Preview

Nature Vs. Nurture: Theories Of Personality

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
935 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nature Vs. Nurture: Theories Of Personality
Nature versus Nurture
Carolyn Bennett
PSY/330 Theories of Personality
Maurita Hodge
04/20/2015

Psychology has not been able to explain why the intelligence in individuals is different. The only way to explain the differences is to look at the individuals lifestyle. Their morals, their social life, their ethics, their education, and other issues. "The topic of why differences occur in intelligence among different people is a great topic for discussion as it creates a lot of interest and debate giving rise to different beliefs of individuals and biases."( Howe (1997))
Nature is where some scientists believe that nature has used genetic predispositions to form your personality. There are many traits that are inherited, the
…show more content…
One issue is that there is a question of an existing "gay gene". Meaning that a gay person is born that way. There is also a ”behavioral gene". This gene causes aggressive behavior and abuse. Also, it could cause people to want to get a divorce. The behavioral gene also shows up in fraternal twins. When they are raised separately they show the same behavioral patterns as if they were raised together. Even though fraternal twins could be similar in their ways, the environment could have a nature effect on them. No matter what is researched, there is still the question of is this the way we were born or is this the way experience we have gained through …show more content…
"This is true because different people have different preset concepts founded on which they can organize or arrange their mind through experiences". (Kline (1991)) The mind will gather knowledge while it is experiencing an action. Right now, human development involves both nature and nurture. The question is which one is responsible for our major development, nurture or nature.
"Explaining humans based on solely nature factors is not much convincing as it cannot explain why some values strive to go on, even though, there may not be any natural selection factor present. For example, we may argue why there should be a preference when the individual has chosen a different preference. Sometimes a preference may simply turn into retribution". (Manolakes, (1997))
The reason scholars are debating over this issue is that it has been found that some traits cannot be erased by genes. If everything is based on genetic traits then it would be hard to picture someone with differences is difficult. A perspective from a social science point of view explains that different events can influence the operation of the human mind..
"The activities of human mind actually show proofs of nurture as well as nature".(Ridley, (1999)) and "It is wise to take into account what the social scientists or psychologists are saying. It would be a good decision".( Liungman,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Over the years, a certain debate has arisen and became a question that circles people’s minds frequently. What influences our personal development: nature or nurture, or perhaps a bit of both? Both sides of the argument have clear, everlasting points, which make it very difficult to come to a conclusion. As many know, both nature and nurture have huge impacts on our personal development, but we have yet to discover whether which one effects us the greatest.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ‘Nature’ versus ‘Nurture’ debate is a topic that has been discussed by Psychologists, Scientists and Philosophers for hundreds of years. It concerns individuals ‘innate’ qualities versus that of ‘learned’ behaviour and experiences.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Disaster in Franklin Co.

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nature vs Nurture are studies that have been going on for years within the scientific community to explain multiple issues. Some studies will suggest that nature makes us who who are, meaning genetic factors are the major contributor of being who we are. These include what personality traits, intelligence, and emotional characteristics we will inherit from our parents. Thus, these studies ultimately state we are genetically predisposed in deciding who we become. On the other side of the debate is the nurture studies, meaning environmental factors are the major contributors to shaping us into who we are or become. This include your upbringing, your lifestyle, home environment and the way someone was interacted with, taught or treated as a young child.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    also influences who we are now, going to be. The genes that influence our personality, the…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    M1 Nature and Nurture

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nature is known as the innate ability to develop a certain type of way, it looks at how an individual develops with regards to their biology. Nurture is known as the abilities that an individual develops over time due to different factors that can be emotional, social, intellectual and physically developed over a certain period of time. It can be argued what influences what in regards to these concepts.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Counselling Theories

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The concept of nature versus nurture is that human behaviour is influenced by genetic information inherited from our parents and also by environmental and social influences.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Health and Social Care

    • 2560 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Fast-growing understanding of the human genome has recently made it clear that both sides are partly right. Nature endows us with inborn abilities and traits; nurture takes these genetic tendencies and moulds them as we learn and mature. End of story, right? Nope. The "nature vs. nurture" debate still rages on, as scientist fight over how much of whom we are is shaped by genes and how much by the environment. (http://genealogy.about.com/cs/geneticgenealogy/a/nature_nurture.htm)…

    • 2560 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that it is flawed to ask how much of a particular behavior is due to genetics and how much to experiences, because it is a rigid explanation that tries to attribute a particular proportion to each part. The key point is to recognize the complex collaboration of both nature and nurture; the environment inputs along with the genetic code play and important role on human development. As a result, each person develops different types of personalities. Besides, scientists, still have many types of challenges ahead behind human nature.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The nature theory argues that human behaviour is often based on their genetics. It’s argued that human behaviour is the result of inherited traits that people are born with. Even though a person would have experience and learnt things from other people, his/her nature or characteristics would not change. Some people might say we do not have ‘free will’ because our destinies have already been determined by our traits. A child may have a positive upbringing but genetics may show that the child may always be violent no matter what type of upbringing he/she has.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    psychologists have been trying to figure out which of the two, nature or nurture, influence the…

    • 2000 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many scientists think that people behave as they do according to genetic dispositions or even “animal instincts”; this is known as the “nature” theory of human behaviour. Even though scientists have known for decades that traits such as eye and hair colour are determined by specific genes encoded in each human cell, the nature theory takes things a step further, to say that most abstract traits such as intelligence, personality, aggression…

    • 2919 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be argued that nature influence early human development. According to Charis Darwin, he emphasised that human development is inherited and genetically program. Many researchers agree, but; not only that ‘nature’ and ‘nurture’ playing important roles in human life. Than that they combine continuously to key development. Example: The developments of every character such as poignant stability appear to be manipulating to be like heredity and upbringing. In addition, some behaviourist such as Watson and Skinner are also believed that a newborn baby can be qualified into any professional type; it might be doctors, sport persons, and pilots etc. Regardless of his/her ability and talent.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nature refers to the inherited (genetic) characteristics and tendencies that influence development. Some inherited characteristics appear in virtually everyone. All children have a set of universal human genes that, when coupled with a reasonable environment, permit them to develop as reasonably capable members of the human species.…

    • 3017 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Other kinds of genes create differences among people. Children’s stature, eye color, and facial appearance are largely determined by genes. Children’s temperament—their characteristic ways of responding to emotional events, novel stimuli, and their own impulses—seems to be in part affected by their individual genetic makeup (Rothbart, Ahadi, & Evans, 2000; D. C. Rowe, Almeida, & Jacobson, 1999). Similarly, being slow or quick to learn from instruction and everyday experiences has some genetic basis (Petrill & Wilkerson, 2000; Plomin, 1989).…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nature vs. nurture has been discussed by philosophers in the past and by scientists most recently. Philosophers such as Plato argued that all knowledge was inherited through your parent and when you were told something you didn't learn it you were just reminded of it. Aristotle however argued that all humans were born with a blank slate and built on it with influence from there environment. In the 1700's the empiricists and the internalists took over the argument. They fought through letters explaining there point of views and denouncing the others. This leads to Pavlov coming up with the idea of behaviorism in the early 1900‘s. Behaviorism became the new wave of Psychology and influenced a lean towards the nurture side. It was not effectively argued against until 1928 when Watson published his book. This opened up the floodgates for environmental influences studies. Soon the idea of nurture was the popular excuse for behavior. Studies using animals were the most popular was in which scientists used to prove a theory, or disprove a theory. The newest studies use human twins to prove nature vs. nurture.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays