Preview

Net Neutrality

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
297 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Net Neutrality
Net Neutrality Net Neutrality is the principle that Internet service providers or ISPs should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source, and without favoring or blocking particular products or websites. What this means is that everything on the Internet would be equal and that all access would be available to anyone. The question is whether having access to all that information would turn out to be a good thing or a bad thing not only for the present, but for the future. Not all people need access to all the information that is on the Internet. I don’t think it is necessary for regular Internet users to have to see private information of some companies. Still, there is no reason why they shouldn’t have the ability to do so if they wish. Also, no website should be able to be faster than another site. This would make users more likely to use the websites that the ISPs make faster. In a way, the Internet service providers would have the ability to choose the websites that are and aren’t popular with the regular user. That is why they should not be able to favor or block anything on the Internet. Even though most people have no need to have access to many sites on the Internet, they should always have the ability to do so. There should also never be any favoring or blocking by the Internet service providers because that would give them the ability to make some websites popular and make other sires unpopular with the average Internet user. If we have access to all information and all websites are equal then and only then will the Internet be totally equal. For all these reasons I support Net Neutrality.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    We’ve spent a lot of time here at TLF talking about the sound economic arguments against net neutrality regulation. We argue that net neutrality regulation will result in worse consequences than leaving the internet relatively unregulated. But to me, the more important point is that net neutrality regulation is itself unjust.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Additionally, under the FCC rein of control those against Net Neutrality argue that by letting the FCC create harmless rules will eventually backfire, if future overseers may expand their authority, and create stricter regulations for Internet providers. As a result, Broadband providers could begin a lengthy court battle, which will result in jobs lost and cause them to not try to improve their networks thus stifling technological growth. Additionally many argue that net neutrality protects innovation, because big business such as Netflix, Google and Hulu could pay to pay for more bandwidth and faster speed than, smaller than websites run by small companies, government funded websites, non-profit, and start-up companies. The ability to pay for faster broadband speed could result in smaller companies being considerably…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jrlc Chapter 2 Pt. 1

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I believe that eventually some form of net neutrality will have to be put in place to prevent censorship or any restrictions of content based on person-to-person or amount of money being paid for service.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Lin Ray, net neutrality means no bit of information should be prioritized over another (“VCU Blog”, 2014). The origin of information doesn’t matter. Due to net neutrality, there are no restrictions on the internet currently. In other words, we can have free communication. The entire source of the internet is freely available for normal web users. Losing the freedom of internet access could result in restricted access to websites; fewer download rights and so on. The topic of net neutrality has become controversial because several companies are trying to take away the freedom of internet access.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Abolishing Net Neutrality Was a Bad Idea With the recent abolishment of net neutrality, an enormous discourse has risen about the legality and ethics of the abolishment of the Obama-era law. Although many argue that net neutrality is not useful for the United States, I think that net neutrality is needed in the interest of citizens. It preserves the internet as a public good and brings important economic benefits. While the opponents of net neutrality argue that the abolishing it will help the economy by reducing investment, I contend that preserving net neutrality allows the internet to be useful to more people and reduces the government’s over-controlling grip over us.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Net Neutrality is the ability for all information transferred over the internet to be treated equally (Abbruzzese). Net neutrality protects consumers from there Internet service providers to abolish and limit basic rights of the internet. Net neutrality protects these companies…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Net neutrality is the idea that all content on the internet should be treated equally (Schewick, 2009). This means that ISP’s cannot discriminate against content by slowing down content they do not agree with or charging internet companies more to have certain content delivered faster (Schewick, 2009). Net neutrality has been the unspoken standard since the creation of the internet. This is because, when the internet was first created, ISP’s did not have the technology to determine which content was going through their network (Schewick, 2009). Since then, technology has improved and ISP’s now have the ability to determine which content is going through their network and effect its delivery to the end user (Schewick, 2009).…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A writer for Wired, a technology focused magazine and website, even states, “Net neutrality is a dead man walking. The execution date isn’t set, but it could be days, or months (at best)” (Ammori). This is assumed quite a bit in part because the court systems that struck down the original FCC rules seems to be heavily in favor of corporations over the public interest. It also doesn’t help that ISPs are currently offering a false compromise with the FCC. The current rules that the FCC is voting on would allow the FCC to tell ISPs that they are not allowed to block sites entire for no reason, but they would be allowed to throttle any website for any reason of their choosing. This is very worrying, because as Marvin Ammori put it, “Once the court voids the nondiscrimination rule, AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast will be able to deliver some sites and services more quickly and reliably than others for any reason. Whim. Envy. Ignorance. Competition. Vengeance. Whatever. Or, no reason at all.” If our internet is controlled by the decisions of corporations we are in for a bleak future. Websites like Wikipedia, which provide a wealth of free information, would have trouble being able to provide their services to the public for free as they would be facing a set of fees assessed by each ISP based off of the amount of users that access their website. Free sites that share information with people…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The internet has already changed the way that the world operates today. Presently, everyone has access to the internet everywhere in the world. The internet is used through a variety of purposes, from academia research to business transactions and contacting family. Considering the freedom that the internet provides us, a group of people threatens that freedom of access to the Internet by conflicting with the Net Neutrality. Analyzing this issue from a deontological versus a utilitarian point of view, this paper will show why it is important to keep all the users equal in the Internet. Before we start, we must understand that ethic is all in a matter of perspectives. The interest of the user and content providers versus the interest of the telecommunication companies are different making their priorities opposite. This paper will taking this issue from the viewpoint of the end users of the Internet, not the viewpoint of corporations and Telecommunications Company. We will first discuss deontological views on restrict network neutrality, then utilitarian’s view on open network neutrality comparing it to our present-day applications to prove why utilitarian is a better solution for the present day internet.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Killswitch Documentary

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Internet has become a popular source of mainstream media. A battle is raging over the control of the Internet, and the rights of the American people are at stake. The documentary Killswitch, exposes the true power of the Internet and how the government is controlling that power; violating freedom of speech and the right to privacy. The documentary takes a stand in favor of Net Neutrality, which is the principle that the Internet enables access to all-content without choosing or blocking certain websites. The efforts of Aaron Swartz and Edward Snowden to win back Internet freedom are highlighted in this documentary in order to appeal to American citizens to take action in favor of Net Neutrality. “Freedom is embedded in technology and we have to protect technology if we want to protect our freedom” (Killswitch). Internet regulation grants power to the Government and violates constitutional rights of Americans hindering the Nation’s founding principle of democracy.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Health

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is for you to:1. become familiar with Net Neutrality.2. identify the impact of Net Neutrality on your daily life and use of the Internet.3. identify why people are for it and others oppose it.4. formulate your own opinion about Net Neutrality.Directions: Follow the step-by-step instructions and use Microsoft Word to respond to the questions below. Your response to questions one, two, and three should collectively be no less than 200 words (The word count excludes the text for the questions). All answers must be original – NO copy and pasting from websites! Also, you must also include in-text citations and cite any sources on a reference page using proper MLA or APA format.Complete a word count and post it on the bottom of the document. Be sure to indicate your name and date at the top of the document.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On certain sites, there could be options to pay extra for a _ÑÒfast lane,_Ñù a faster internet for extra payment. Without the current regulations, ISPs could manipulate us online. They could control what we can and can_Ñét see, and they could manipulate…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Net Neutrality

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Service Providers argue that the quality of service should be a tiered style, meaning you would pay more for higher level of service. Additionally, they say government regulations which enforce network neutrality limit their business models and diminish their incentive to create faster networks. The opposition reject this argument stating that faster internet doesn’t necessarily mean better for all, the utilitarian way. For instance, the wealthy will be pushed to the front and the average joe six pack could be limited due to lack of funds.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In 2001, the International Telecommunication Union calculated that, approximately 2.3 billion people had internet access at the end of that year. Since then, the percentage of people using the internet around the world has continued to grow” (Li 2). Censoring the internet has been a hot topic for quite a while now. Many people believe that censoring the web isn’t a good thing because of certain laws and rights we have as citizens. The internet has some cons but it also has many pros. The downside of the censorship is that the truth is blocked out and it violates our freedom of speech. On the other hand, censorship of the internet can reduce the numbers or even stop human trafficking, prevent identity theft, stop cyber bullying and so much…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Net Neutrality

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Net Neutrality is a legal concept that has recently been the focus of numerous media headlines. Let me make this clear. Net Neutrality is not simply another meandering piece of legislature, rather it is philosophical idea woven into law. Now that this philosophy has been written into law by the United States government the true nature of its framework coming to light ("What the heck is net neutrality? - The Washington Post," n.d.). Net Neutrality has been a leading topic of discussion in the field of technology for quite some time, yet few know exactly what the term means. This is very unfortunate because the subject matter has the potential to significantly impact us all. The following text will explain the ins and outs of Net Neutrality and…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics