Constitution, we all knew it as the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was just too weak as in: each state had one vote in Congress, there was no executive branch to enforce laws passed by Congress, there was no national court system, and etc… Before it could be ratified there was great concern between the delegates that were present at the convention. The main concern they had was the type of legislature. The representatives of larger states wanted the seats in the legislature to be determined by the size of the state. The representatives from the smaller states wanted to have equal representation in Congress. They negotiated on this situation by allowing a bicameral legislature,…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without the decisions the government made together we would've never came into an equal equality, without solving the world’s biggest problems. In the summer of 1787 , fifty five delegates representing twelve of the thirteen states met in philadelphia to fix the national gov’t. The problem was that the government under the articles of confederation, the challenge was to create a strong central government without letting anyone get too much power. How did the Constitution Guard against Tyranny? In further reading you will see how they divided the powers that were given to them to help the nation and states around the world, that fills up the world’s problems.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitution. Paterson delivered the New Jersey Plan with his concern of the voices of smaller states would be drawn out of larger states if the Virginia Plan been approved (Abraham Messler, 1954). His plan was particularly in response to the Virginia Plan, which in favor of proportional representation and a bicameral legislature( Leonard Williams Levy, 2000). The New Jersey Plan supported each state has one vote regardless of their population and the unicameral legislature. The with the final decision had come after their intense debate, that was the rejection of the New Jersey Plan, and the main reason was because it was too concentrated on gain more power to small states rather than the…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    UNIT III APUSH STUDY GUIDE

    • 3331 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Virginia delegate James Madison's plan of government, in which states got a number of representatives in Congress based on their population…

    • 3331 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States of America was going through a time of great debates and dilemma’s. It became obvious that a better more powerful national government was necessary. The Articles of Confederation was weak and needed to be replaced. While this was occurring a major problem developed. This was between large states, which vied for legislature segmented by population, and smaller states which wanted the system to have equal portioned votes everywhere. The larger states suggested the Virginia Plan, and the small states proposed the New Jersey Plan. At first, this issue was at a stalemate and both sides refused to give up ground. Eventually, Oliver Ellsworth offered The Great Compromise. This called for a bicameral Legislature with proportional…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of these is the Virginia Plan, also called the Large State Plan, which advised that the representation in a bicameral legislature be proportional to property or population. The other is the New Jersey Plan, which called for equal representation for all states regardless to population in a unicameral legislature. Had the Virginia Plan been adopted entirely, large states would always have a dominant voice over the smaller states. On the other hand, if the New Jersey plan had been adopted entirely, bigger states with bigger needs would never prevail. When the delegates began to discuss this issue, they willingly agreed that a bicameral legislature is necessary for the new national government. They differed widely, however, in the representation of the two houses. Bitter debates followed until, finally, the compromise of equal representation in the House and proportional representation in the Senate was reached. In Henry Steele Commager 's article, "The Constitution, Was It an Economic Document?", he remarked that the framers "feared the powers of the majority, as they feared all power unless controlled" (141); the compromise of the representation of the houses underscores exactly this point because it prevents an absolute body majority which would prove to be fatal to the country had they had a malevolent intent. Furthermore, the compromise effectively appealed to all states and therefore…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Virginia Plan states that the “Legislative Executive and Judiciary powers within the several States ought to be bound by oath to support the articles of Union”. Furthermore the Virginia Plan calls for the negative on all laws of the state. Upon reading such parts of the Virginia Plan, one might think that the Virginia Plan gives too much power to the national government, limiting the individual state’s power greatly. Indeed, delegates against a stronger national government such as George Clinton feared that it will threaten the economic success of individual States and will lead to the abuses of power experienced under the British rule. However, after a careful analysis of the history and reason behind the Virginia Plan, one will understand that this is not the case.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve years after declaring independence, the American people were struggling to articulate their vision for government. They were acutely aware of the shortcomings of a weak central government under the Articles of Confederation, yet they still felt strongly that the individual states maintain their power. James Madison drafted the Virginia Plan in 1787, with a goal of stabilizing the budding nation by according more authority to a central government than before. These resolutions would ultimately become a new Constitution. It was in January 1788, after five states had ratified but eight were still skeptical, that Madison penned a letter to the Independent Journal, wherein he detailed his rationale for the larger federal government.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    virginia plan

    • 347 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Constitutional Convention gathered in Philadelphia to revise and enlarge the Articles of Confederation. The scope of the resolutions, going with the Articles of Confederation broadening the debate to encompass fundamental revisions to the structure and powers of the national government. One issue facing the convention was whether large and small states would be represented in the legislature, by equal representation for each state, besides of its size and population or proportionate to population, with larger states having more votes than less populated states. Under the Articles of Confederation, each state was represented in Congress by one vote.…

    • 347 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States of America went through a time where people changed the way they lived and so the government was forced to rearrange their laws. After their independence from Britain, childish America desperately needed a form of government and guidelines on how to rule separate states. The difficult task on trying to bring them together as one was the federal government. As a quick solution to their progress, our founding fathers united to what is known as the Second Continental Congress developed. This congress was presented by John Hancock who replaced the Peyton Randolph. It was time for Colonies to seek for peace. All the nations got news that all the colonial leaders meet more often. In this time John Adams established a plan in which…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Madison, the Father of the Constitution himself, divulged the Virginia Plan. He wanted to have a two house legislature. He also wanted the president to be elected by Congress. This plan favored bigger states because they would, according to their population, get more representation in the government.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Compromise

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Virginia Plan was written by James Madison, but presented by Edmund Randolph. This Plan was presented to the Constitutional Congress on May 29, 1787. The Virginia Plan proposed the three branches in America. The legislative, judicial, and executive branch. The role of this document is very important and strong. It was the first document to produce a separation of powers in different branches. The Virginia Plan when through more than one revision before it was finally done. There were two houses throughout this plan. The House and the Senate. One of them with members elected from…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays