Preview

Negligence and Duty of Care

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3058 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Negligence and Duty of Care
Negligence is essentially concerned with compensating people who have suffered damage as a result of the carelessness of others .One of the main ways in which access to compensation is restricted is through the doctrine of the duty of care.Essentially,this is a legal concept which dictates the circumstances in which one party will be liable to another in negligence.Breach of a duty of care essentially means that the defendant has fallen below the standard of behavior expected in someone undertaking the activity concerned ,so for example, driving carelessly is a breach of the duty owed to the road users,while bad medical treatment may be breach of the duty owed by doctors to patients.In each case,the standard of care which could be expected from a reasonable person.This means that it is irrelevant that the defendant’s conduct seemed to be fine to them; it must meet a general standard of reasonableness.Not all careless conduct which causes damage will give rise to an action because to be liable in negligence,there must be a duty to take care and breach of that duty by the defendant causing damage to the claimant as illustrated in Lochgelly Iron Co. v McMullan. The elements of negligence are duty of care,breach of care,causation and that the damage is not too remote.There have been developments to the standard of care in the tort of negligence in recent years to encourage people to take care and discourage actions likely to endanger others. As the test is objective,the particular defendant’s own characteristics are usually ignored.A striking example of this is that the standard of care required of a driver is that of a reasonable driver,with no account taken of whether the driver has been driving for 20 years or 20 minutes,or even is a learner driver.In Nettleship v Weston(1971)the claimant was a driving instructor,and the defendant his pupil.On her third lesson,she drove into a lamp post and the claimant was injured.The court held that she was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Scenario: As pedestrians exited at the close of an arts and crafts show, Jason Davis, an employee of the show’s producer, stood near the exit. Suddenly and without warning, Davis turned around and collided with Yvonne Esposito, an 80-year-old woman. Esposito was knocked to the ground, fracturing her hip. After hip replacement surgery, she was left with a permanent physical impairment. Esposito filed suit in a federal district court against Davis and others, alleging negligence.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hsa 515 Law and Health

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The first element that a plaintiff must prove is that the defendant owed him or her legal duty of care. Generally, this duty of care is a legal notion that states that people owe anyone around them or anyone who could be around them a duty to not place them in situations of undue risk of harm. Proving this element will largely depend on the facts of the situation. After the plaintiff has proved that a legal duty of care existed, he or she must then prove that this duty was breached. Generally, courts will use the standard of a ‘reasonable person’ when it comes to this question. Specifically, this means that the judge or jury must view the facts of the situation and decide what a reasonable person would have done in a similar situation. If this reasonable person would have acted differently than the defendant, it’s likely that it will be found that the duty was breached. Causation is the most complicated element of negligence. It means that the plaintiff must prove that the defendant either directly or indirectly caused the injuries and damages suffered by the plaintiff because of the breach of the duty of care. This element has confused even the most respected legal minds over time, and its proof should not be taken lightly. Last, a plaintiff in a negligence case must prove a legally recognized harm, usually in the form of physical injury to a person or to property. It is not enough that the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care. The failure to exercise reasonable care must result in actual damages to a person to whom the defendant owed a duty of care (FindLaw 2012). These damages can be actual costs such as medical expenses and lost income or intangible costs such as pain and suffering or loss of companionship.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torts Breakdown of Elements

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages

    2. Negligence is the failure of an ordinary, reasonable, and prudent person to exercise due care, resulting in harm or injury to the plaintiff. Negligence torts do not require intent. Negligence is conduct that falls below the level necessary to protect others against unreasonable risks of harm. To determine if someone should be found liable for a negligence tort, a reasonable person standard is used. If the defendant 's behavior is found to be less careful than behavior a reasonable person would exhibit, that defendant can be found liable for damages.…

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pa201 Unit 3 Assignment

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Negligence is defined as “the failure to exercise the standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would have exercised in a similar situation; any conduct that falls below the legal standard established to protect others against unreasonable risk of harm.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1133 (9th ed. 2009) …

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assistance to persons in distress by person performing duties for an entity as prescribed by the Civil Liability Regulation…

    • 758 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Homework 2

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tort of negligence occurs when someone suffers injury because another’s failure to live up to a required duty of care.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A patient came into the hospital after suffering a head injury. While receiving care, the patient was misdiagnosed with a concussion, but admitted for observation. The Duty of Care would fall on the attending physician who was responsible for providing an appropriate diagnosis for the patient. Throughout the night, the patient was not routinely monitored and because of this, the hospital staff failed to acknowledge signs that his condition was deteriorating. The patient was found in a coma when the next shift came in. The Breach of Duty would have to be the staff that failed to monitor the patient during his stay as his conditioned worsened. The injury that was sustained by the patient was irreversible brain damage. Causation is present…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In defining whether an act constitutes negligence, in addition to actual damage, there should have one more condition: the perpetrator has duty of care2. Only when a perpetrator has a duty of care, and the perpetrator 's behavior does not meet the required standards of conduct and breaching the obligation, negligence is constituted. The perpetrator will then be responsible for respective party. It is clear that duty of care research is necessary in negligence cases.…

    • 2838 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negligence falls under civil law as the plaintiff is entitled to seek monetary compensation from the defendant by reporting the incident or filing a complaint or case to the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA). Plaintiff refers to the injured patient or the patient’s family members whilst the defendant refers to the healthcare professional or the…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negligence Case

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The plaintiff’s vulnerability- An outraged gathering is helpless if he was not capable of figuring out how to shield himself from the reckless exhibition…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are two defendants in this case are the family practice physician and the nurse practitioner. Both healthcare professionals impacted the outcome of this case through an act of omission; therefore, the healthcare professionals failed to act when there was a duty to act as a reasonable and prudent person (Law.com, n.d.). According to Pozar (2016), failure to act when there is a duty to act in a similar circumstance is considered nonfeasance which is a form of negligence.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Contributory negligence means that the plaintiff has not been very careful in looking to their own actions so that, in part, their failure to assess the risk has given rise to the damage that has been suffered. The case that is used to define contributory negligence is Connors v Western Australian Government Railways Commission [1992] Aust Torts Rep 81-187.…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negligence can be defined as the failure to properly care for an individual that is in your care. Doctors are not the only ones that can be held liable for treatments or procedures that the individual has undergone. Negligence occurs when care is not given to an individual that results in the death or injury. Since we have a lot of partnered care in health care everyone in those respected fields can be held liable for any treatment or service that is provided. Several health jobs that the individual may encounter are nurses, medical assistants, certified nurse’s aide, pharmacists, technicians, phlebotomists, and so forth. With each of these jobs negligence, can occur. The people in this are carrying out the doctors’ orders and sometimes if care is not given to the individual errors occur and it can be the difference of life, death, and injury. Family members would then be able to sue the doctor, the facility, or the nurse.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Negligence Case Summary

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Negligence is a failure to take reasonable care to avoid causing injury or loss to another person (Law Hand Book, 2013). Negligence can be used when a party has experienced loss or damage from the wrongful actions or omission to act of another individual. This principal can be found in The Civil Liability Act 2003(Qld). The following report will examine the tort of negligence While analyzing the case study of Mr. Jones vs Blue Board Production and will provide an evaluation to the tort of negligence.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negligence is the failure to exercise the care toward others which a reasonable or prudent person would do under certain circumstances or taking action which a reasonable person would not (http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/negligence). Negligence also assesses the human choice to engage in harmful conduct as proper or improper. This is because choices are deemed improper only if they breach a preexisting obligation to avoid and repair carelessly inflicted harm to others. In some instances, a statute or other law may define specific duties, such as the duty of a person to rescue another. Professionals, such as doctors and lawyers, are also required to uphold a standard of care expected in their profession. When a professional fails to uphold such a standard of care, the professional may be liable for malpractice (doctors are liable for medical malpractice and lawyers are liable for legal malpractice), which is based on the law of negligence.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays