New England VS Chesapeake
Although New England and the Chesapeake regions were both settled largely by people of English origin, by 1700 the regions had evolved into two distinct societies. Why did this difference in development occur?
Since Columbus discovered America, people from Europe were avid to lunch there to explore the New World. Most people went there for religion purposes and money, but as they set up their own regions, they governed their lands in different ways. Specifically, New England and Chesapeake, which were both held by English people, grew in contrastive way because of the difference in three aspects. People going to New England developed their state in a different way compared to Chesapeake because they had distinctive goal. After the Church of England was set up, a group of people who seized faster changes in the religion, known as Puritans, was harassed to the Holland. Being afraid of becoming Dutch, Puritans gambled their future lives in a completely new and distinctive world. They went to America to seek chance spreading their idea of religious freedom. At the meantime, they wanted to remain their free and enlightened essence. So since they started to develop, Puritans focused especially on these two goals. People went to Chesapeake, however, were sent there by the Virginia Company. Aimed to money, they were eager to find gold and a passage to Indies. Therefore, nothing else such as government or community would play a more important role in those minds. The difference in the purposes of these journeys also resulted into the differences in further development. The economic style was also different between New England and Chesapeake. Because of the cold weather, New England settlers focused on fishing and ship building instead of traditional agriculture. Since they did not demand much labor, New England became the last part of the 13 regions receiving African Americans as slaves. This was different for settlers in the Chesapeake regions.
Since Columbus discovered America, people from Europe were avid to lunch there to explore the New World. Most people went there for religion purposes and money, but as they set up their own regions, they governed their lands in different ways. Specifically, New England and Chesapeake, which were both held by English people, grew in contrastive way because of the difference in three aspects. People going to New England developed their state in a different way compared to Chesapeake because they had distinctive goal. After the Church of England was set up, a group of people who seized faster changes in the religion, known as Puritans, was harassed to the Holland. Being afraid of becoming Dutch, Puritans gambled their future lives in a completely new and distinctive world. They went to America to seek chance spreading their idea of religious freedom. At the meantime, they wanted to remain their free and enlightened essence. So since they started to develop, Puritans focused especially on these two goals. People went to Chesapeake, however, were sent there by the Virginia Company. Aimed to money, they were eager to find gold and a passage to Indies. Therefore, nothing else such as government or community would play a more important role in those minds. The difference in the purposes of these journeys also resulted into the differences in further development. The economic style was also different between New England and Chesapeake. Because of the cold weather, New England settlers focused on fishing and ship building instead of traditional agriculture. Since they did not demand much labor, New England became the last part of the 13 regions receiving African Americans as slaves. This was different for settlers in the Chesapeake regions.