Preview

Nero's Personality Traits

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
861 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nero's Personality Traits
Nero
Key Personality Traits
Nero’s reign started off with compassion for his subjects. As insecurities and burdens controlled him, he made drastic new decisions. Nero has the Introverted, Sensing, Feeling, Perceptive (ISFP) personality type. Those with this personality type are often referred to as the “artisan” or the “adventurer.”

Nero is an ambitious but rather weak and restless character during his youth. Nero regrets signing his first death warrant and banned bloodshed in arenas – signs of sensitivity. ISFPs typically dismiss and refuse to take criticism. Nero is prone to fits of rage and tantrums when circumstances are not in his favour. To handle his deep fear of judgement and refusal; Nero exploits his authority in order to gain control
…show more content…
At the beginning, he praises Nero’s good intentions then later harshly judges his wrongdoings. Suetonius is one of the most reliable historians as he rarely voices his opinions. Being Emperor Hadrian’s secretary, Suetonius had access to sources. In The Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Suetonius says that Nero is one who “cannot control himself in every aspect of his personality,” detailing his ill conducts (gambling, unnecessary money laundering etc.) that would eventually lead to Nero’s demise. “He thought there was no other use of riches and money than to squander them away profusely,” strongly emphasises Suetonius’ distaste of Nero’s behaviour. Suetonius makes reference to Nero’s emotional state as he speaks of his inability to control his volatile temper.

Tacitus was the only main historical source to be born in Nero’s reign. He incorporated rumours into his perception of his emperor. Tacitus’ outlook on Nero is heavily biased. Tacitus’ belief that emperors are corrupt is factual, validated by Nero’s actions to remove political opponents to maintain power. Tacitus scorned Nero and almost no mention of his good deeds. In Annals Book XV, Tacitus mentions Nero’s excessive vanity, naiveté and laughs and mocks his cowardly demeanour.
Tacitus also believes that Nero persecuted the Christians for his own selfish desires and that execution methods were brutal and appalling. “Or perhaps he was always frightened, remembering his crimes,” suggests his spinelessness as he refused to confess to burning

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Justinian’s accomplishments were like those of Trajan and his personality was like Neros’. Trajan was a clever man who created programs for public work and child welfare. Trajan also built multiple new bridges, harbors, and aqueducts. However, Nero was the opposite he was a selfish liar who did not care how his decisions affected his people and “Justinian was…crafty, hypocritical, secretive by temperament, two-faced: a clever fellow who created countless cities which did not exist before with marvelous ability to conceal his real opinion… lying all the time…”(Documents 1&2). Justinian was an emperor with flaws like Nero he was a selfish liar who spent countless amounts of money building the Hagia Sophia without considering the consequences, but at the same time like Trajan he was clever, crafty and was able to build multiple new cities that benefited the…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    poisoned Claudius. What isn't known is how much that Nero knew or got involved in with…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Scullard, H. H. (2003). From the Gracchi to Nero: A history of Rome, 133 B.C. to A.D. 68. [S.l.]: Routledge.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Rome burned in a fire Nero became one of the infamous people in the city.In addition to killing his own mother he also killed his first wife and his second wife.Tacitus claims that his second wife was the reason why Nero killed his one & only mother.I don't know what his second wife did to kill his only mother but it must have been relation ship problems.…

    • 68 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people have come to the conclusion that Nero did not start the Great Fire of Rome. They have come to this conclusion based on the fact that he was not there at the time to ignite the fire. Also he had witnesses who saw where he was at the time of the fire. Being that Nero was disliked, he was framed for a fire that started accidentally. Many myths about Nero circulated about him being the one who started the fire which accredited to his bad reputation. Nero did not start the Great Fire of Rome because he was not present during the time the fire started, myths were started about him, and was framed for the fire because he was disliked.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While initially seen as a fair ruler this can be most contributed to the level heads and knowledge given from those who primarily advised the young ruler, and as his advisers left him to his own resources we can see the slow decline and shift in Emperor Nero’s priorities and desires. His perceived lack of caring for the support of the Roman people that eventually promulgated his down fall and resulted in his death. In other words best intentions are often laid barren and to waste when focus is…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He killed his mother, step-brother and two wives, but did he? He killed the Christians and many senates, but did he? He burnt Rome and built his palace upon the burnt remains of the city, but did he? Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus or more known as Rome’s youngest emperor, Nero. He rose into power and became the ruler of the world's largest, most powerful and dominant empire; the Roman Empire, only at the age of 17. His mother; Agrippina the Younger is known to be the main reason behind his imperial power, as her desires to control were fulfilled through her control of him, thus she was indirectly ruling the Empire through her young son. Moreover, Rome’s new young and loved emperor was soon hated and blamed for many crimes that he may or may not…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nero Claudius Caesar

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page

    Nero Claudius Caesar, was born under the name Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus, in the year 37 AD and was adopted by his uncle, Emperor Claudius. Nero’s mother had married Claudius after the death of her late husband. She later killed poised Claudius, leaving the throne wide open for 17 year old Nero. In his 5 years as emperor, Nero became highly disliked by both his citizens and fellow members of the Roman government. Nero is probably the most infamous Roman emperor, as he had assassinated his wife, mother along with numerous other people assassinated. He is also infamously known for his widespread massacre of Christians, which he blamed for the great Roman fire. He committed suicide, when he realized that everyone was against him in 68…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Emperor Nero was a sick human being who seriously lacked humility. He thought of himself as a god and would perform inhumane deeds such as stealing from sacred temples or killing innocent Christian people. Nero roughly killed about one hundred thousand Christians for no good reason whatsoever. He would use them to light up his parties or he would throw them into the gladiator pit, facing them against ferocious animals or deadly ruthless warriors. Nero's serious lack of humility caused him to perform poorly as a leader. If Nero had shown more humility throughout his time as leader, he would most likely have been not only a better person, but also a better leader. A good leader needs to display virtue in order to lead his people to…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The leader of Rome is dead, and two men have completely different opinions as to what has happened to him. Brutus, his right hand man, says that he had to be killed due to his excessive ambition. While Antony states that he was brutally murdered by the people who called themselves his friends. But only one of the two stood out, they were so believable and convincing that it was hard to believe anyone other than him. And this speech was given by Antony. He gave an incredibly convincing speech, making the people of Rome completely look past the words of Brutus by sparking different emotions in them. But at the same time he was very careful and precise with his words which helped to protect him from the conspirators who murdered Caesar.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are various points Tacitus uses the praise that frequently heaps on his father-in-law Agricola as a vehicle for condemning the values of contemporary Rome. First, Tacitus describes Agricola’s character a man who had no “…incorruptibility and self-restraint in a man of his caliber would be to insult his virtues”. By stating this, Tacitus send a message to everyone that all the other consult and leaders were driven by corrupt and self-interest. Tacitus gave a clear picture of the values of all higher rank officials as well as the people who were aspiring to attain power. They were driven by greed, corruption, and the motive to attain all the power. Secondly, Tacitus describes Agricola as someone who “…scorning all rivalry with his colleagues,…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the beginning of Nero’s rule, he was said to be a fair Emperor, but as his power increased his regards to what is just or unjust vanished. Nero did not consider himself subjected to laws. He took advantage of his power and used it for his own personal gain, simply because there was no one with the authority to make him stop. He killed anyone he considered a threat to his throne including his own mother, Agrippina. Nero spent large amounts of the Empire’s money for his own artistic pursuits. He even took money from temples in Rome in order to build himself an extravagant villa. He was not forced to follow any laws because he was the Emperor; therefore, he chose to disregard laws and do as he pleased. He lived extravagantly and irresponsibly; he was not concerned with doing what was considered just or fair.[bonus…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corruption or the abuse of power is evident in the story of Julius Caesar, as it’s often mentioned by the characters, and is the center of the tragedy. Cassius, throughout…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article "Days of the Martyrs" By Jeffery L. Sheler it tells up why Christian communities where prosecuted just because of there beliefs. By the second century Christian numbers started to drop drastically mostly because of the persecution by the government authorities. These government authorities where concerned of the out lawed movement of "Atheist." Atheists were Christians that rejected Rome's pagan pantheon and decided to worship one invisible god. At the time when the persecutions of Christians started to begin the emperor of Rome was Nero, and Nero was somewhat behind it all. For example, In A.D 64, Emperor Nero started a fire that devastated Rome then put all the blame on the Christians so that he could kill many of them. During about A.D. 111, the emperor of Rome was now emperor Trajan. During emperor Trajan’s rule the persecution of Christians became much more infrequent. Emperor Trajan did no longer go out of his way to kill some innocent people. Just because he didn’t try to kill every Christian he sees doesn’t mean he didn’t kill them at all, if any Christian was charged and convicted the were to be executed unless…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Boudicca & the Revolt

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Differences and contradictions exist in both accounts of the revolt, with Tacitus harbouring a more lenient attitude towards the British in his collections, ‘Agricola’ and the ‘Annals’. Tacitus suggests that the underlying cause of the revolt was the mistreatment of the Iceni tribe by the Romans following Prasutagus’ death. Tacitus writes in Agricola, ‘the Britons dwelt much amongst themselves on the miseries of subjection…’ introducing the idea that the native’s rights had been suppressed and that the revolt was partly at the fault of the Roman government. Tacitus, in the Annals, proposes that frustration and resentment grew within the Iceni after the Romans ignored Prasutagus’ will to share the rulership of the tribe between the emperor and his two daughters. Instead, Roman officers and slaves alike attacked his kingdom, publicly flogging his wife, Boudicca, and raping his two daughters. Outrage ensued within the humiliated tribe, subsequently leading to the rise of the revolt. Tacitus’ account of the events that led to the revolt display a soft tone of sympathy towards the natives, whilst also openly criticizing and condemning…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays