Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Nature Vs Nurture Essay

Better Essays
975 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nature Vs Nurture Essay
Maggie Kent
3/27/14
Child Development p.3
Nature vs. Nurture
Nature vs. Nurture
There is a constant battle between researchers from different fields saying almost all traits come from genetic makeup and that traits are based off of the environment a person is living in. When it comes down to the argument of nature versus nurture, there is no clear answer. Based on the research, I believe the environment plays a larger role in determining a person’s traits than genes do. The way an individual is raised can have different influences on their intelligence and how they will end up as adults. Family is also a major role in the upbringing of a child. When a person in raised in an environment with negative factors, they could be slightly off mentally, and even physically, as an adult. A person that grows up with parents that are addicted to toxic substances, it is believed they have a greater risk of being addicts throughout their life because that is what they were raised with. However, some researchers believe it is in your genes to be an addict if your mother was doing drugs or drinking will pregnant. That is wrong. An individual raised with addicts have parents have the ability to make the choice to be different from their parents and to stay away from toxic substances. Studies show that addiction is 50-60% genetic. (Genetics of Addiction 2014). There are still another 40-50% of people that have just made poor decisions and ended up as addicts. Roughly 50% of addicts that have a family history of addiction are able to overcome it by making the right choices and getting help when they felt it necessary.
One of the best examples of the nature versus nurture debate is intelligence. Researchers in favor of nature believe if two parents with lower IQs have a child, that child will have a low IQ too. (Bouchard & Lykken 1990) However, those researchers are not taking school into account. If parents know their child is going to have a lower IQ, they should take initiative and enroll their child in a more advanced learning career at a young age. In a study done by Thomas Bouchard and David Lykken in 1990, they found that seventy percent of an individuals intelligence is from due to their genetic makeup. Bouchard and Lykken also concluded that thirty percent of intelligence can be influenced by the environment that individual is in, such as education, family setting, and toxic substances. Enrolling the child in advanced schooling early on will encourage the child to work harder starting at a young age and by the time the child is in high school or college, they could be at the top of their class.
Although I do believe that nurture plays a larger part in child development, genetic makeup does play a role as well. In this field of study, one of the best experiments that are done are ones involving monozygotic twins. In the Minnesota Twin Study, identical twins were separated and raised in very different environments. The findings of the experiment were that the twins grew up to be very similar in appearance, personality, and basic psychology. This proves that nurture is not the only factor, but that genes do significantly determine the possible outcome of an individual. The factor that plays the largest role in how any person grows up is their family. Family influences an individual more than anyone would really think. The most prominent example of family influencing an individual would have to be with sports. In an article written in the Washington Post, author David Epstein concludes that a person needs both nature and nurture in order to succeed. However, if you look at professional athletes with kids that play the same sport as them, you have to wonder if that child is genetically prone to play or if they just want to be like mommy or daddy. Some parents also believe that their child will have to take over the family business one day just because it ‘runs in their blood’. This is also false because Bouchard and Lykken both concluded that genes to not determine a person’s destiny, and they do have the power to change what they want to do. Studies also show that the amount of every emotion a parent shows to their child at a young age can influence how much that child exhibits certain emotions. For example, a parent that is very affectionate with their child and always tells them how much they love them will produce a child that does the same thing with their child and with other people as well. The same theory goes for other emotions such as rage and sadness. “...As environmental forces create a stronger influence on differences in a particular characteristic, genetic influences will be weaker.” With the influence of family, different factors, and the environment a person is raised in have a greater influence on the development of their personality and even their physical being than the genes they’re born with. Throughout the last hundred or so years, thousands of different psychologists have discussed this topic and it is still something that is being talked about. The majority of those psychologists believe nature is the reason for how everyone behaves, but there are a handful of that are empiricists, meaning they believe that environment is the reason for behavior. I consider myself one of those empiricists because nurture is the reason for how children develop.

Citations
Bouchard, T., Lykken D., McGue, M., Segal, N., & Tellegen, A. (1990). Sources of human psychological differences: The Minnesota study of twins reared apart. Science, 250, 223-229.

"The Genetics of Addiction." Addictions and Recovery, 17 Feb. 2014. Web. 02 Apr. 2014.

Roberts, Steven V. "Review: ‘The Sports Gene,’ on the Science of Athletic Performance, by David Epstein." Washington Post. The Washington Post, 11 Sept. 2013. Web. 03 Apr. 2014.

Citations: Bouchard, T., Lykken D., McGue, M., Segal, N., & Tellegen, A. (1990). Sources of human psychological differences: The Minnesota study of twins reared apart. Science, 250, 223-229. "The Genetics of Addiction." Addictions and Recovery, 17 Feb. 2014. Web. 02 Apr. 2014. Roberts, Steven V. "Review: ‘The Sports Gene,’ on the Science of Athletic Performance, by David Epstein." Washington Post. The Washington Post, 11 Sept. 2013. Web. 03 Apr. 2014.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In my personal development many things conditioned me into the adult I am now. I do agree that nature has a big impact on your mental traits and your development. But I think that nature has a bigger role in detailing how a person receives certain conditions from nurture. I believe that nature’s role is one that people cannot see in themselves or other people can see in yourself. For instance, your genes might allow you to handle a tragedy in your life better than someone else. Like when my father divorced my mother and I lost contact with her I was able to handle it well based off my nature. Now nurture is a theory that is seen and shown in almost everyone’s personal development. In my personal development nurture revolved around how my father has to raise me alone and still teach me manners, and how to be a citizen in society. I know now that his job was tough but at the time I listened and learned, failed and was punished, but eventually developed into who I am today. You can also look at intelligence. Nature suggest that you are given a certain IQ level and that determines how smart you are. However, you can be nurtured into learning common sense by failure or others teaching you what not to do in certain situations. Not to mention you learn knowledge from teachers in school which is also considered nurture. I personally believe that nature is indeed a factor in everyone’s development but I also thoroughly believe that your nature can be altered by nurture therefore altering your development. This is proven because your environment is always changing and you can never know how your development as a human would turn out if you had an environment that didn’t…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A nature-nurture debate is concerned with what causes something to develop. The debates of nature vs. nurture tend to be historical rather than current. Today, most psychologists see development differently: they believe biological predispositions guide development in certain directions, but experience as influencing how that development manifests itself. The two sources are seen as interconnected, not as opposing alternatives, and it is the way that they interact which is the focus of…

    • 307 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are you the same person as when you were four? I am going to tell you what nature vs nurture is in my following statement. In nature you believe that your personality was formed by genetics and not by parenting. Nurture believes that parenting formed who you are not your genetics. My third paragraph is about twins and how they are alike by nature. My fourth paragraph is about your personality and how it forms and works. My fifth paragraph is about the studies on diseases and how they harm you, and the way you live. I believe in most cases that nature forms your personality.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Nature vs. Nurture argument isn’t a new discussion point. Rather, it has very early introduction. Considered the “biggest and most persistent issue” (Myers, 2013, p5) in psychology. Plato, a Greek philosopher alive between (428 and 348B.C.E), believed that our morality and capability of intelligence was inherited. Shortly thereafter, Aristotle argued that all that a human has is not innate, but arrives through external experience (Myers, 2013, p5). According to John Watson (American psychologist) a nurture theorist once said “give me a dozen healthy infants, well-formed, and my own specified world to bring them up in and I’ll guarantee to take anyone at random and train him to become any type of specialist I might select... regardless of his talents, penchants, tendencies, abilities, vocation and race of his ancestors” (Myers, 2013,). He believed nurture played a major role in the upbringing of a child.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nature/nurture debate is a debate that I did not learn much about until I was in college. Before college, I was mostly taught that it is either nature or nurture. The main points of the nature/nurture debate was discussed in class. There are people that think the nature/nurture debate as one or the other. Nativists are people who believe in nature. They believe everything that a human is made up of is determined by genes only; genetic determinism. There are people who believe that everything is owed to nurture. Environmentalists look at experiences and learned behaviors. There is also people who think both nature and nurture effect the outcome of humans. Interactionists often use a model called G x E., which is when something from the environment…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether nature or nurture has more of an influence over individual development is debatable and has been a common argument in the field of psychology for a long time. Nature refers to inherited traits and genes given to us at birth which we have no control over, and nurture refers to family, friends or society. The exchange between nature and nurture is dynamic and complex and both nature and nurture cause dynamic and continuous influence on development. The relationship between nature and nurture cannot be explained definitively and it is hard to determine which one influences human development more.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Babe Ruth is arguably the greatest baseball player of all time. Bill Clinton held the highest office in the free world, President of the United States. J.R.R. Tolkein authored one of the most successful fiction book series ever in the Lord of the Rings. Steve Jobs created on of the most successful computer businesses in the world, in Apple Co. What do these men have in common? They were all adopted. Adoption plays a large role in the development of an individual. Adoption plays a role in the long time psychological debate of “nature vs. nurture”. This paper will address the nature vs. nurture debate, how adoptions plays a role in the debate, give a history of adoption, and tell the story of a personal friend who was adopted and overcame the tragedy of his nature and was able to triumph through his solid nurturing.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For decades, nature versus nurture debate has been an ongoing argument among experts studying life span development. Those who believe that nature is the determining factor of development argue that genes determine an individual 's personality, attitudes, and behavior. The other side of the debate among experts is that nurture or experiences and environment have the most influence on development. Santrock states, "nature refers to an organism 's biological inheritance, nurture to its environmental experiences" (Santrock, 2007, p. 17). This paper will take the debate a little further by examining whether nature or nurture has more of an influence on children raised…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Addiction Psychology

    • 4576 Words
    • 19 Pages

    McGue (1999) found that genes contribute to the development of alcohol dependence, with heritability estimates from 50-60% for both men and women.…

    • 4576 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The great nature versus nurture debate is one of the oldest controversial issues. Some people would prefer to call this issue heredity versus environment. To this day, psychologists ask whether a child’s development is governed by a pattern built in at birth or if experience shapes a child’s behavior. On the nature side of the philosophical argument, theorists believe that learning depends largely on genetics. On the nurture side of the argument, theorists believe that the environment plays a huge part in the developmental learning process of a child. However, there are theorists who are stuck in the middle and feel that both nature and nurture play a role in the learning process of a child. “Development is shaped by both biology and experience-both are equally important” (Dickstein, 2007, p.1).…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nature versus nurture debate is one of the oldest psychological debates in history. Its focus is around the impact of genetic inheritance and environmental factors on human development. This means that nativists, the nature side of the debate, believes that one is “born that way”. In contrast empiricists, the nurture side of the debate, believe that traits are learned through life experiences due to one’s environment. Some of the largest controversies are centered on homosexuality and influences on intelligence. (Cherry 2012) notes that “Today, the majority of experts believe that development and behavior are influenced by both nature and nurture.” While there are very few experts that take extreme views of empiricism or nativism, the debate rages on about exactly how much nature and nurture impacts human development respectively.…

    • 865 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is evidence that genetic plays a role in the development of alcohol and drug dependence through environmental factors. The environmental factors that play a role in genetic in addiction pertains to risk factors. According to Thomas and Osborn (2013), the genetic-environmental interaction consists of various sources of risk factors such as stress, economic hardship, family, and surrounding oneself with substance users. Additionally, Dick and Agrawal (2008) illustrate that individuals that share the same gene are more likely to be at risk for alcohol and drug dependence based on a twin study. However, society demonstrate that if one family members is an alcoholic another member may be at risk. In this case, the gene in one member can within another member, however, individuals may need to go through testing in order to determine if genetic is a factor that is contributing to an addiction. Additionally, genetics plays a role in determining alcohol or drug dependence through a wide range of genes instead of a single gene. Genes play a role in drug dependence but it is not deterministic or the sole reason an individual struggle with an…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper is going to discuss the Nature vs Nurture debate. There will be history of the debate, where it is presently and where it may go in the future. We will look at the beginning of the debate, the battle that started with Descartes and was pushed further by BF Skinner, Bandura and Piaget. We will further look at Bandura and Piaget and look at Social learning theory verses biology. Interviews with a sibling set of sisters, one adopted and one biological separated by 4 months in age will show us how being raised in the same environment will over shadow biological beginnings. The Nature vs Nurture debate will be discussed in detail comparing and contrasting the sisters likes and dislikes, social skills, talents and education. We will see where the debate stands today. This has been a century’s long debate and we will touch on current research and what studies are showing.…

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The psychological debate of nature vs. nurture is one that has been considered and contradicted for many years. This debate is so controversial because although it is fact that genetic makeup does play a major role in developing a person, the nurture and environment in which a person is brought up in is also an important factor.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is Nature Or Nurture?

    • 2393 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Mike has been convicted of 3 DUIs and has done his time in prison. Mike is trying to explain to his family that he is reformed but his family does not believe him. Is it possible for Mike to change who he is or is his alcoholism in his DNA for the rest of his life. This brings up the theory of Nature vs Nurture. In the context of Nature vs Nurture, nature means that things like personality, development, and addiction is due to their DNA.…

    • 2393 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays