Preview

Negligence: The Case Of Peterson Vs. Donahue

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
375 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Negligence: The Case Of Peterson Vs. Donahue
Torts
Defenses to Negligence, Pg. 106, 4.7

In the case of Peterson v. Donahue, Neal Peterson sued David Donahue for negligence after a ski collision that occurred while both parties were on the ski slopes. Eleven year old Peterson was coming down the slopes very fast when he collided with forty three year old, advanced skier, Donahue who was skating across the slope toward the parking lot. Donahue saw Peterson seconds before the impact which knocked him out of his skis ten to twelve feet down the slope and knocked Peterson unconscious. Peterson sought recovery for the accident by filing a suit in the Minnesota State Court against Donahue alleging negligence.

Because both parties were aware that falls, collisions, accidents and injuries

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The most prevalent tort in scenario 2 is negligence. The first act of negligence would be the glass that was found in Anna’s food that caused her injury. The second negligent act was the waiter’s decision to carry a flaming dish through the restaurant without announcing his presence. The restaurant owner’s negligent decision to not install an emergency exit other than a revolving door entrance caused an elderly woman to be trampled and caused several other patrons to suffer from smoke inhalation and burns. Anna also has a medical malpractice tort because when she was taken to the hospital to have surgery on her mouth a hospital mistake resulted in her leg being amputated instead.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Petitioner V Negligence Case

    • 4763 Words
    • 20 Pages

    1 of 3 DOCUMENTS M.A. MORTENSON COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. TIMBERLINE SOFTWARE CORPORATION and SOFTWORKS DATA SYSTEMS, INC., Respondents. No. 67796--4 SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON 140 Wn.2d 568; 998 P.2d 305; 2000 Wash. LEXIS 287; CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P15,893; 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 357 October 26, 1999, Oral Argument Date May 4, 2000, Filed PRIOR HISTORY: [***1] Appeal from Superior Court, King County. 95--2--31991--2. Honorable Phillip Hubbard, Judge. DISPOSITION: Court of Appeals affirmed, upholding trial court's order of summary judgment of dismissal and denial of motions to vacate and amend. LexisNexis(R) Headnotes COUNSEL: For Petitioner: Bradley L. Powell, Oles Morrison Rinker & Baker Llp, Seattle, WA, Catherine…

    • 4763 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On December 25, 2003, 63-year-old Nancy Sue Brown was injured exiting a packed Georgia movie theater by tripping over an A-frame caution sign that an employee used after cleaning up a spill that had occurred ten-minutes earlier. The sign Brown tripped over had fallen, possibly by the crowd of people, and was lying flat on the ground. Brown states she was paying attention to the crowd to prevent running into anyone and therefore did not see the sign on the floor. An ambulance escorted Brown to the hospital where she was given prognoses of several broken bones in her foot. Two years later, Brown had back surgery to correct injuries, she believed, she had sustained in the fall. A month after the surgery, in December 2005, Brown claimed suit in…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I have followed the case in Chicago regarding the shooting death of 17-year-old Laquan McDonald, who was shot 16 times by a police officer. The case happened in Chicago on October 20th ,2014. The cases are still being investigated However, Officer Jason Van Dyke has been charged after the video tape was made public on November 25th, 2015. The video was only made public after a freedom of information act request was made. How the request was made; an individual that had knowledge of the tape informed a person that the was acquainted with and knew, that this tape needing to been revealed. The tape existed for well over a year with no in in the public being able to see it, until this request was made.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the Assistant Attorney General (AAG) with whom I work has to take a case to the Circuit Court for an appeal, it will be with the judicial branch. According to Dana C. McWay, the judicial branch is a branch of the governemt who evaluate laws, clarifies laws, resolves disagreements and decides if a law goes against the Constitution.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I strongly believe negligence in the part of the NMDOT and their associates are the direct cause of the loss of life of my father (Leo Sr.). The NMDOT owes the public a safe and clear lane of travel for pedestrians and traffic, as well as to provide the public a safe and clear lane of travel. The NMDOT breached this duty, and the breach of duty was a direct and proximate cause of the death of Leo Griego Sr. The DOT failed to use due care and caution with safety and concern for both workers and the public when setting up the construction zone. They failed to confirm in advance that any construction or utility vehicles were parked in a safe area and clear area from traffic. The DOT Failed to warn any person utilizing safety personnel. Failing…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. In this test there is an '............................' where the defendant's characteristics aren't usually taken into account as demonstrated in the case Nettleship v Weston.…

    • 2178 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Reasonable care means having the duty to avoid injuring others, both bodily injury and property damage. It also refers to when someone uses ordinary prudence under the circumstances to avoid injury or other loss.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At what point is a parent legally bound to take her sick child to a physician instead of treating him with home remedies gleaned off the Internet?…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contributory and comparative negligence are legal concepts that are slightly similar in meaning. These are two separate legal concepts that minimize the liability of the defendant (McWay, 2010). The biggest difference between the two is that with comparative negligence there is usually some type of monetary compensation. But with contributory negligence, there won’t usually be any type of monetary compensation.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negligence at the Workplace

    • 3596 Words
    • 15 Pages

    1. a. b. c. d. 2. a. b. c. d. 3. a. b. c. d. 4. a. b. c. d. 5.…

    • 3596 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Negligence Paper

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    It is human nature to make mistakes; however, mistakes that cause harm to someone else could be considered negligence. In the case with Mr. Benson in the Neighborhood Newspaper article, a mistake was made that was irreversible. He went into the hospital to have his leg amputated, and the doctor amputated the wrong leg. The question is was the doctor negligent in his practice? Is the amputation of the wrong leg considered to be malpractice on the doctor’s part? This paper will differentiate between negligence, gross negligence, and malpractice. After differentiating between these terms, it will be determined if the doctor operating on Mr. Benson was considered to be negligent, gross negligent or was this mistake malpractice.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every year, many people visit amusement parks. The thrill of the rides coupled with good times shared with family and friends make theme parks a popular destination. Unfortunately, theme park rides and attractions are not always designed or maintained properly.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    i)Alf has a direct relationship with the employer as he is one of the employees of Skimpy PLC and the employer owes him a duty of care. However, the company hasn’t guarded the machinery which should be one of their primary duties as it was seen in the case Close v Steel Co of Wales where all dangerous parts of machinery should be securely fenced according to the section 14 Factories Act 1961. All workers will need safety at work and the Health and Safety at work Act 1974 will ensure all employees are safe within their workplace. Breach of these duties will constitute in a criminal case as it is in Alf’s case. On the other hand this event could also be a civil case as Alf can sue Skimpy PLC for compensation for his personal injury. Alf will have to prove that the company caused the injury negligently or without taking reasonable care to avoid injuring others. Alf will also have to prove a duty of care was owed, breach of duty and damaged caused by the breach, then only will the law allow compensation. The company will be against giving compensation as they can protect themselves by saying that Alf removed the guard “contrary to instructions”. In this case Alf will clearly be affected by contributory negligence as he had removed the guard to make the job quicker causing him injury. Therefore it will be very difficult for Alf to receive compensation as it was seen in the case Close v Steel Co of Wales where Mr Close didn’t receive any compensation for his injury.…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Malpractice In Healthcare

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1a: The two common strategies that health insurance companies in the U.S. apply to maximize their profit is by increasing cost and decreasing coverage. The U.S. maximizes cost by increasing cost of prescription pill and charging for malpractice insurance. U.S. charges ten times more for prescription medication and One-hundred time more for malpractice insurance than other developed countries. (Reid 2010). The U.S is also maximizing profit by decreasing the number of people eligible for coverage through a “patchwork” system. For instance, those with preexisting conditions will be refused coverage since they’re already ill. Another method is through the “medical loss ratio” and it refers to the loss that insurance companies will face when treating…

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays