Neville Chamberlain's Policy of Appeasement between 1937-1939

Best Essays
‘As a strategy it was foolish, complacent, ill-informed and ultimately disastrous.’ How valid is this assessment of Neville Chamberlain’s policy of appeasement between 1937-1939?
The policy of appeasement is arguably one of the most contentious of our time; views on appeasement vary, but in some way appeasement can be defined as reconciling or even acquiring peace by the means of concessions or gifts. In terms of appeasement in politics, it is the settlement of international quarrels by satisfying grievances through ‘rational’ negotiation and ‘compromise’ in order to avoid conflict. Prior to Chamberlain’s use of appeasement the word did not have a negative connotation, but due to the nature of the result of Chamberlain’s policy the word has brought along with it the idea of weakness, cowardice and self-deception which often may not be the case. When analysing Neville Chamberlain’s usage of appeasement we must decipher and take into account a number of things, the first being Britain itself, the economic and political state of the country, the voice of the people and the Briton’s views of Germany, Hitler and Nazis; we must explore the pressures that were on Chamberlain’s shoulders and where he stood with Hitler, his beliefs regarding Appeasement and the intentions behind his decisions and identify the prior relationships between the countries involved.
The Orthodox view that Chamberlain’s policy was foolish and ill-informed came into the limelight during and immediately after the war started, as people could now see the failure of appeasement. From 1939-1960s criticism of appeasement became immense; historians argue that Chamberlain gave into Hitler’s demands far too easily and that he gave in out of fear and to avoid a war. Source A1 is from the book “Guilty Men” which refers to appeasement as "deliberate surrender of small nations in the face of Hitler's blatant bullying". Unlike Hitler, Chamberlain attempted to create peace from the very beginning, he said "We

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    and France chose the path of appeasement in hopes that this would satisfy Hitler and not drag Europe into another world war. Appeasement came from the desire to make amends and prevent war at all costs. Appeasement seemed to be working for small problems but when applied to choices like the fate of a country, appeasement caused more problems than it solved. Events in Europe and Britain between 1989-1939 pressured Chamberlain into abandoning his policies for appeasement. Events in Europe pressured…

    • 867 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    of bombings by the German between September 7th 1940 to May 1941. The attacks were collectively known as the Blitz, which reportedly claimed the lives of 20,000 civilians in London and destroyed more than a million houses. I believe London was prepared for the onset of the Second World War and in this essay I will state my reasons and contemplations. Firstly, the mass evacuation was considered as one of the successes of Neville Chamberlain’s…

    • 3178 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chamberlain’s Fight for Peace In 1274 BC there was a battle called the Battle of Kadesh, this battle was for Egyptian peace. The battle was between the New Kingdom of Egypt and the Hittite Empire; the Hittite Empire was a large and strong army compared to Egyptian army. The Egyptian army did not prepare for a battle but for an agreement. In 1938 Neville Chamberlain was the Egypt, he went to make peace but got a killing of innocent people. Neville Chamberlain with all of his success…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeasement Policy

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Appeasement was the policy followed by the British, and later by the French, of avoiding war with aggressive powers such as Japan, Italy and Germany, by giving way to their demands, provided they were not too unreasonable. There were two distinct phases of appeasement. From the mid-1920s until 1937, there was a vague feeling that war must be avoided at all cost, and Britain and sometimes France drifted along, accepting the various acts of aggression and breaches of Versailles. When Neville Chamberlain…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Policy of Appeasement

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How far was Britain having no allies the reason why the British government adopted a policy of appeasement? By the mid 1930’s the government was concerned about growing fascist power in Germany and Italy. Having no allies was very anti-war and that was one influence on the government when they adopted the policy of appeasement. It was also felt that the Paris Peace Settlement was too harsh and a policy of appeasement would allow for revision of the harsher parts of the treaty. Britain also had Economic…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain gave this speech to the House of Commons on September 1st, 1939, hours after Hitler's troops had invaded Poland. Chamberlain and others had spent years negotiating with Hitler in order to prevent another war in Europe. The point of this speech is too inform people of what Hitler has done and of what the British response will be. In the beginning of his speech, Neville Chamberlain reminds you of his qualifications and actions as leader by stating, “Eighteen…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    and France adopted the Appeasement Policy towards the Axis powers, which included Germany, Italy and Japan. This policy originally aimed at preventing wars. However, it turned out in encouraging the Axis powers to demand more territories. Appeasement policy is a kind of diplomatic policy, which granted concessions to the aggressive powers by satisfying their demands with the belief that the aggressive powers would be satisfied and stop to cause troubles. Appeasement policy aims to maintain stability…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Appeasement

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages

    was the policy of appeasement the most important factor in causing the Second World War? Appeasement is defined as the diplomatic policy used in the attempt at making centrally political compromises to an authoritarian power/powers in order to evade the possibility of a conflict. This policy was followed predominantly by Britain in the 1930s in their efforts to settle global disputes by resolving grievances through cooperation and conciliation. One of the most famous examples of this policy is the…

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeasement was the policy adopted by the British and French prime ministers in 1930s towards Germany. The aim of which was to settle international quarrels by satisfying Germany’s grievances, thereby avoid the resort to war which in other words, maintain peace. There are several reasons to why the appeasement policy was adopted. Such as, Britain and France were both suffering from economic depression and thus felt that they could not afford to spend a large expenditure on arms to combat Germany…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ‘British opposition to the policy of appeasing Germany increased between 1937 and 1939.’ To what extent do you agree with this opinion? British Opposition to the policy of appeasing Germany increased significantly post 1937. The sources as a whole establish an increase Public Opinion against the Appeasement of Germany although during different time periods and events. Source one concentrates on the effect of the Spanish Civil War and how the left becoming ‘war minded’ took affect on Britain.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays