Preview

Neanderthal Culture War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
295 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Neanderthal Culture War
In an argument that takes the phrase “culture wars” to a new level, a group of researchers says it’s possible that cultural superiority gave human ancestors the upper hand over their Neanderthal cousins.

Neanderthals lived in what is now Europe for hundreds of thousands of years before humans arrived. Last year, researchers dated the oldest human skull found outside of Africa, in Manot Cave in Israel, to 55,000 years old. That marks the known start to a time when the two hominids lived side by side, a period likely full of interaction and competition for food and other resources. By 45,000 years ago, humans had arrived in Europe. Some 5,000 years later, the Neanderthals were extinct.

Archaeologists are in two camps over what exactly happened. Some believe the Neanderthals died off because of climate change or epidemics. Others think modern humans wiped them out with better tools, clothing or social organization.
…show more content…
The team modified a mathematical model frequently used to predict competition between populations and added, for the first time, new dimensions for cultural advantage and the ability to learn.

They set the model so that the more culturally advanced a group was, the larger it could grow. Because humans were spreading into Neanderthal territory, it’s likely that those leading the charge arrived in small numbers, compared with the established Neanderthals. Despite this disadvantage, the cultural skills they brought with them could have allowed them to hunt, settle land and otherwise use resources more efficiently than the original residents. Eventually, their numbers would swell, making them even more

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In this section of Guns, Germs, and Steel, Diamond portal’s the food production was the root because of beneath the ability of the Eurasia people. This information helped develop guns, germs, and steel. This helped them conquer the rest of the world. Jared Diamond discusses how the food production came to this. The greater the population the more food can be produced. The more food you have for the people the longer they will live.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In her article entitled “Close Encounters of the Prehistoric Kind”, Science Magazine correspondent Ann Gibbons explains that due to interbreeding between Neanderthals and early modern humans, modern humans still contain traces of prehistoric Neanderthal DNA. According to researchers, Asians and Europeans most likely possess a higher frequency of Neanderthal genomes than Africans because the two species “occupied the [same regions] intermittently” in Europe, the Midwest, the Near East, and Russia and may have coexisted with one another for up to 10,000 years before the Neanderthal lineage died out. The article explains that Neanderthal genomes are present in “many people living outside of Africa” as there was not enough interbreeding occurring…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He brings in historical, proven examples of societies that have beaten out others for the pure reason of their environment and not their biological evolution. One example given by the author to support this idea is comparing Homo neanderthalensis and Cro-Magnons within part one of the book. Cro-Magnons are distant ancestors from where the anatomically modern Homo sapiens derived. Although it has been proven Homo neanderthalensis had a larger cranial capacity than modern humans, which correlates to a higher degree of intelligence, they however are the ones that are extinct. Diamond follows this line of thinking throughout the book, focusing on a multitude of different topics that could have affected the lives of past peoples.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies by Jared Diamond is the response to a question Diamond had been asked by a New Guinean politician, Yali, in 1972. The question was, “Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo and brought it to New Guinea, but we black people have little cargo of our own?” This refers to the inequality between many different civilizations, quite like how Europeans developed great objects and wealth that they used to dominate over other societies. Diamond begins to wonder why that is, “Why did human development proceed at different rates on different continents?” Before explaining possible answers, Diamond clarifies that his book isn’t to justify European domination of other civilizations nor does the answer take a European historic approach. Diamond also clarifies that hunter-gatherer civilizations are not inferior to agricultural or industrial civilizations.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In section two, chapter four, Diamond argues that superior food production was the root cause beneath the ability of Eurasia’s people to develop the guns, germs, and steel that conquered the rest of the world. First, a population that can produce more food can also produce more…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Time Frame: Neanderthals diverged over 550,000 to 690,000 years ago. Other data estimates they lived between 365,000 and 853,000 years ago and 465,000 before present. Human trunk and limb bones of Homo antecessor, recovered from the Gran Dolina site in Spain have been dated at about 780,000 years old and are said to represent the last common ancestor for modern humans and Neanderthals. Phylogenetic analysis of Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA leads to a date for the common ancestor of the Neanderthal and modern humans at around 465,000 to 600,000 years ago. Archaeologists have found much physical evidence to confirm this date, such as the 0.73 Mya old fossils with stone tools and animal bones. The other date matches the movement of modern humans out of Africa and the appearance of modern traits in fossil skulls. Fossil skull traits such as high rounded skulls and small brow ridges, a vertical forehead and a pronounced chin first appear in Africa about 130,000 years ago. They then appear outside of Africa over 90,000 years ago.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instructor: Dr. Joyce Parga; Email: j.parga@utoronto.ca Office hours: Tuesdays & Thursdays 3-4 pm (or by appointment); Office: MW 382 Lecture meeting times and location: Tuesdays 1-3 pm in SW 319 Tutorials (labs): 5 Tuesdays across the semester during your 1-hr tutorial section in MW 329 Tutorial TA: Dejana Nikitovic; Email: dejana.nikitovic@mail.utoronto.ca; Office: MW 343 (Note: Tutorials begin in Week 3 on Tuesday May 21. See Tutorial Schedule at end of syllabus.) Course Description: This course will provide a basic introduction to Evolutionary Anthropology and Archaeology, aimed at students with no background in either field. Prerequisites: None Exclusions: ANT100Y, ANT101H Required Readings: All chapters listed below in the lecture schedule refer to the following course textbook, which is available for purchase from the UTSC bookstore: Lewis, B., Jurmain, R., and Kilgore, L., 2012. Understanding Humans: Introduction to Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 11th edition. Belmont CA: Wadsworth. You can also purchase the text from the publisher as an e-book. Go to: http://www.nelsonbrain.com/shop/isbn/9781111831776 (On Blackboard, there is a PowerPoint file provided by the publisher about buying the e-book – look under “Course Materials”.) Lecture schedule: Following is a planned list of topics to be covered in lecture; note that topics are subject to change and all topics listed may not be covered, but you are responsible for doing all of the readings. Date 7 May 14 May 21 May Lecture Topic Course Intro /What is Anthropology/Evolution Genetics/Processes of Evolution Non-Human Primates/Primate Behaviour…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Although there is no direct evidence and a species language or their language capabilities do not fossilize, coupled with more modern techniques being used today and archeological evidence, it is possible now to study this topic with more success than in previous years. There is a record that supports the suggestion of Homo neandertal speech capabilities. Previous to the recovery of an intact middle paleolithic hyoid bone, the reconstructed vocal tract and the FOXP2 gene, the lack of evidence on the speech capabilities of Homo neandertals led most scholars to regard the topic as unsuitable for serious study (2012) .…

    • 2384 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theory that Neanderthal and Homo Sapiens are cousins focuses on the time period when both existed and the geographic locations of both groups. Homo Sapiens lived in Africa, Europe, the Middle East, and India prior to the third interglacial period, the proposed time of contact. Neanderthals developed in East Asia in the colder…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In earlier history evidence shows humans originated from Africa and started spreading out 100,000 years ago. Similarly, the Europeans left to explore, also they came from Africa like the African slaves but they…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is consequently reasonable to assume that hostility, culminating in a sort of primitive warfare, would have emerged between the two species. Numerous discoveries in both Neanderthal and Homo Sapiens bones seemed to show inter-species violence from injuries including indents in the bones that could only have originated from spear or other projectile heads fashioned with common tool-making means contemporary to the period (Bryner 2009, 1). Examples of Neanderthal mass massacres such as El Sidrón, northern Spain, where evidence of tools being used to cut flesh from bones (Zimmer 2010, 1). give a bleak insight into the everyday struggles some populations may have faced, with constant competition with Homo Sapiens for resources, and some engaging in cannibalism, the idea that the emergence of early modern humans was a majorly contributing factor to their extinction is a highly plausible one. Competitive edge regarding surviving/hunting on the part of early modern humans has accounted for the decline of Neanderthals' during a span of thousands of years (Banks et. al 2008, 1). Early modern humans use of superior weapon technology and supposed domestication of wild dogs presumably gave them the upper hand when it came to hunting fauna, an examination of contemporary sites of Neanderthals and early modern humans with animal remnants…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It may be argued that one’s culture is indicative of the way in which they behave. Is this an accurate assumption? Tess calls attention to the difficulties we face in ascertaining whether nature or nurture poses a greater influence to human behaviour, and I am inclined to agree with her assumption that the two are interdependent. Our behaviour is deeply rooted in the functioning of the society in which we live, something which indicates the interference of evolution in teaching us the valuable role of society in relation to our ultimate survival. For it is the ability to adapt to the cultural norms surrounding us via what Hogan refers to as “archaic, powerful and compulsive tendencies,” [Hogan, 1985] that contributes to the overall success of human social life. This is exemplified through the examination of ancient human society. DeWaal points out the ever-present “strife and competition which… pose the strongest threat to [human] existence” [DeWaal, 1996], and Pinker refers to the idea of reciprocity as being “ubiquitous in foraging societies” [Pinker, 1997]. These two facets of social existence may in fact be linked in that they work to counter one another. Rather than constantly competing in the interests of the self, early human beings came to realise the benefits of co-existing with one another. We are all subject to this same evolutionary history which tells us that social harmony is key in our ultimate survival, and this requires adherence to our common culture. In other words, we are nurtured with reference to the teachings of our nature, therefore in this case the two cannot be separated as they are reliant on one another.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humanism characterized ‘the human’ by its “separation from and capacity to rise above nature”, by virtue of cultivation of the ground, and domestication of animals, and is attributed to the Bible’s injunction to subdue nature. Differences in how we fared at ‘subduing nature’ could be explained by how each people had adapted to its own particular environment, but was all considered to be on the same human scale, there was always the ‘underlying unity of man’. They saw race as people who were further ahead or behind rather than as being something different because of some innate difference or deficiency, but thought us all as one species. Men launched ‘Human Development’ and ‘Human Improvability’ efforts trying to ‘civilize’ the ‘savage’ Indians, but there were very few success stories. The article states that “Clearly the limited level of development among the American Indians caused some concern, and at the very least required further explanation”.…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Neanderthal Traumas

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We know what we know about history from the examining of fossils, DNA records, , and technological advances overtime.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    war and culture

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    the relationship between war and culture found in the Lee chapter you read for this week. Chapter 9 discusses artificial war as it relates to using weapons from the air and those used for long distance bombing. During the Gulf War air strikes and long-range missiles and artillery was far more superior in winning this conflict. The terrain was extremely accessible and the enemy seemed to be easily marked. This conflict changed the military culture for boots on the ground as this strategy dominated an untrained and less dominant force. Ten years later Americans found themselves fighting the Global War of Terrorism and thought using the same technology would be effective. Our high-tech military against the low-tech enemy failed and again Americans had to rely on Soldiers on the ground and counterinsurgency. Technology and globalization, I believe, is contributing to the inability for the average American to serve in our military today due to their physical inabilities. To compensate these shortages the government begins to contract private contractors to fulfill the American military obligation for defending our country. Without our technology and the best equipment money can buy, American soldiers would die by the thousands to the hands of insurgency who are born to fight and will continue a legacy of war. 2. Explain how you used the Lee chapter you read in your core assessment case paper. I study am using chapter 9 for the core assessment and case study. The thesis is to describe how war is affecting our military in the aspects of training, beliefs, values, and norms as we have evolved in technology and the way we fight today. I will use my past experience and knowledge I have gained while serving in the military for 22 years and operating in conflicts dating back to Desert Shield/Desert Storm and from the ranks of Private to First Sergeant to attempt in relating to how military culture has changed. Soldiers have evolved in killing since the Civil War through…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays