Nelson Mandela Comparison Essay

Being just is an indispensable part of leadership. It is a full-time duty where one is always a spectacle for others in his actions. There are two very contrasting examples of leaderships that could be compared in this context. The first one is Nelson Mandela who is known as the epitome of peace and courteousness whereas the second one is Saddam Husain who is known for his tyrant ways of leading people. The former is the inspirational figure for a lot of people in the world in terms of sympathy and love. On the other hand the latter is famous for treating people like animals and doing wrong things behind the veil of his leadership.
Controlling people with power and peace are two very different things from a leadership perspective. A leader
On one hand, Mandela was driven by the passion and incentives towards the liberation and self-empowerment of the public. This became evident when he clung into power after release from prison. Ruling for only one term, Mandela opted to give leadership to another president. On the contrary, the Saddam Hussein’s ideologies of leadership were contrasting and entailed incarcerating people to oppress them. His tenure and the president of the Iraqi people were filled with element of torture and oppression to the people. This made him too unpopular among the people. His personal perception of power was heavily skewed and was evident when he gained power. Downgrading and rubbishing the rule of democracy, Hussein’s rule was ruthless and was not willing to incorporate democracy in his tenure. It took a foreign invasion to hoist him from power (Post, 2005, p. 335). Lack of democratic understanding in leadership was a key definitive character that sidelines his character with that of Nelson Mandela in South Africa. The leaders were so imbibed in their passion that they feared nothing that came their way. However Mandela dealt with things the noble way while Saddam Hussein infamously killed people and won them by dropping them as dead